Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Sex estimation in the cranium and mandible: a multislice computed tomography (MSCT) study using anthropometric and geometric morphometry methods

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to analyze the respective contribution of the skull and mandible to sex estimation in an entire cranium using metric and geometric morphometric methods and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) analysis.

Materials

The study sample comprised 120 individuals aged 23 to 84 years and divided into three groups (whole sample and over or under 40 years of age).

Methods

Forty-eight osteometric landmarks were positioned using Osirix®, 34 for the cranium and 14 for the mandible. The data were analyzed using univariate analyses and logistic regression using backward stepwise selection with cross-validation of the classification results. Generalized procrustes analysis (GPA) was used, and Goodall’s F test and Mahalanobis D2 matrices allowed an assessment of statistical significance.

Results

The classification accuracy of cranium models ranged from 87% to 88.3%, and from 68% to 81.4% for the mandibular models. With geometric morphometry, accuracy was of 94–100% for the cranium and 84.2% for the mandible.

Discussion

We conclude that the mandible had a higher accuracy rate for individuals over 40 years than individuals under 40 years of age, although the accuracy of geometric morphometry did not differ significantly between the age groups. The cranium, however, presented greater predictability for all the parameters assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig 1
Fig 2

References

  1. 1.

    Scheuer L (2002) Application of osteology to forensic medicine. Clin Anat 15:297–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10028

  2. 2.

    Bigoni L, Velemínská J, Brůžek J (2010) Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex. HOMO 61:16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.004

  3. 3.

    Quatrehomme G (2015) Indentification du disparu. In: Quatrehomme G (ed) Traité d’anthropologie médico-légale. De Boeck Supérieur, Louvain-la-Neuve, pp 99–1182

  4. 4.

    Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA (2008) An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis. HOMO 59:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2007.01.001

  5. 5.

    Steyn M, İşcan MY (1998) Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 98:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00120-0

  6. 6.

    Rosas A, Bastir M (2002) Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. Am J Phys Anthropol 117:236–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10023

  7. 7.

    Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A (2012) The application of traditional and geometric morphometric analyses for forensic quantification of sexual dimorphism: preliminary investigations in a Western Australian population. Int J Legal Med 126(4):549–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0684-8

  8. 8.

    Bilfeld MF, Dedouit F, Sans N, Rousseau H, Rougé D, Telmon N (2013) Ontogeny of size and shape sexual dimorphism in the ilium: a multislice computed tomography study by geometric morphometry. J Forensic Sci 58:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12037

  9. 9.

    Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  10. 10.

    Toledo Avelar LE, Cardoso MA, Santos Bordoni L, de Miranda AL, de Miranda Avelar JV (2017) Aging and sexual differences of the human skull. Plast Reconstr Surg - Global Open 5:e1297. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001297

  11. 11.

    Coquerelle M, Bookstein FL, Braga J, Halazonetis D, Weber GW, Mitteroecker P (2011) Sexual dimorphism of the human mandible and its association with dental development. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:192–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21485

  12. 12.

    Coqueugniot H, Giacobini G, Malerba (2002) L’utilisation de caractères morphologiques dans la diagnose sexuelle des mandibules d’enfants. Bulletins et mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris http://bmsap.revues.org/483.

  13. 13.

    Franklin D, Oxnard CE, O’Higgins P, Dadour I (2007) Sexual dimorphism in the subadult mandible: quantification using geometric morphometrics. J Forensic Sci 52:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00311.x

  14. 14.

    Guyomarc’h P, Dutailly B, Charton J, Santos F, Desbarats P, Coqueugniot H (2014) Anthropological facial approximation in three dimensions (AFA3D): computer-assisted estimation of the facial morphology using geometric morphometrics. J Forensic Sci 59:1502–1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12547

  15. 15.

    Walsh JS (2015) Normal bone physiology, remodelling and its hormonal regulation. Surgery (Oxford) 33:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2014.10.010

  16. 16.

    RStudio, Inc (2009–2018). RStudio: integrated development for R. Rstudio, Inc., Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/

  17. 17.

    Giles E (1964) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 22:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330220212

  18. 18.

    Giles E, Elliot O (1963) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. Am J Phys Anthropol 21:53–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330210108

  19. 19.

    Vezzetti E, Marcolin F, Tornincasa S et al (2016) Facial landmarks for forensic skull-based 3D face reconstruction: a literature review. In: De Paolis LT, Mongelli A (eds) Augmented reality, virtual reality, and computer graphics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 172–180

  20. 20.

    Zaafrane M, Ben Khelil M, Naccache I, Ezzedine E, Savall F, Telmon N, Mnif N, Hamdoun M (2018) Sex determination of a Tunisian population by CT scan analysis of the skull. Int J Legal Med 132:853–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1688-1

  21. 21.

    Zelditch LM, Swiderski DL, Sheets DH (2012) Geometric morphometrics for biologists, 2nd edn. Elsevier/Academic Press, New York

  22. 22.

    He Q, Duan Y, Karsch K, Miles J (2010) Detecting corpus callosum abnormalities in autism based on anatomical landmarks. Psychiatry Res 183:126–132

  23. 23.

    Smith RJ (1999) Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. J Hum Evol 36(4):423–458

  24. 24.

    Oettlé AC, Pretorius E, Steyn M (2009) Geometric morphometric analysis of the use of mandibular gonial eversion in sex determination. HOMO 60:29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2007.01.003

  25. 25.

    Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I (2007) Sexual dimorphism and population variation in the adult mandible. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 3(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:3:1:15

  26. 26.

    Kharoshah MAA, Almadani O, Ghaleb SS, Zaki MK, Fattah YAA (2010) Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a modern Egyptian population. J Forensic Leg Med 17(4):213–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2010.02.005

  27. 27.

    Marinescu M, Panaitescu V, Rosu M (2013) Sex determination in Romanian mandible using discriminant function analysis: comparative results of a time-efficient method. Rom J Leg Med 21:305–308. https://doi.org/10.4323/rjlm.2013.305

  28. 28.

    Dong H, Deng M, Wang W, Zhang J, Mu J, Zhu G (2015) Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a contemporary Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int 255:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.06.010

  29. 29.

    Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I (2008) Discriminant function sexing of the mandible of Indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 179:84.e1–84.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.03.014

  30. 30.

    de Oliveira GT, Alves MC, Haiter-Neto F (2016) Mandibular sexual dimorphism analysis in CBCT scans. J Forensic Leg Med 38:106–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.024

  31. 31.

    Alias A, Ibrahim A, Bakar SNA et al (2018) Anthropometric analysis of mandible: an important step for sex determination. Clin Ter 169(5):e217–e223. https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2018.2082

  32. 32.

    Mahakkanukrauh P, Sinthubua A, Prasitwattanaseree S, Ruengdit S, Singsuwan P, Praneatpolgrang S, Duangto P (2015) Craniometric study for sex determination in a Thai population. Anat Cell Biol 48(4):275–283. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2015.48.4.275

  33. 33.

    Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A (2013) Estimation of sex from cranial measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int 229:158.e1–158.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.005

  34. 34.

    Yaşar Işcan M, Steyn M (1999) Craniometric determination of population affinity in South Africans. Int J Leg Med 112(2):91–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140050208

  35. 35.

    Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N (2005) Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South African crania. HOMO 55(3):213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2004.08.001

  36. 36.

    Noble J, Cardini A, Flavel A, Franklin D (2019) Geometric morphometrics on juvenile crania: exploring age and sex variation in an Australian population. Forensic Sci Int 294:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.10.022

  37. 37.

    Kimmerle EH, Ross A, Slice D (2008) Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region. J Forensic Sci 53:54–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00627.x

  38. 38.

    Green H, Curnoe D (2009) Sexual dimorphism in Southeast Asian crania: a geometric morphometric approach. HOMO 60:517–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.001

  39. 39.

    Bejdová Š, Dupej J, Krajíček V, Velemínská J, Velemínský P (2018) Stability of upper face sexual dimorphism in central European populations (Czech Republic) during the modern age. Int J Legal Med 132(1):321–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1625-3

  40. 40.

    Poulsen K, Simonsen J (2015) Computed tomography as routine in connection with medico-legal autopsies. Forensic Sci Int 171:190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.041

  41. 41.

    Dedouit F, Savall F, Mokrane F-Z et al (2014) Virtual anthropology and forensic identification using multidetector CT. Br J Radiology 87:20130468. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130468

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Frédéric Savall.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Claudia Gillet and Leonor Costa-Mendes contributed equally to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gillet, C., Costa-Mendes, L., Rérolle, C. et al. Sex estimation in the cranium and mandible: a multislice computed tomography (MSCT) study using anthropometric and geometric morphometry methods. Int J Legal Med (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02203-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Forensic science
  • Forensic anthropology
  • Sex estimation
  • Geometric morphometry
  • Skull
  • Mandible