Advertisement

Genetic polymorphisms and mutation rates of 16 X-STRs in a Han Chinese population of Beijing and application examples in second-degree kinship cases

  • Man Chen
  • He Ren
  • Zhiyong Liu
  • Jing Zhao
  • Chong Chen
  • Yan Shi
  • Li Jia
  • Feng Cheng
  • Tong Chen
  • Qingwei Fan
  • Yaran Yang
  • Yacheng Liu
  • Gengqian ZhangEmail author
  • Jiangwei YanEmail author
Short Communication

Abstract

As a supplementary tool in forensic cases, X chromosomal short tandem repeats (X-STRs) might bridge large pedigree gaps and bring inspiration to forensic practices for the special mode of inheritance. To standardize the application of X-STRs, the DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) presented recommendations concentrating on biostatistical evaluations. Following this guideline, in this study, 1247 (655 females and 592 males) unrelated individuals and 770 families originating from a Han Chinese population of Beijing were investigated with 16 X-STRs. The combined PDF and PDM were 0.999999999999994 and 0.999999997, respectively. The combined MECKrüger, MECKishida, MECDesmarais, and MECDesmarais duo were 0.999972736708864, 0.999999975670766, 0.999999975720931, and 0.999993489709197, respectively. In addition, a population comparison demonstrated that genetic heterogeneity widely exists between the Han population of Beijing and other populations, especially southern Han Chinese, European, and West African populations. Additionally, the overall mutation rates of the paternal and maternal germlines of the 16 X-STRs were 0.0021 and 0.0003, respectively. Among them, HPRTB showed the highest paternal mutation rate of 0.0094. Finally, based on these forensic parameters, the likelihood ratios of four second-degree kinship cases were evaluated. Comparing with autosomal STR, X-STR showed significant advantages for hypothesis exclusion. Our study indicated that the 16 X-STR loci are highly polymorphic in the Han population of Beijing and could be a satisfactory complimentary tool for forensic applications.

Keywords

X-STRs Genetic polymorphism Mutation rate Chinese Beijing Han population Kinship testing 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no completing interests.

Supplementary material

414_2019_2047_MOESM1_ESM.docx (125 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 124 kb)
414_2019_2047_MOESM2_ESM.docx (109 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 108 kb)
414_2019_2047_MOESM3_ESM.docx (108 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 108 kb)
414_2019_2047_MOESM4_ESM.docx (108 kb)
ESM 4 (DOCX 108 kb)
414_2019_2047_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (56 kb)
ESM 5 (XLSX 56.4 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hearne CM, Todd JA (1991) Tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism at the HPRT locus. Nucleic Acids Res 19:5450Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang X, Wu W, Chen L, Liu CH, Zhang XF, Chen L, Feng XL, Wang HJ, Liu C (2016) Development of the 19 X-STR loci multiplex system and genetic analysis of a Zhejiang Han population in China. Electrophoresis 37:2260–2272.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201500540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun K, Zhao S, Tian H, Zhang S, Li C (2013) Development of the 16 X-STR loci typing system and genetic analysis in a Shanghai Han population from China. Electrophoresis 34:3008–3015.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201300234 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu QL, Wang JZ, Quan L, Zhao H, Wu YD, Huang XL, Lu DJ (2013) Allele and haplotype diversity of 26 X-STR loci in four nationality populations from China. PLoS One 8:e65570.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prieto-Fernandez E, Baeta M, Nunez C et al (2016) Development of a new highly efficient 17 X-STR multiplex for forensic purposes. Electrophoresis 37:1651–1658.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201500546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu QL, Zhao H, Chen JD, Wang XG, Lu DJ, Quan L (2012) Development and population study of the 12 X-STR loci multiplexes PCR systems. Int J Legal Med 126:665–670.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0676-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Szibor R (2007) X-chromosomal markers: past, present and future. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1:93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fukuta M, Gaballah MH, Kato H, Aoki Y (2018) A simple method for calculating the likelihood ratio in a kinship test using X-chromosomal markers incorporating linkage, linkage disequilibrium, and mutation. Legal Med 32:9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tillmar AO, Kling D, Butler JM, Parson W, Prinz M, Schneider PM, Egeland T, Gusmão L (2017) DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): guidelines on the use of X-STRs in kinship analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet 29:269–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    García MG, Gusmão L, Catanesi CI, Penacino GA, Pinto N (2017) Mutation rate of 12 X-STRs from investigator Argus X-12 kit in Argentine population. Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement 6Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diegoli TM, Linacre A, Schanfield MS, Coble MD (2014) Mutation rates of 15 X chromosomal short tandem repeat markers. Int J Legal Med 128:579–587.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1016-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu QL, Lu DJ, Quan L, Chen YF, Shen M, Zhao H (2012) Development of multiplex PCR system with 15 X-STR loci and genetic analysis in three nationality populations from China. Electrophoresis 33:1299–1305.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201100558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu YJ, Guo LH, Yue JT, Shi MS (2016) Forensic application of 16 X-STR loci in Henan Han population. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi 32: 420–423. doi:  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-5619.2016.06.006
  14. 14.
    Gao HM, Wang C, Han SY, Sun SH, Xiao DJ, Wang YS, Li CT, Zhang MX (2017) Analysis of the 19 Y-STR and 16 X-STR loci system in the Han population of Shandong province, China. Genetics and molecular research : GMR 16.  https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16019573
  15. 15.
    Shin SH, Yu JS, Park SW, Min GS, Chung KW (2005) Genetic analysis of 18 X-linked short tandem repeat markers in Korean population. Forensic Sci Int 147:35–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prieto-Fernandez E, Diaz-de Usera A, Baeta M et al (2017) A genetic overview of Atlantic coastal populations from Europe and North-West Africa based on a 17 X-STR panel. Forensic Sci Int Genet 27:167–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higushi R (2013) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 10(4): 506−13 (April 1991). Biotechniques 54: 134–139. doi:  https://doi.org/10.2144/000114018
  18. 18.
    Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2007) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinformatics Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kling D, Egeland T, Tillmar AO (2012) FamLink--a user friendly software for linkage calculations in family genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:616–620.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kling D, Dell'Amico B, Tillmar AO (2015) FamLinkX - implementation of a general model for likelihood computations for X-chromosomal marker data. Forensic Sci Int Genet 17:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phillips C, Ballard D, Gill P, Court DS, Carracedo A, Lareu MV (2012) The recombination landscape around forensic STRs: accurate measurement of genetic distances between syntenic STR pairs using HapMap high density SNP data. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:354–365.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xie B, Chen L, Yang Y, Lv Y, Chen J, Shi Y, Chen C, Zhao H, Yu Z, Liu Y, Fang X, Yan J (2015) Genetic distribution of 39 STR loci in 1027 unrelated Han individuals from Northern China. Forensic Sci Int Genet 19:205–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gill P, Hicks T, Butler JM, Connolly E, Gusmão L, Kokshoorn B, Morling N, van Oorschot RAH, Parson W, Prinz M, Schneider PM, Sijen T, Taylor D (2018) DNA commission of the international society for forensic genetics: assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions. Forensic Sci Int Genet 36:189–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019
corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of GenomicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Beijing Police CollegeBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Beijing Tongda Shoucheng Institute of Forensic ScienceBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.School of Forensic MedicineShanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations