Estimating age and the probability of being at least 18 years of age using third molars: a comparison between Black and White individuals living in South Africa
Third molar development of 705 White and 563 Black South African individuals aged between 15 and 25 years was assessed from panoramic radiographs obtained from the School of Dentistry, University of Pretoria, South Africa. The maxillary and mandibular left third molars were scored according to a ten-stage scoring system. Ancestry and sex differences in dental maturity were assessed, and the likelihood of an individual being 18 years of age was determined for each developmental stage. Statistically significant differences were noted among ancestry groups for most developmental stages, with South African Black individuals consistently maturing earlier than the White individuals. Statistically significant differences were noted among sex groups for some of the stages, mostly those near the final stages of root development. The results indicate that male third molars completed their development faster than that of females. The likelihood of an individual being 18 years of age based on the third molar development stage for the maxilla and mandible on its own was also determined. Combined likelihood results, for the maxillary and mandibular left third molars for stage H, increased the likelihood of being 18 years to 95% for all the studied ancestry and sex groups.
KeywordsThird molars South African Black and White individuals Root formation Dental maturation
The researchers would like to acknowledge funding received from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa. Any opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and therefore, the NRF does not accept any liability in regard thereto.
Compliance with ethical standards
The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid down by the Declaration of Helsinki . Approval for the study was granted by the University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health Sciences (Ethics reference number: 263/2015).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Thevissen PW, Kvaal SI, Dierickx K, Willems G (2012) Ethics in age estimation of unaccompanied minors. J Forensic Odontostomatol 30:85–102Google Scholar
- 2.Campbell EK (2006) Reflections on illegal immigration in Botswana and South Africa. Etude la Popul Africaine 21:1–23Google Scholar
- 3.Pelser E (2008) Learning to be lost: YOUTH crime in South Africa. Discussion Paper for the Hsrc Youth Policy Initiative, pp 1–14Google Scholar
- 4.Census Bureau (2012) Statistical release ( Revised ) Census 2011, p 78Google Scholar
- 32.Kullman L, Johanson G, Akesson L (1992) Root development of the lower third molar and its relation to chronological age. Swed Dent J 161–167Google Scholar