Advertisement

International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 133, Issue 2, pp 561–564 | Cite as

Death by anaphylactic shock in an institution: an accident or negligence?

  • Sandra BurkhardtEmail author
  • Pia Genet
  • Sara Sabatasso
  • Romano La Harpe
Case Report

Abstract

This is a description of a man, institutionalised for learning difficulties, known to have an allergy to seafood. After eating a pie, the patient quickly developed dyspnoea and vomiting. The staff at the institution administered epinephrine and called the emergency services. Despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the patient died shortly after being admitted to the emergency department of the University Hospitals of Geneva. In the light of the circumstances of the death and of a discrepancy between the information given to the police by the staff at the institution looking after the patient on the one hand, and the preliminary elements of the investigation on the other hand, it was suspected that there was failure in care of the patient and our institute was asked to carry out an autopsy. Basing on all the investigations carried out, the cause of death was anaphylactic reaction following the ingestion of seafood, contrary to what had been alleged by the staff at the home.

Keywords

Anaphylaxis Seafood Death 

References

  1. 1.
    Steensma D (2003) The kiss of death: a severe allergic reaction to a selfish induced by a good-night kiss. May Clin Proc 78:221–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taylor SL (2008) Molluscan shellfish allergy. Adv Food Nutr Res 54:139–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brzezinski J (2005) Detection of crustacean DNA and species identification using a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. J of Food Protection 68(9):1866–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Munoz-Furlong A, Weiss CC (2009) Characteristics of food-allergic patients placing them at risk for a fatal anaphylactic episode. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 9(1):57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khora SS (2016) Seafood-associated shellfish allergy: a comprehensive review. Immunol Investig 45(6):504–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan-Fai C, Po-Hon C, Ching-Feng H, Tzee-Chung W (2014) Emergency department visits for food allergy in Taiwan: a retrospective study. Pediatrics and Neonatology 55:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Low I, Stables S (2006) Anaphylactic deaths in Auckland, New Zealand: a review of coronial autopsies from 1985 to 2005. Pathology 38(4):328–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Santaclara F, Pérez-Martin R, Sotelo C (2014) Developed of a method for the genetic identification of ling species (Genypterus spp.) in seafood products by FINS methodology. Food Chem 143:22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Center of Legal MedicineGeneva 4Switzerland

Personalised recommendations