Clinical and demographic correlates of apathy in Parkinson’s disease
To better understand the demographic, neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and motor predictors of apathy in Parkinson’s disease (PD).
112 participants (Mage = 68.53 years; Mdisease duration = 6.17 years) were administered the Apathy Scale (AS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Trail Making Test (TMT), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Matrix Reasoning subtest, letter (F-A-S) and category (Animals) fluency, and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised. Psychosis was assessed. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the ability of demographic factors and clinical assessments to predict nonapathetic (AS ≤ 13) versus apathetic (AS > 13) group membership.
The regression analysis yielded a robust model in which older age, less education, elevated BDI-II, current psychosis, higher MDS-UPDRS Part III (motor score), and slower TMT-B performance predicted membership in the apathetic group, with a correct classification rate of 77.5% (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.48, p < .001). Depression (OR = 9.20, p < .001) and education (OR = 0.66, p = 0.002) contributed significantly to the overall model. A linear regression with AS score as the outcome variable was similar, but TMT-B additionally contributed significantly (p = 0.02) to the overall model, F(6, 86) = 12.02, p < .001, adjusted R2 = 0.42.
Of the factors examined, depression, education, and executive functioning were the strongest correlates of apathy in PD. These results support the idea that common underlying frontosubcortical disruptions in this population contribute to apathy, depression, and executive dysfunction.
KeywordsParkinson’s disease Apathy Depression Cognition Executive function
This study was funded by the American Parkinson Disease Association Center for Advanced Research at the University of Virginia.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study received local institutional review board approval and has, therefore, been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study.
- 31.Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK (1996) Manual for the beck depression inventory-II. Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 32.Grace J, Malloy PF (2001) Frontal systems behvaior scale: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., LutzGoogle Scholar
- 37.Reitan R, Wolfson D (1985) The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. Neuropsychological Publishing Group, TucsonGoogle Scholar
- 38.Wechsler D (2008) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. Pearson Education, Inc., San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 39.Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D (2012) Neuropsychological assessment, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 40.Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 41.Brandt J, Benedict RHB (2001) Hopkins verbal learning test-revised: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., LutzGoogle Scholar
- 42.Heaton RK, Miller SW, Taylor MJ, Grant I (2004) Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., LutzGoogle Scholar
- 46.Arbuthnott K, Frank J (2000) Trail Making Test, Part B as a measure of executive control: Validation using a set-switching paradigm. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 22:518–528. https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3395(200008)22:4;1-0;FT518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Muslimovic D, Post B, Speelman JD, Schmand B (2005) Cognitive profile of patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease. Neurology 65:1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000180516.69442.95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar