Advertisement

Risk factors for intraoperative saddle nose deformity in septoplasty patients

  • Jung Joo Lee
  • Sang Duk Hong
  • Hun-Jong Dhong
  • Seung-Kyu Chung
  • Hyo Yeol KimEmail author
Rhinology
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Septoplasty is one of the most common otolaryngologic procedures. Previous studies have reported that the overall rate of significant change in cosmetic appearance of the nose after septoplasty ranged from 0.4 to 3.4%, and saddle nose was the most commonly cited deformity. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors for intraoperative saddle nose in a group of septoplasty patients.

Methods

This case–control study (1:2 case:control) was conducted based on retrospective chart review. Intraoperative saddle nose was observed in 108 (5.1%) of 2106 patients who underwent septoplasty in our center between January 2008 and December 2017. The control group consisted of 216 randomly selected, hospital-matched septoplasty patients who had no intraoperative saddle nose deformity in the same period. The demographic data, preoperative endoscopic findings, and surgical procedures of the two groups were analyzed to identify possible risk factors of intraoperative saddle nose deformity.

Results

The mean ages of the two groups were 34.8 years (saddle group) and 33.2 years (control group). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, clinical risk factors associated with intraoperative saddle nose were female gender (OR 3.39; 95% CI 1.76–6.54; p < 0.01), severe caudal septal deviation (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.30–3.79; p = 0.003), and intraoperative finding of septal cartilage fracture (OR 3.96; 95% CI 1.92–8.19; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Severe caudal septal deviation, intraoperative fracture of septal cartilage, and female gender were risk factors for intraoperative saddle nose deformity in our study population.

Keywords

Septoplasty Saddle nose Risk factor 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (2017R1A2B4006453).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee at the Samsung Medical Center (IRB number: SMC 2018-05-136).

References

  1. 1.
    Dorning H, Bitzer EM, Hofmann W, Schwartz FW (1995) Longitudinal analysis of utilization of inpatient treatment based on insurance data of mandatory health insurance. Gesundheitswesen 57:631–637Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manoukian PD, Wyatt JR, Leopold DA, Bass EB (1997) Recent trends in utilization of procedures in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 107:472–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laguna D, Lopez-Cortijo C, Millan I, Gonzalez FM, Garcia-Berrocal JR (2008) Blood loss in endoscopic sinus surgery: assessment of variables. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37:324–330Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yanagisawa E, Ho SY (1998) Unintended middle turbinectomy during septoplasty. Ear Nose Throat J 77:368–369Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Onerci TM, Ayhan K, Ogretmenoglu O (2004) Two consecutive cases of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after septoplasty operation. Am J Otolaryngol 25:354–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yeo NK, Jang YJ (2009) Rhinoplasty to correct nasal deformities in postseptoplasty patients. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:540–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ketcham AS, Han JK (2010) Complications and management of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 43:897–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karacaoglan N, Uysal OA (1998) Use of iliac bone graft for saddle nose deformity. Auris Nasus Larynx 25:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gillman GS, Egloff AM, Rivera-Serrano CM (2014) Revision septoplasty: a prospective disease-specific outcome study. Laryngoscope 124:1290–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang JM, Nam ME, Dhong HJ, Kim HY, Chung SK, Kim JH (2012) Modified mattress suturing technique for correcting the septal high dorsal deviation around the keystone area. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kawalski H, Spiewak P (1998) How septum deformations in newborns occur. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 44:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mladina R, Čujić E, Šubarić M, Vuković K (2008) Nasal septal deformities in ear, nose, and throat patients: an international study. Am J Otolaryngol 29:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gubisch W (2005) Extracorporeal septoplasty for the markedly deviated septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muhammad IA, Nabil-ur R (2003) Complications of the surgery for deviated nasal septum. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 13:565–568Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rettinger G, Kirsche H (2006) Complications in septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 22:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bateman ND, Woolford TJ (2003) Informed consent for septal surgery: the evidence-base. J Laryngol Otol 117:186–189Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations