Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A test and analysis of Calce (2012) method for skeletal age-at-death estimation using the acetabulum in a modern skeletal sample

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In forensic anthropology, the age-at-death of an adult individual is one of the most complex parameters of the biological profile to estimate. The present study aims to evaluate the reliability of the Calce (2012) method for the estimation of age-at-death through acetabulum changes in a sample of Portuguese origin. This method consists of the global analysis of acetabular age-related morphology with focus on three specific traits, namely the acetabular groove, the osteophyte development of the acetabular rim, and the apex growth. This method was tested in 120 individuals sampled from the Twenty-first Century Identified Skeletal Collection (University of Coimbra, Portugal). The test sample is composed of 60 males and 60 females, aged between 25 and 99 years, with well-preserved os coxae. The results showed that only 60% of the individuals were correctly attributed to the age group defined by the technique. The comparison with previous studies in other populations shows significant inter-population differences in the relationship between the acetabulum variables used by Calce and age-at-death. The obtained results advise caution in the use of the Calce (2012) method to estimate the age-at-death of unidentified skeletons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dirkmaat DC, Cabo LL, Ousley SD, Symes SA (2008) New perspectives in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 137:33–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Márquez-Grant N (2015) An overview of age estimation in forensic anthropology: perspectives and practical considerations. Ann Hum Biol 42:308–322. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2015.1048288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buckberry J (2015) The (mis)use of adult age estimates in osteology. Ann Hum Biol 42:323–331. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2015.1046926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rösing FW, Graw M, Marré B, Ritz-Timme S, Rothschild MA, Rötzscher K, Schmeling A, Schröder I, Geserick G (2007) Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons. Homo 58:75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2005.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mays S (2015) The effect of factors other than age upon skeletal age indicators in the adult. Ann Hum Biol 42:332–341. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2015.1044470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Collins MJ, Waite ER, Schütz HW, Kaatsch HJ, Borrman HIM (2000) Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise. Int J Legal Med 113:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140050283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunha E, Baccino E, Martrille L, Ramsthaler F, Prieto J, Schuliar Y, Lynnerup N, Cattaneo C (2009) The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review. Forensic Sci Int 193:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Franklin D (2010) Forensic age estimation in human skeletal remains: current concepts and future directions. Legal Med 12:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garvin HM, Passalacqua NV (2012) Current practices by forensic anthropologists in adult skeletal age estimation. J Forensic Sci 57:427–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01979.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rougé-Maillart C, Telmon N, Rissech C, Malgosa A, Rougé D (2004) The determination of male adult age at death by central and posterior coxal analysis: a preliminary study. J Forensic Sci 49:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs2002056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rougé-Maillart C, Jousset N, Vielle B, Gaudin A, Telmon N (2007) Contribution of the study of acetabulum for the estimation of adult subjects. Forensic Sci Int 171:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rissech C, Estabrook GF, Cunha E, Malgosa A (2006) Using the acetabulum to estimate age at death of adult males. J Forensic Sci 51:213–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00060.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rissech C, Estabrook GF, Cunha E, Malgosa A (2007) Estimation of age-at-death for adult males using the acetabulum, applied to four Western European populations. J Forensic Sci 52:774–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00486.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rougé-Maillart C, Vielle B, Jousset N, Chappard D, Telmon N, Cunha E (2009) Development of a method to estimate skeletal age at death in adults using the acetabulum and the auricular surface on a Portuguese population. Forensic Sci Int 188:91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Venara A, Martrille L, Godin M, Kerdat C, Deguette C, Chapard D, Rouge-Maillart C (2013) Estimation of skeletal age at death in adults using the acetabulum and the auricular surface – an application on the Terry collection. Rev Méd Lég 4:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medleg.2013.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Calce SE, Rogers TL (2011) Evaluation of age estimation technique: testing traits of the acetabulum to estimate age at death in adult males. J Forensic Sci 56:302–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01700.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Calce SE (2012) A new method to estimate adult age-at-death using the acetabulum. Am J Phys Anthropol 148:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mays S (2012) An investigation of age-related changes at the acetabulum in 18th-19th century ad adult skeletons from Christ Church Spitalfields, London. Am J Phys Anthropol 149:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mays S (2014) A test of a recently devised method of estimating skeletal age at death using features of the adult acetabulum. J Forensic Sci 59:184–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferreira MT, Vicente R, Navega D et al (2014) A new forensic collection housed at the University of Coimbra, Portugal: the 21st century identified skeletal collection. Forensic Sci Int 245:202.e1–202.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhapkar VP (1966) A note on the equivalence of two test criteria for hypotheses in categorical data. J Am Stat Assoc 61:228–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1966.10502021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bishop YM, Light RJ, Mosteller F (2007) Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cover TM, Thomas JA (2005) Elements of information theory, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Powers D (2011) Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness & correlation. J Mach Learn Technol 2:37–63

    Google Scholar 

  27. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rissech C (2013) Letter to the editor: comments on “a new method to estimate adult age-at-death using the acetabulum” (Calce, 2012). Am J Phys Anthropol 151:331–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Calce SE (2013) Notes and comments: reply to Rissech’s letter. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:333–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Botha D, Pretorius S, Myburgh J, Steyn M (2016) Age estimation from the acetabulum in South African black males. Int J Legal Med 130:809–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1299-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. San-Millán M, Rissech C, Turbón D (2017) New approach to age estimation of male and female adult skeletons based on the morphological characteristics of the acetabulum. Int J Legal Med 131:501–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1406-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Milner GR, Boldsen JL (2012) Transition analysis: a validation study with known-age modern American skeletons. Am J Phys Anthropol 148:98–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Navega D, Coelho J, d’Oliveira Cunha E, Curate F (2017) DXAGE: a new method for age at death estimation based on femoral bone mineral density and artificial neural networks. J Forensic Sci 63:497–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Miranker M (2016) A comparison of different age estimation methods of the adult pelvis. J Forensic Sci 61:1173–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The co-authors David Navega [SFRH/BD/99676/2014] and Maria Teresa Ferreira [SFRH/BPD/11710/2015] were financed by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    David Navega, Maria Godinho, Eugénia Cunha & Maria Teresa Ferreira

  2. Laboratório de Antropologia Forense, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade de Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal

    David Navega

  3. Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Maria Godinho

Authors
  1. David Navega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Godinho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eugénia Cunha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria Teresa Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Navega.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navega, D., Godinho, M., Cunha, E. et al. A test and analysis of Calce (2012) method for skeletal age-at-death estimation using the acetabulum in a modern skeletal sample. Int J Legal Med 132, 1447–1455 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1902-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1902-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation