Risk of cataract removal surgery in Mayak PA workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation over prolonged periods
- 9 Downloads
In this study, the risk of cataract removal surgery was assessed in a cohort of workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation over a prolonged period. The study cohort includes 22,377 workers of the Mayak Production Association (about 25% of whom are females) first employed at one of the main facilities in 1948–1982, who were followed up to the end of 2008. Dose estimates used in the study are provided by the Mayak Worker Dosimetry System 2008. The mean cumulative dose from external γ-rays [personal dose equivalent Hp(10)] is 0.54 ± 0.76 Sv for males and 0.44 ± 0.65 Sv for females. The mean cumulative doses from neutrons (personal dose equivalent Hp(10)n) were 0.034 ± 0.080 Sv for males and 0.033 ± 0.092 Sv for females. Relative risks and excess relative risks per unit dose were calculated based on maximum likelihood. Among 4,177 workers diagnosed with a verified diagnosis of senile cataract, 701 lens removal surgeries (16.7%) were performed by the end of the follow-up period. The risk of cataract removal surgery was shown to be significantly associated with non-radiation factors such as sex, attained age, smoking, an ocular comorbidity (e.g., glaucoma), and a somatic comorbidity (e.g., diabetes mellitus). There was no significant association of cataract removal surgery with external γ-dose regardless of inclusion of the neutron dose adjustment with either linear or non-linear models. It is concluded that cataract removal surgery rate may not be a highly sensitive and specific indicator that could serve as a surrogate for radiation-related cataracts.
KeywordsMayak workers Cataract removal surgery Risk Chronic occupational radiation exposures
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The present record-based epidemiological study did not require any contact with cohort members. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI) reviewed and approved the study, and confirmed that no signed consents were needed from members of the study cohort.
- Azizova TV, Day RD, Wald N, Muirhead CR, O’Hagan JA, Sumina MV, Belyaeva ZD, Druzhinina MB, Teplyakov II, Semenikhina NG, Stetsenko LA, Grigoryeva ES, Krupenina LN, Vlasenko EV (2008) The “Clinic” medical-dosimetric database of Mayak production association workers: structure, characteristics and prospects of utilization. Health Phys 94:449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dauer LT, Ainsbury EA, Dynlacht J, Hoel D, Klein BEK, Mayer D, Prescott CR, Thornton RH, Vano E, Woloschak GE, Flannery CM, Goldstein LE, Hamada N, Tran PK, Grissom MP, Blakely EA (2017) Guidance on radiation dose limits for the lens of the eye: overview of the recommendations in NCRP Commentary No. 26. Int J Radiat Biol 93:1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hayashida T, Sasaki H, Hamada N, Tatsuzaki H, Hatsusaki N, Akahane K, Yokoyama S (2017) Issues behind radiation management of workers at Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant of Tokyo Electric Power Company—from the viewpoint of radiation exposure of the ocular lens and the biological effects to the lens. Jpn J Health Phys 52:88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ICRP (2007) 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:2–4Google Scholar
- ICRP (2012) ICRP publication 118: Statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs—threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 41(1–2):1–322Google Scholar
- Khokhryakov VV, Khokhryakov VF, Suslova KG, Vostrotin VV, Vvedensky VE, Sokolova AB, Krahenbuhl MP, Birchall A, Miller SC, Schadilov AE, Ephimov AV (2013) Mayak Worker Dosimetry System 2008 (MWDS-2008): Assessment of internal alpha-dose from measurement results of plutonium activity in urine. Health Phys 104:366–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Little MP, Kitahara CM, Cahoon EK, Bernier MO, Velazquez-Kronen R, Doody MM, Borrego D, Miller JS, Alexander BH, Simon SL, Prewton DL, Hamada N, Linet MS, Meyer C (2018) Occupational radiation exposure and risk of cataract incidence in a cohort of US radiologic technologists. Eur J Epidemiol 33:1179–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NCRP (2016) Guidance on radiation dose limits for the lens of the eye. NCRP Commentary No. 26. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- Preston D, Lubin J, Pierce D, McConney M (1993) Epicure users guide. Hirosoft, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- WHO (1980) ICD-9 guidelines for coding diseases, injuries and causes of death/revision 1975. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Worgul BV, Kundiyev YI, Sergiyenko NM, Chumak VV, Vitte PM, Medvedovsky C, Bakhanova EV, Junk AK, Kyrychenko OY, Musijachenko NV, Shylo SA, Vitte OP, Xu S, Xue X, Shore RE (2007) Cataracts among Chernobyl clean-up workers: implications regarding permissible eye exposures. Radiat Res 167:233–243ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar