Neural correlates of instrumental responding in the context of alcohol-related cues index disorder severity and relapse risk
- 363 Downloads
The influence of Pavlovian conditioned stimuli on ongoing behavior may contribute to explaining how alcohol cues stimulate drug seeking and intake. Using a Pavlovian-instrumental transfer task, we investigated the effects of alcohol-related cues on approach behavior (i.e., instrumental response behavior) and its neural correlates, and related both to the relapse after detoxification in alcohol-dependent patients. Thirty-one recently detoxified alcohol-dependent patients and 24 healthy controls underwent instrumental training, where approach or non-approach towards initially neutral stimuli was reinforced by monetary incentives. Approach behavior was tested during extinction with either alcohol-related or neutral stimuli (as Pavlovian cues) presented in the background during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Patients were subsequently followed up for 6 months. We observed that alcohol-related background stimuli inhibited the approach behavior in detoxified alcohol-dependent patients (t = − 3.86, p < .001), but not in healthy controls (t = − 0.92, p = .36). This behavioral inhibition was associated with neural activation in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) (t(30) = 2.06, p < .05). Interestingly, both the effects were only present in subsequent abstainers, but not relapsers and in those with mild but not severe dependence. Our data show that alcohol-related cues can acquire inhibitory behavioral features typical of aversive stimuli despite being accompanied by a stronger NAcc activation, suggesting salience attribution. The fact that these findings are restricted to abstinence and milder illness suggests that they may be potential resilience factors.
Clinical trial: LeAD study, http://www.lead-studie.de, NCT01679145.
KeywordsAlcohol dependence Human neuroimaging Nucleus accumbens Pavlovian-instrumental transfer Relapse
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG, FOR 1617: Grants HE 2597/13-1 and 13-2, HE 2597/14-1 and 14-2, HE 2597/15-1 and 15-2, RA 1047/2-1 and 2-2, SCHA 1971/1-2, SCHL 1969/2-1 and 2-2, SM 80/7-1 and 7-2, WI 709/10-1 and 10-2, and ZI 1119/3-1 and 3-2). Eva Friedel is a participant in the BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program funded by the Charité-Universitätsmedizin and the Berlin Institute of Health. Moreover, we thank the LeAD study teams in Berlin and Dresden for all the work and help regarding data collection! We would also like to gratefully thank Carolin Wackerhagen for producing the alcohol- and water-related background stimuli! Finally, we are grateful to Lee Hogarth for discussing the nature of our PIT effects, and for interference account predictions. MR-imaging for this study was performed at the Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (BCAN) and Department of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden.
AB, AH, MAR, MNS, QJMH, USZ were responsible for the study concept and design. CS, DJS, HW, MG, MS, NB, PS and QJMH implemented and piloted the PIT (behavioral and fMRI) paradigm. AH, CH, CS, EF, MG, MS, UE, and USZ recruited alcohol-dependent patients and assessed the follow-up data. HUW and SKP were responsible for the assessment of questionnaires. SN set up a preprocessing pipeline for the imaging data. DJS, EF, FS and MG performed the first- and second-level analyses on fMRI data. DJS and MG performed further statistical analyses with support of AH, MAR and QJMH. AH, DJS, EF, FS, MG and MS drafted the manuscript. CS, HUW, HW, MAR, MNS, NB, PS, QJMH, SKP, SL, SN and USZ provided critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All the authors critically reviewed content and approved the final version for publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 9.Garbusow M, Schad DJ, Sebold M, Friedel E, Bernhardt N, Koch SP, Steinacher B, Kathmann N, Geurts DE, Sommer C, Muller DK, Nebe S, Paul S, Wittchen HU, Zimmermann US, Walter H, Smolka MN, Sterzer P, Rapp MA, Huys QJ, Schlagenhauf F, Heinz A (2016) Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer effects in the nucleus accumbens relate to relapse in alcohol dependence. Addict Biol 21:719–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Heinz A, Siessmeier T, Wrase J, Buchholz HG, Grunder G, Kumakura Y, Cumming P, Schreckenberger M, Smolka MN, Rosch F, Mann K, Bartenstein P (2005) Correlation of alcohol craving with striatal dopamine synthesis capacity and D2/3 receptor availability: a combined [18F]DOPA and [18F]DMFP PET study in detoxified alcoholic patients. Am J Psychiatry 162:1515–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Ostlund SB, Maidment NT, Balleine BW (2010) Alcohol-paired contextual cues produce an immediate and selective loss of goal-directed action in rats. Front Integr Neurosci 4:19Google Scholar
- 28.Jacobi F, Mack S, Gerschler A, Scholl L, Hofler M, Siegert J, Burkner A, Preiss S, Spitzer K, Busch M, Hapke U, Gaebel W, Maier W, Wagner M, Zielasek J, Wittchen HU (2013) The design and methods of the mental health module in the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1-MH). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 22:83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wittchen H-U, Pfister H (1997) DIA-X-Interviews: manual Für Screening-Verfahren Und Interview; Interviewheft Längsschnittuntersuchung (DIA-X-Lifetime); Ergänzungsheft (DIA-X-Lifetime). In: Interviewheft Querschnittuntersuchung (DIA-X-12 Monate); Ergänzungsheft (DIA-X-12 Monate); PC-Programm Zur Durchführung Des Interviews (Längs- Und Querschnittuntersuchung); Auswertungsprogramm. Swets & Zeitlinger, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
- 34.Skinner HA, Horn JL (1984) Alcohol dependence scale (ADS): users guide. Addiction Research Foundation, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 37.Stuppäck C, Barnas C, Falk M, Günther V, Hummer M, Oberbauer H, Pycha R, Whitworth A, Fleischhacker WW (1995) Eine modifizierte und ins deutsche über-setzte Form der Clinical Institut Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale (CIWA-A). Wiener Zeitschrift für Suchtforschung 18:39–48Google Scholar
- 38.Bleich S, Havemann-Reinecke U, Kornhuber J (2002) Der Fagerström-Test für Nikotinabhängigkeit (FTNA). Göttingen, HogrefeGoogle Scholar
- 42.MATLAB version 7.12.0 (2011). The MathWorks Inc, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- 45.R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 46.Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed 15 Dec 2017
- 47.Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RB (2014) lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 82:672Google Scholar
- 48.Welch BL (1947) The generalisation of student’s problems when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34:28–35Google Scholar
- 62.Bühringer G, Wittchen HU, Gottlebe K, Kufeld C, Goschke T (2008) Why people change? The role of cognitive-control processes in the onset and cessation of substance abuse disorders. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 17(Suppl 1):S4-S15Google Scholar
- 66.Heinz A, Siessmeier T, Wrase J, Hermann D, Klein S, Grusser SM, Flor H, Braus DF, Buchholz HG, Grunder G, Schreckenberger M, Smolka MN, Rosch F, Mann K, Bartenstein P (2004) Correlation between dopamine D(2) receptors in the ventral striatum and central processing of alcohol cues and craving. Am J Psychiatry 161:1783–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 67.Boileau I, Payer D, Houle S, Behzadi A, Rusjan PM, Tong J, Wilkins D, Selby P, George TP, Zack M, Furukawa Y, McCluskey T, Wilson AA, Kish SJ (2012) Higher binding of the dopamine D3 receptor-preferring ligand [11C]-(+)-propyl-hexahydro-naphtho-oxazin in methamphetamine polydrug users: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci 32:1353–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar