Peritonsillar abscess is frequently accompanied by sepsis symptoms
- 14 Downloads
To evaluate how many patients with peritonsillar abscess (PTA) fulfill sepsis criteria and if there is any difference in risk factors and treatment results between patients with and without sepsis symptoms. We also aimed to evaluate the utility of several clinical and laboratory markers for diagnosing PTA.
Study group consisted of 92 patients with PTA undergoing bilateral emergency tonsillectomy. Blood samples, pus samples and clinical data were collected. Patients were evaluated for sepsis criteria based on 2001 International Sepsis Definitions Conference.
Sepsis diagnostic criteria were fulfilled in half of patients (51.1%). Smokers (p = 0.016) and patients who had not received antibiotic treatment (p = 0.003) had more sepsis symptoms. Procalcitonin levels were moderate and there was no difference between the groups. In majority of the patients, the pus samples contained undetectable or mild levels of amylase while 12 patients had pus amylase at least twice higher than in blood serum and among them, the levels were remarkably high in 9 patients.
Half of the patients with PTA meet the diagnostic criteria for sepsis. The risk factors for the latter include current smoking and not receiving antibiotic treatment before hospitalization. PTA treatment outcome does not differ between the patients with and without sepsis clinical picture in case of surgical treatment. C-reactive protein appears to be better diagnostic marker for PTA than procalcitonin. A portion of the PTA patients have remarkably high amylase level in the pus indicating possible association with Weber’s salivary glands infection.
KeywordsPeritonsillar abscess Sepsis Amylase Smoking Antibiotic Procalcitonin C-reactive protein
The authors wish to thank Ms. Tiiu Rööp for excellent technical help and Tartu University Hospital Ear Clinic staff for their assistance.
This study was supported by Estonian Research Council (Grant no. IUT34-19), Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (Grant no. KOGU-HUMB) and Enterprise Estonia (Grant no. EU48695).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Passy V (1994) Pathogenesis of peritonsillar abscess. Laryngoscope 104:185–190Google Scholar
- 4.Windfuhr JP (2016) Specified data for tonsil surgery in Germany. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 15:Doc08Google Scholar
- 5.Klug TE (2017) Peritonsillar abscess: clinical aspects of microbiology, risk factors, and the association with parapharyngeal abscess. Dan Med J 64(3):B5333Google Scholar
- 6.Chang BA, Thamboo A, Burton MJ, Diamond C, Nunez DA (2016) Needle aspiration versus incision and drainage for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD006287Google Scholar
- 10.Tekkel M, Veideman T (2017) Eesti täiskasvanud rahvastiku tervisekäitumise uuring, 2016. Health behavior among estonian adult population 2016 (2017). http://rahvatervis.ut.ee/handle/1/6665. Accessed 12 June 2018
- 13.Vaikjärv R et al (2016) Microbiology of peritonsillar abscess in the South Estonian population. Microb Ecol Health Dis 27:27787Google Scholar