Advertisement

Antibacterial and physical properties of a novel sonochemical-assisted Zn-CuO contact lens nanocoating

  • Yoav NahumEmail author
  • Reut Israeli
  • Gabriel Mircus
  • Ilana Perelshtein
  • Miriam Ehrenberg
  • Shay Gutfreund
  • Aharon Gedanken
  • Irit Bahar
Basic Science
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

This work examined the antibacterial and physical effects of a novel Zn-CuO nanocoating applied on a silicone hydrogel contact lens.

Methods

Zn-CuO coating of PureVision balafilcon-A soft contact lenses (Bausch&Lomb, Rochester, NY) was performed by sonochemical deposition using a high-intensity ultrasonic horn. Non-coated PureVision lenses served as a control in all experiments. Adhesion assays for P. aerueginosa and S. epidermidis to the coated lenses were performed to identify the minimal coating concentration which still possessed antibacterial activity. Lens water content, oxygen transfer light transfer, leaching, and electron microscopy studies were performed using this concentration.

Results

Coated lenses showed 3–5 log reductions in adhesion of both species. The lowest tested coating concentration of 0.02 wt% led to a log reduction of 3.25 ± 1.25 of P. aeruginosa CFU/lens (P = 0.007) and a log reduction of 4.37 ± 0.75 of S. epidermidis (p = 0.0007). Using this coating concentration, water content (36%, 33.6%), oxygen transfer (87.22 ± 10.96, 92.18 ± 2.38, × 10−11(cm2/s)(mlO2)/(ml × mmHg)), p = 0.12), and light transfer properties did not differ significantly between the coated and the control contact lenses. In the range of 380–780 nm wavelength, the coated lenses transmitted 96.47 ± 1.52% while the control lenses transmitted 97.36 ± 1.35%. The corresponding values for the range of 300–380 nm wavelength were 79.343 ± 8.754 and 80.169 ± 1.35. Leaching studies for 0.5 mM coated lenses have demonstrated the excellent stability of the coating with the release of only 0.005% of the coating after 1 week of exposure to the test solution.

Conclusion

Sonochemical-assisted nanocoating of contact lenses showed significant and consistent antibacterial activity while preserving the basic properties of a silicone hydrogel contact lens.

Keywords

Contact lenses Anti-bacterial agents Cornea Infection 

Notes

Funding

The study was supported by a grant from Rabin medical center and by a grant from the Clair and Amedee Martier Institute for the Study of Blindness and Visual Disorders.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Ilana Perelshtein and Aharon Gedanken are the inventors of a patent relevant to this study. Yoav Nahum is a paid consultant for Shire Pharmaceuticals Israel and Taro Pharmaceuticals Industries, The other authors declare that they have no financial interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Cope JR, Collier SA, Rao MM et al (2015) Contact Lens wearer demographics and risk behaviors for contact Lens-related eye infections--United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64:865–870.  https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6432a2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S a I, Tuli SS, Wagoner RC (2006) Fungal keratitis: emerging trends and treatment outcomes. Eye Contact Lens 32:267–271.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.icl.0000249595.27520.2e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McLaughlin-Borlace L, Stapleton F, Matheson M, Dart JK (1998) Bacterial biofilm on contact lenses and lens storage cases in wearers with microbial keratitis. J Appl Microbiol 84:827–838.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00418.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dart JK, Stapleton F, Minassian D (1991) Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis. Lancet 338:650–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dantam J, Zhu H, Willcox M et al (2012) In vivo assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of silver-impregnated contact lens storage cases. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:1641–1648.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dutta D, Ozkan J, Willcox MDP (2014) Biocompatibility of antimicrobial Melimine lenses: rabbit and human studies. Optom Vis Sci 91:570–581.  https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhu H, Kumar A, Ozkan J et al (2008) Fimbrolide-coated antimicrobial lenses: their in vitro and in vivo effects. Optom Vis Sci 85:292–300.  https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31816bea0f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dutta D, Vijay AK, Kumar N, Willcox MDP (2016) Melimine-coated antimicrobial contact lenses reduce microbial keratitis in an animal model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:5616–5624.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suslick KS, Choe S-B, Cichowlas AA, Grinstaff MW (1991) Sonochemical synthesis of amorphous iron. Nature 353:414–416.  https://doi.org/10.1038/353414a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tuby R, Gutfreund S, Perelshtein I et al (2016) Fabrication of a stable and efficient antibacterial Nanocoating of Zn-CuO on contact lenses. ChemNanoMat 2(6):547–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Willcox MDP (2007) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and inflammation during contact lens wear: a review. Optom Vis Sci 84:273–278.  https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180439c3e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henriques M, Sousa C, Lira M et al (2005) Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 82:446–450.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000168585.53845.64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szczotka-Flynn LB, Pearlman E, Ghannoum M (2010) Microbial contamination of contact lenses, lens care solutions, and their accessories: a literature review. Eye Contact Lens 36:116–129.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181d20cae CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO Standard 18369–3:2006. (2006) Contact Lenses – Part 3: Measurement Methods. https://ia601001.us.archive.org/27/items/gov.in.is.iso.18369.3.2006/is.iso.18369.3.2006.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2018
  15. 15.
    ISO Standard 18369–4:2006. (2006) Contact Lenses – Part 4: Physicochemical properties of contact lens materials. https://ia800407.us.archive.org/21/items/gov.in.is.iso.18369.4.2006/is.iso.18369.4.2006.pdf Accessed 11 June 2018
  16. 16.
    Lellouche J, Friedman A, Lahmi R et al (2012) Antibiofilm surface functionalization of catheters by magnesium fluoride nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 7:1175–1188.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S26770 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perelshtein I, Applerot G, Perkas N et al (2008) Sonochemical coating of silver nanoparticles on textile fabrics (nylon, polyester and cotton) and their antibacterial activity. Nanotechnology 19:245705.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/24/245705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petkova P, Francesko A, Fernandes MM et al (2014) Sonochemical coating of textiles with hybrid ZnO/chitosan antimicrobial nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1164–1172.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am404852d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abramov OV, Gedanken A, Koltypin Y et al (2009) Pilot scale sonochemical coating of nanoparticles onto textiles to produce biocidal fabrics. Surf Coat Technol 204:718–722.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.09.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shalom Y, Perelshtein I, Perkas N et al (2017) Catheters coated with Zn-doped CuO nanoparticles delay the onset of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Nano Res 10:520–533.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1310-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malka E, Perelshtein I, Lipovsky A et al (2013) Eradication of multi-drug resistant bacteria by a novel Zn-doped CuO nanocomposite. Small 9:4069–4076.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201301081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones L, Brennan NA, González-Méijome J et al (2013) The TFOS international workshop on contact Lens discomfort: report of the contact lens materials, design, and care subcommittee. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-13215
  23. 23.
    Lira M, Santos L, Azeredo J et al (2008) Comparative study of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses surfaces before and after wear using atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 85:361–367.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyRabin Medical CenterPetach TikvaIsrael
  2. 2.Sackler School of MedicineTel-Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials (BINA)Bar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael
  4. 4.Clinical Microbiology LaboratoryRabin Medical CenterPetah TikvaIsrael
  5. 5.Department of OphthalmologyAssaf Harofeh Medical CenterZerifinIsrael

Personalised recommendations