Flat-based fitting: the evaluation and usefulness of a new strategy-based fitting approach for cochlear implants
- 27 Downloads
The traditional fitting method for cochlear implants (CI), the single-channel fitting (SCF), is effective but time-consuming. A fitting method that is significantly faster to perform, but provides at least equivalent speech understanding and subjective benefit would be of clinical usefulness. The study explored the ability of flat strategy-based fitting (FSBF) maps to fill this need.
Participants were 16 experienced CI users. They were fit with: SCF maps; the maps that the participants used in their everyday lives, called fine-tuned clinical (FTC) maps; and FSBF maps. The fittings were assessed objectively via speech understanding in noise, time needed to create the map, deviation from FTC map, and correlation between auditory response telemetry thresholds and normalized charge levels; and subjectively via spectral balance and hearing quality.
FSBF maps were significantly faster to generate. FTC maps provided the best subjective hearing quality. In all other assessments, no significant differences were found.
FSBF maps can save time and provide CI users with the same level of speech understanding in noise. Participants may have preferred the FTC maps that they were already acclimated to them. These results suggest that the FSBF method could be used in first-fittings or in challenging fitting situations, but subsequent fine-tuning is required in follow-up appointments to improve sound quality.
The FSBF method can be a useful and time-saving alternative fitting method in first-fittings or in challenging fitting situations.
KeywordsCochlear implant Programming Fitting Flat-based map Fine tuning Speech understanding in noise
The authors would like to thank Stefano Morettini (MED-EL) for helping manage the study, Edda Ammann (MED-EL) for performing the statistics, and Michael Todd (MED-EL) for drafting the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The Antwerp University Hospital is currently receiving a grant from MED-EL Medical Electronics. This study was sponsored by MED-EL and supported by HEARRING.
- 2.Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R, Elston J, Weiner G, Taylor RS et al (2009) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 13:1–330. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13440 Google Scholar
- 9.Wagener K, Kühnel V, Kollmeier B (1999) Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache. I: design des Oldenburger Satztests. [Development and design of a sentence test for the German language. I: design of the Oldenburger sentence test] Z Audiol 38:4–15 (German) Google Scholar
- 13.Govaerts PJ, Vaerenberg B, De Ceulaer G, Daemers K, De Beukelaer C, Schauwers K (2010) Development of a software tool using deterministic logic for the optimization of cochlear implant processor programming. Otol Neurotol 31:908–918. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181dd160b CrossRefGoogle Scholar