Neural processing of the own child’s facial emotions in mothers with a history of early life maltreatment

  • Corinne NeukelEmail author
  • Sabine C. Herpertz
  • Catherine Hinid-Attar
  • Anna-Lena Zietlow
  • Anna Fuchs
  • Eva Moehler
  • Felix Bermpohl
  • Katja Bertsch
Original Paper


Early life maltreatment (ELM) has long-lasting effects on social interaction. When interacting with their own child, women with ELM often report difficulties in parenting and show reduced maternal sensitivity. Sensitive maternal behavior requires the recognition of the child’s emotional state depicted in its facial emotions. Based on previous studies, it can be expected that ELM affects the neural processing of facial emotions by altering activation patterns in parts of the brain’s empathy and mentalizing networks. However, so far studies have focused on the processing of standardized, adult facial emotions. Therefore, the current study investigated the impact of ELM on the processing of one’s own child’s facial emotions using functional magnetic resonance imaging. To achieve this, 27 mothers with and 26 mothers without a history of ELM (all without current mental disorders and psychopharmacological treatment) took part in an emotional face recognition paradigm with happy, sad, and neutral faces of their own and an unknown primary school-aged child of the same age and sex. We found elevated activations in regions of the mentalizing (superior temporal sulcus, precuneus) and mirror neuron (inferior parietal lobule) networks as well as in the visual face processing network (cuneus, middle temporal gyrus) in mothers with ELM compared to the non-maltreated mothers in response to happy faces of their own child. This suggests a more effortful processing and cognitive empathic mentalizing of the own child’s facial happiness in mothers with ELM. Future research should address whether this might indicate a compensatory recruitment of mentalizing capacities to maintain maternal sensitivity.


Trauma Physical and sexual abuse Maternal brain Facial emotion recognition Functional magnetic resonance imaging Mentalizing 



We thank J. Rausch and E. Mielke for their help with data collection, and I. Rek and K. Hillmann for participant recruitment and organization. The study was supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research to SC.H. (BMBF; 01KR1207A; coordinator: R.B.) The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research had no influence on study design or manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Butchart A, Mikton C (2014) Global status report on violence prevention, 2014Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stoltenborgh M, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Alink LR, IJzendoorn MH (2015) The prevalence of child maltreatment across the globe: review of a series of meta-analyses. Child Abuse Rev 24(1):37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batten SV, Aslan M, Maciejewski PK, Mazure CM (2004) Childhood maltreatment as a risk factor for adult cardiovascular disease and depression. J Clin Psychiatry 65(2):249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Widom CS, DuMont K, Czaja SJ (2007) A prospective investigation of major depressive disorder and comorbidity in abused and neglected children grown up. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64(1):49–56. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cougle JR, Timpano KR, Sachs-Ericsson N, Keough ME, Riccardi CJ (2010) Examining the unique relationships between anxiety disorders and childhood physical and sexual abuse in the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication. Psychiatry Res 177(1):150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibrahim J, Cosgrave N, Woolgar M (2017) Childhood maltreatment and its link to borderline personality disorder features in children: a systematic review approach. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 23:57–76 (1359104517712778) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Varese F, Smeets F, Drukker M, Lieverse R, Lataster T, Viechtbauer W, Read J, van Os J, Bentall RP (2012) Childhood adversities increase the risk of psychosis: a meta-analysis of patient-control, prospective- and cross-sectional cohort studies. Schizophr Bull 38:661–671. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DiLillo D, Damashek A (2003) Parenting characteristics of women reporting a history of childhood sexual abuse. Child Maltreat 8(4):319–333. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moehler E, Biringen Z, Poustka L (2007) Emotional availability in a sample of mothers with a history of abuse. Am J Orthopsychiatry 77(4):624–628. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roberts R, O’Connor T, Dunn J, Golding J (2004) The effects of child sexual abuse in later family life; mental health, parenting and adjustment of offspring. Child Abuse Negl 28(5):525–545. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bailey HN, DeOliveira CA, Wolfe VV, Evans EM, Hartwick C (2012) The impact of childhood maltreatment history on parenting: a comparison of maltreatment types and assessment methods. Child Abuse Negl 36(3):236–246. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fuchs A, Mohler E, Resch F, Kaess M (2015) Impact of a maternal history of childhood abuse on the development of mother–infant interaction during the first year of life. Child Abuse Negl 48:179–189. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kluczniok D, Boedeker K, Fuchs A, Hindi Attar C, Fydrich T, Fuehrer D, Dittrich K, Reck C, Winter S, Heinz A, Herpertz SC, Brunner R, Bermpohl F (2016) emotional availability in mother–child interaction: the effects of maternal depression in remission and additional history of childhood abuse. Depress Anxiety 33(7):648–657. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mielke EL, Neukel C, Bertsch K, Reck C, Mohler E, Herpertz SC (2016) Maternal sensitivity and the empathic brain: Influences of early life maltreatment. J Psychiatr Res 77:59–66. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leerkes EM, Blankson AN, O’Brien M (2009) Differential effects of maternal sensitivity to infant distress and nondistress on social-emotional functioning. Child Dev 80(3):762–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raby KL, Roisman GI, Fraley RC, Simpson JA (2015) The enduring predictive significance of early maternal sensitivity: Social and academic competence through age 32 years. Child Dev 86(3):695–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI (2000) The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci 4(6):223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hein TC, Monk CS (2017) Research Review: neural response to threat in children, adolescents, and adults after child maltreatment—a quantitative meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 58(3):222–230. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luo L, Ma X, Zheng X, Zhao W, Xu L, Becker B, Kendrick KM (2015) Neural systems and hormones mediating attraction to infant and child faces. Front Psychol 6:970. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leibenluft E, Gobbini MI, Harrison T, Haxby JV (2004) Mothers’ neural activation in response to pictures of their children and other children. Biol Psychiatry 56(4):225–232. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nitschke JB, Nelson EE, Rusch BD, Fox AS, Oakes TR, Davidson RJ (2004) Orbitofrontal cortex tracks positive mood in mothers viewing pictures of their newborn infants. NeuroImage 21(2):583–592. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strathearn L, Li J, Fonagy P, Montague PR (2008) What’s in a smile? Maternal brain responses to infant facial cues. Pediatrics 122(1):40–51. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barrett J, Wonch KE, Gonzalez A, Ali N, Steiner M, Hall GB, Fleming AS (2012) Maternal affect and quality of parenting experiences are related to amygdala response to infant faces. Soc Neurosci 7(3):252–268. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kluczniok D, Hindi Attar C, Stein J, Poppinga S, Fydrich T, Jaite C, Kappel V, Brunner R, Herpertz SC, Boedeker K, Bermpohl F (2017) Dissociating maternal responses to sad and happy facial expressions of their own child: an fMRI study. PloS One 12(8):e0182476. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neukel C, Bertsch K, Fuchs Ph DA, Zietlow AL, Reck C, Moehler E, Brunner R, Bermpohl F, Herpertz SC (2018) The maternal brain in women with a history of early-life maltreatment: an imagination-based fMRI study of conflictual versus pleasant interactions with children. J Psychiatry Neurosci 43(4):170026. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bifulco A, Brown GW, Harris TO (1994) Childhood experience of care and abuse (CECA): a retrospective interview measure. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 35(8):1419–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thabrew H, de Sylva S, Romans S (2012) Evaluating childhood adversity. In: Fava GA, Sonino N, Wise TN (eds) The psychosomatic assessment, vol 32. Karger Publishers, Basel, pp 35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC (1998) The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 59(Suppl 20):22–33 (quiz 34–57) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loranger AW, Sartorius N, Andreoli A, Berger P, Buchheim P, Channabasavanna S, Coid B, Dahl A, Diekstra RF, Ferguson B (1994) The international personality disorder examination: the World Health Organization/Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration international pilot study of personality disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51(3):215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23(1):56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H (2016) Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 28:201602413Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Volman I, von Borries AKL, Bulten BH, Verkes RJ, Toni I, Roelofs K (2016) Testosterone modulates altered prefrontal control of emotional actions in psychopathic offenders. ENeuro 3(1):ENEURO0107 (0107-0115.2016) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bertsch K, Roelofs K, Roch PJ, Ma B, Hensel S, Herpertz SC, Volman I (2018) Neural correlates of emotional action control in anger-prone women with borderline personality disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci 43(3):161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Frith CD, Frith U (2006) The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4):531–534. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kanske P, Bockler A, Trautwein FM, Singer T (2015) Dissecting the social brain: Introducing the EmpaToM to reveal distinct neural networks and brain-behavior relations for empathy and Theory of Mind. NeuroImage 122:6–19. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schurz M, Radua J, Aichhorn M, Richlan F, Perner J (2014) Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 42:9–34. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cattaneo L, Rizzolatti G (2009) The mirror neuron system. Arch Neurol 66(5):557–560. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB (2012) Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36(1):341–349. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schulte-Rüther M, Markowitsch HJ, Fink GR, Piefke M (2007) Mirror neuron and theory of mind mechanisms involved in face-to-face interactions: a functional magnetic resonance imaging approach to empathy. J Cognit Neurosci 19(8):1354–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Morgan JK, Guo C, Moses-Kolko EL, Phillips ML, Stepp SD, Hipwell AE (2017) Postpartum depressive symptoms moderate the link between mothers’ neural response to positive faces in reward and social regions and observed caregiving. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 12(10):1605–1613. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Parlar M, Frewen P, Nazarov A, Oremus C, MacQueen G, Lanius R, McKinnon MC (2014) Alterations in empathic responding among women with posttraumatic stress disorder associated with childhood trauma. Brain Behav 4(3):381–389. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aminoff EM, Kveraga K, Bar M (2013) The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition. Trends Cognit Sci 17(8):379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kim P, Leckman JF, Mayes LC, Feldman R, Wang X, Swain JE (2010) The plasticity of human maternal brain: longitudinal changes in brain anatomy during the early postpartum period. Behav Neurosci 124(5):695–700. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Laurent HK, Ablow JC (2013) A face a mother could love: depression-related maternal neural responses to infant emotion faces. Soc Neurosci 8(3):228–239. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schechter DS, Moser DA, Wang Z, Marsh R, Hao X, Duan Y, Yu S, Gunter B, Murphy D, McCaw J, Kangarlu A, Willheim E, Myers MM, Hofer MA, Peterson BS (2012) An fMRI study of the brain responses of traumatized mothers to viewing their toddlers during separation and play. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 7(8):969–979. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corinne Neukel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sabine C. Herpertz
    • 1
  • Catherine Hinid-Attar
    • 2
  • Anna-Lena Zietlow
    • 3
  • Anna Fuchs
    • 4
  • Eva Moehler
    • 4
  • Felix Bermpohl
    • 2
  • Katja Bertsch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial MedicineUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity Medicine BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial MedicineUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  4. 4.Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial MedicineUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations