Advertisement

Evaluation of virtual surgical planning systems and customized devices in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction

  • Jacques BlancEmail author
  • Carine Fuchsmann
  • Veronica Nistiriuc-Muntean
  • Pierre Jacquenot
  • Pierre Philouze
  • Philippe Ceruse
Head and Neck

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of virtual planning using customized surgical devices (VP3D) in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.

Methods

Fourteen patients received VP3D and 16 patients underwent conventional surgery (CS). Virtual planning was compared to postoperative scans using cephalometric and three-dimensional (3D) measurements. Operative times of both VP3D and CS groups were compared.

Results

Comparisons of cephalometric measurements revealed no significant difference between virtual planning and postoperative scans. 3D analysis demonstrated a high level of virtual planning accuracy. In the VP3D group, total operative time gain was 88 min (p < 0.001) and total ischemia time gain was 36 min (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Virtual surgical planning using customized devices enables ‘tailored’ surgery that is accurate and reliable and results in operative and ischemia time gain.

Clinical trial

NCT03869723.

Keywords

Mandibular defect Fibula flap Reconstruction Virtual planning Pre-bent plate 

Notes

Funding

None declared.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Hayden RE, Mullin DP, Patel AK (2012) Reconstruction of the segmental mandibular defect: current state of the art. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 20(4):231–236.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e328355d0f3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chim H, Salgado CJ, Mardini S, Chen H-C (2010) Reconstruction of mandibular defects. Semin Plast Surg 24(2):188–197.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hidalgo DA (1989) Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(1):71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balasundaram I, Al-Hadad I, Parmar S (2012) Recent advances in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(8):695–705.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiapasco M, Colletti G, Romeo E, Zaniboni M, Brusati R (2008) Long-term results of mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts and oral implants after tumor resection. Clin Oral Implants Res 19(10):1074–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01542.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Metzler P, Geiger EJ, Alcon A, Ma X, Steinbacher DM (2014) Three-dimensional virtual surgery accuracy for free fibula mandibular reconstruction: planned versus actual results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(12):2601–2612.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.07.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thankappan K, Trivedi NP, Subash P et al (2008) Three-dimensional computed tomography-based contouring of a free fibula bone graft for mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(10):2185–2192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rose EH, Norris MS, Rosen JM (1993) Application of high-tech three-dimensional imaging and computer-generated models in complex facial reconstructions with vascularized bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 91(2):252–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pellini R, Mercante G, Spriano G (2012) Step-by-step mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap modelling. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32(6):405–409Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang YY, Zhang HQ, Fan S et al (2016) Mandibular reconstruction with the vascularized fibula flap: comparison of virtual planning surgery and conventional surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(11):1400–1405.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schouman T, Bertolus C, Chaine C, Ceccaldi J, Goudot P (2014) Surgery guided by customized devices: reconstruction with a free fibula flap. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillo-Faciale Chir Orale 115(1):28–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revsto.2013.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang L, Liu Z, Li B, Yu H, Shen SG, Wang X (2016) Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized fibular flap compared to conventional surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 121(2):139–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodby KA, Turin S, Jacobs RJ et al (2014) Advances in oncologic head and neck reconstruction: systematic review and future considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided design/computer aided modeling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 67(9):1171–1185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saad A, Winters R, Wise MW, Dupin CL, St Hilaire H (2013) Virtual surgical planning in complex composite maxillofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(3):626–633.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ad299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Antony AK, Chen WF, Kolokythas A, Weimer KA, Cohen MN (2011) Use of virtual surgery and stereolithography-guided osteotomy for mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(5):1080–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ (2013) Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction. The Laryngoscope 123(3):597–604.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Culié D, Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Riss J-C, Fernandez J, Bozec A (2016) Virtual planning and guided surgery in fibular free-flap mandibular reconstruction: A 29-case series. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 133(3):175–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2016.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jewer DD, Boyd JB, Manktelow RT et al (1989) Orofacial and mandibular reconstruction with the iliac crest free flap: a review of 60 cases and a new method of classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(3):391–403 (discussion 404–405)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tarsitano A, Battaglia S, Ricotta F et al (2018) Accuracy of CAD/CAM mandibular reconstruction: a three-dimensional, fully virtual outcome evaluation method. J Cranio-Maxillo-fac Surg 46(7):1121–1125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weitz J, Bauer FJM, Hapfelmeier A, Rohleder NH, Wolff K-D, Kesting MR (2016) Accuracy of mandibular reconstruction by three-dimensional guided vascularised fibular free flap after segmental mandibulectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(5):506–510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.01.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Monaco C, Stranix JT, Avraham T et al (2016) Evolution of surgical techniques for mandibular reconstruction using free fibula flaps: the next generation. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E2066–2073.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seruya M, Fisher M, Rodriguez ED (2013) Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: an outcomes comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1219–1228.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3c0b1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Avraham T, Franco P, Brecht LE et al (2014) Functional outcomes of virtually planned free fibula flap reconstruction of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4):628e–e634.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pauchet D, Pigot J-L, Chabolle F, Bach C-A (2018) Prefabricated fibula free flap with dental implants for mandibular reconstruction. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2018.02.001 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qu X, Wang M, Xu L, Liu J, Bai S, Zhang C (2017) Occlusion guided double-barreled fibular osteoseptocutaneous free flap for refined mandibular reconstruction aided by virtual surgical planning. J Craniofac Surg 28(6):1472–1476.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Silva M, Zambrini EI, Chiari G et al (2016) Pre-surgical assessment of mandibular bone invasion from oral cancer: comparison between different imaging techniques and relevance of radiologist expertise. Radiol Med (Torino) 121(9):704–710.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0654-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krishnamurthy A, Palaniappan R (2018) Osteosarcomas of the head and neck region: a case series with a review of literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 17(1):38–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1017-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zweifel DF, Simon C, Hoarau R, Pasche P, Broome M (2015) Are virtual planning and guided surgery for head and neck reconstruction economically viable? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(1):170–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.07.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Toto JM, Chang EI, Agag R, Devarajan K, Patel SA, Topham NS (2015) Improved operative efficiency of free fibula flap mandible reconstruction with patient-specific, computer-guided preoperative planning. Head Neck 37(11):1660–1664.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Croix Rousse Hospital, Service d’ORL et chirurgie cervico-facialeHospices Civils de Lyon (Hospital Group of Lyon)LyonFrance
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Lyon Sud HospitalHospices Civils de Lyon (Hospital Group of Lyon)Pierre-BéniteFrance
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Croix Rousse HospitalHospices Civils de Lyon (Hospital Group of Lyon)LyonFrance
  4. 4.Claude Bernard UniversityLyon 1France

Personalised recommendations