Advertisement

Safety and complications after three different surface ablation techniques with mitomycin C: a retrospective analysis of 2757 eyes

  • Juliane Mehlan
  • Stephan Johannes Linke
  • Christos Skevas
  • Johannes Steinberg
  • Konstantinos Giannakakis
  • Toam Katz
Refractive Surgery
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the safety and spectrum of complications of three excimer laser surface ablation techniques (SATs) with an intraoperative application of mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02%. A retrospective, non-comparative large case series.

Methods

SATs were performed on 2757 eyes with a preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) of − 4.41 ± 2.44 and a Wavelight Allegretto 200 platform. Ablation zone diameters between 6.0 and 7.0 mm were used according to mesopic pupil size. All patients were treated with an intraoperative application of MMC for 30 to 90 s depending on refractive error. The mean follow-up time was > 3 months (107 ± 24 days). Complication range and incidence were analyzed retrospectively and safety index was calculated.

Results

Two thousand seven hundred and fifty-seven eyes met the inclusion criteria for surface ablation. Two thousand five hundred and seventy-three eyes were assigned to alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (APRK), 135 eyes to transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK), and 49 eyes to off-flap epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis (EpiLASIK/EpiK). Overall, the safety index was 1.06 ± 0.28. Haze was graded according to the Fantes scale. Haze incidence rates were highest in the TPRK group (14.81%) and comparably low in APRK (2.95%) and EpiK (4.08%) groups.

Conclusions

Intraoperative topical application of MMC (0.02%) results in good safety and no severe side effects. However, highest incidence of haze was observed after TPRK. The more frequent peripheral localization of haze might be attributed to large ablation zones and the wavefront optimized ablation profile especially in the PTK modus of the laser platform.

Keywords

Laser Mitomycin C Safety Surface ablation technique Haze 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Alio JL et al (1998) Complications of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: two year follow-up of 3000 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 24(5):619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aslanides IM et al (2012) Comparison of single-step reverse transepithelial all-surface laser ablation (ASLA) to alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy. Clin Ophthalmol 6:973–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aslanides IM et al (2015) Single-step transepithelial ASLA (SCHWIND) with mitomycin-C for the correction of high myopia: long term follow-up. Clin Ophthalmol 9:33–41Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carones F et al (2002) Evaluation of the prophylactic use of mitomycin-C to inhibit haze formation after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:2088–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fantes FE, Hanna KD, Waring GO, Pouliquen Y, Thompson KP, Savoldelli M (1990) Wound healing after excimer laser keratomileusis (photorefractive keratectomy) in monkeys. Arch Ophthalmol 108:665–675.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fiore R et al (2001) Broad beam vs. flying spot excimer laser: refractive and videokeratographic outcomes of two different ablation profiles after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 17:534–541Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gambato C et al (2005) Mitomycin C modulation of corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy in highly myopic eyes. Ophthalmology 112:208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gartry DS, Kerr Muir MG, Marshall J (1991) Photorefractive keratectomy with an argon fluoride excimer laser: a clinical study. Refract Corneal Surg 7(6):420–435Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gartry DS et al (1992) The effect of topical corticosteroids on refractive outcome and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Arch Ophthalmol 110:944–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghadhfan F et al (2007) Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:2041–2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hersh PS et al (1998) Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study. Ophthalmology 105(8):1512–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaluzny BJ et al (2016) Single-step transepithelial PRK vs. Alcohol assisted PRK in myopia and compound myopic astigmatism correction. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee D et al (2005) Photorefractive keratectomy with intraoperative mitomycin-C application. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2293–2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Majmudar PA et al (2000) Topical mitomycin-C for subepithelial fibrosis after refractive corneal surgery. Ophthalmology 107:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Brart DP (2014) Excimer laser surface ablation: a review of recent literature. Clin Exp Optom 97(1):12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Brart DP et al (1994) Night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: haze and halos. Eur J Ophthalmol 4(1):43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pop M, Payette Y (2000) Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study. Ophthalmology 107(2):251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rajan MS et al (2006) Effects of ablation diameter on long-term refractive stability and corneal transparency after photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 113(10):1798–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schipper I, Suppelt C, Gebbers JO (1997) Mitomycin C reduces scar formation after excimer laser (193 nm) photorefractive keratectomy in rabbits. Eye 11(Pt 5):649–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seiler T, Quurke AW (1998) Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 24(7):1007–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shalchi Z et al (2015) Eighteen-year follow-up of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Surg 41:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sher NA et al (1994) 193-nm excimer photorefractive keratectomy in high myopia. Ophthalmology 101(9):1575–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Talamo JH et al (1991) Modulation of corneal wound healing after excimer laser keratomileusis using topical mitomycin C and steroids. Arch Ophthalmol 109(8):1141–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thornton I (2007) Low-dose mitomycin C as a prophylaxis for corneal haze in myopic surface ablation. Am J Ophthalmol 144(5):673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Torricelli AA et al (2014) Cellular and extracellular matrix modulation of corneal stromal opacity. Exp Eye Res 129:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yulish M et al (2012) Ascorbate prophylaxis with mitomycin-C for corneal haze after laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy. IMAJ 14:382–385Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juliane Mehlan
    • 1
  • Stephan Johannes Linke
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christos Skevas
    • 1
  • Johannes Steinberg
    • 2
    • 3
  • Konstantinos Giannakakis
    • 4
  • Toam Katz
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUKE - University Clinic Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Care-Vision GermanyHamburgGermany
  3. 3.zentrumsehstärkeHamburgGermany
  4. 4.Augenarztpraxis Dr. med. Wilhelm Kröncke & Albrecht ZwickBremerhavenGermany

Personalised recommendations