Advertisement

A simple infrared-augmented digital photography technique for detection of pupillary abnormalities

  • Tarek A. ShazlyEmail author
  • G. R. Bonhomme
Neurophthalmology

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the study was to describe a simple infrared photography technique to aid in the diagnosis and documentation of pupillary abnormalities.

Methods

An unmodified 12-megapixel “point and shoot” digital camera was used to obtain binocular still photos and videos under different light conditions with near-infrared illuminating frames. The near-infrared light of 850 nm allows the capture of clear pupil images in both dim and bright light conditions. It also allows easy visualization of the pupil despite pigmented irides by augmenting the contrast between the iris and the pupil.

Results

The photos and videos obtained illustrated a variety of pupillary abnormalities using the aforementioned technique.

Conclusions

This infrared-augmented photography technique supplements medical education, and aids in the more rapid detection, diagnosis, and documentation of a wide spectrum of pupillary abnormalities. Its portability and ease of use with minimal training complements the education of trainees and facilitates the establishment of difficult diagnoses.

Keywords

Infrared Pupil Anisocoria Horner Ptosis Adie's syndrome 

Notes

Financial disclosure

The financial disclosure is as follows:

Author 1: Tarek A Shazly, M.D. FRCS (Glasg): None

Author 2: Gabrielle R. Bonhomme, M.D.: None

Supplementary material

Video 1

Video was captured using the infrared augmented technique with the point and shoot camera in video mode. Using the near-infrared goggles in dim light, the asymmetry in the size of the pupils is noticeable. With direct illumination of each eye, no change in the size of either pupils occurs. However, on fixation on a near target, both pupils constrict and right pupillary irregularity became more evident. (WMV 6801 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Wachler B, Brian S, Krueger RR (1999) Agreement and repeatability of infrared pupillometry and the comparison method. Ophthalmology 106(2):319–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wachler B, Brian S, Krueger RR (2000) Agreement and repeatability of pupillometry using videokeratography and infrared devices. J Cataract Refract Surg 26(1):35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piha SJ, Halonen JP (1994) Infrared pupillometry in the assessment of autonomic function. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 26(1):61–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bloom PA, Papakostopoulos D, Gogolitsyn Y, Leenderz JA, Papakostopoulos S, Grey RH (1993) Clinical and infrared pupillometry in central retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 77(2):75–80CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Larson MD, Muhiudeen I (1995) Pupillometric analysis of the'absent light reflex'. Arch Neurol 52(4):369–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manley GT, Larson MD (2002) Infrared pupillometry during uncal herniation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 14(3):223–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Capão Filipe JA, Falcao-Reis F, Castro-Correia J, Barros H (2003) Assessment of autonomic function in high level athletes by pupillometry. Auton Neurosci 104(1):66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosen ES, Gore CL, Taylor D, Chitkara D, Howes F, Kowalewski E (2002) Use of a digital infrared pupillometer to assess patient suitability for refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 28(8):1433–1438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohnen T, Terzi E, Bühren J, Kohnen EM (2003) Comparison of a digital and a handheld infrared pupillometer for determining scotopic pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 29(1):112–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schnitzler EM, Baumeister M, Kohnen T (2000) Scotopic measurement of normal pupils: colvard versus video vision analyzer infrared pupillometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 26(6):859–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scheffel M, Kuehne C, Kohnen T (2010) Comparison of monocular and binocular infrared pupillometers under mesopic lighting conditions. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(4):625–630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB (2004) Monocular versus binocular pupillometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 30(12):2551–2556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shwe-Tin A, Smith GT, Checketts D, Murdoch IE, Taylor D (2012) Evaluation and calibration of a binocular infrared pupillometer for measuring relative afferent pupillary defect. J Neuroophthalmol 32(2):111–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations