Advertisement

Outcomes in modified transoral resection of diverticula for Zenker’s diverticulum

  • Attapon Junlapan
  • Sara Abu-Ghanem
  • C. Kwang Sung
  • Edward J. DamroseEmail author
Laryngology
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Transoral resection of Zenker’s diverticulum (TORD) was first reported in 2010. We present results for our modified approach to transoral resection (MTORD)—full-thickness cricopharyngeal myectomy, diverticulum sac excision, and suture closure of the pharyngotomy—and evaluate its safety and efficacy compared to endoscopic stapling and open approaches.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent transoral resection of Zenker’s diverticulum using MTORD, endoscopic stapler-assisted diverticulotomy (ESD), or trancervical diverticulectomy (TCD) from July 2009 to August 2017. Pre-operative evaluation included barium swallow and subjective characterization of swallowing dysfunction using the EAT-10 and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). Complications, length of hospitalization, recurrence, and revision rates were also evaluated.

Results

Of 92 patients reviewed, 18 underwent MTORD, 45 underwent ESD and 29 underwent TCD. Major complications were only observed in ESD and TCD. Recurrence which required revision surgery was only observed in ESD. EAT-10 and RSI scores significantly improved and RSI scores normalized post-operatively for all approaches in short-term (< 1 year) follow-up.

Conclusions

MTORD is a safe and effective option for complete Zenker’s diverticulectomy. Complication rates are low. To date, no patient has required reoperation, although more cases and longer term follow-up are needed for more complete comparison to ESD and traditional open excision.

Keywords

Modified transoral resection of diverticulum Endoscopic laser approach Diverticulectomy Zenker’s diverticulum Outcomes Recurrence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Our grateful appreciation is expressed to Yifei Ma, our consulting statistician, for his kind contributions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The consent for participation may be required for the study.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 32564 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Chokhavatia S, Alli-Akintade L, Harpaz N, Stern R (2013) Esophageal pathology: a brief guide and atlas. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 46(6):1043–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Westrin KM, Ergun S, Carlsoo B (1996) Zenker’s diverticulum—a historical review and trends in therapy. Acta Otolaryngol 116(3):351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Acar T, Savas R, Kocacelebi K, Ersoz G (2016) Squamous cell carcinoma arising from a Zenker’s diverticulum: contribution of FDG-PET/CT to the diagnosis. Dis Esophagus 29(8):1170–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mosher HP (1917) Webs and pouches of the oesophagus, their diagnosis and treatment. Surg Gynecol Obstet 25:175–187Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dohlman G, Mattsson O (1960) The endoscopic operation for hypopharyngeal diverticula: a roentgencinematographic study. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 71:744–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Overbeek JJ (1994) Meditation on the pathogenesis of hypopharyngeal (Zenker’s) diverticulum and a report of endoscopic treatment in 545 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103 (3):178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prisman E, Genden EM (2013) Zenker diverticulum. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 46(6):1101–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mortensen M, Schaberg MR, Genden EM, Woo P (2010) Transoral resection of short segment Zenker’s diverticulum and cricopharyngeal myotomy: an alternative minimally invasive approach. Laryngoscope 120(1):17–22Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peretti G, Piazza C, Del Bon F, Cocco D, De Benedetto L, Mangili S (2010) Endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum by carbon dioxide laser. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 30(1):1–4Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murer K, Soyka MB, Broglie MA, Huber GF, Stoeckli SJ (2015) Zenker’s diverticulum: outcome of endoscopic surgery is dependent on the intraoperative exposure. Eur Arch Oto-rhino-laryngol 272(1):167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bloom JD, Bleier BS, Mirza N, Chalian AA, Thaler ER (2010) Factors predicting endoscopic exposure of Zenker’s diverticulum. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119(11):736–741Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson CM, Postma GN (2016) Zenker diverticulum—which surgical approach is superior? JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142 (4):401–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aiolfi A, Scolari F, Saino G, Bonavina L (2015) Current status of minimally invasive endoscopic management for Zenker diverticulum. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7(2):87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Veenker EA, Andersen PE, Cohen JI (2003) Cricopharyngeal spasm and Zenker’s diverticulum. Head Neck 25(8):681–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sasaki CT, Ross DA, Hundal J (2003) Association between Zenker diverticulum and gastroesophageal reflux disease: development of a working hypothesis. Am J Med 115(Suppl 3A):169S–171SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ongkasuwan J, Yung KC, Courey MS (2012) Pharyngeal stasis of secretions in patients with Zenker diverticulum. Otolaryngol head Neck Surg 146(3):426–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adam SI, Paskhover B, Sasaki CT (2013) Revision Zenker diverticulum: laser versus stapler outcomes following initial endoscopic failure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 122(4):247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Verdonck J, Morton RP (2015) Systematic review on treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Eur Arch Oto-rhino-laryngol. 272 (11):3095–3107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yuan Y, Zhao YF, Hu Y, Chen LQ (2013) Surgical treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Digest Surg 30(3):207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Papaspyrou G, Schick B, Papaspyrou S, Wiegand S, Al Kadah B (2016) Laser surgery for Zenker’s diverticulum: European combined study. Eur Arch Oto-rhino-laryngol 273 (1):183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koch M, Mantsopoulos K, Velegrakis S, Iro H, Zenk J (2011) Endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy versus open surgical approach in the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope 121(10):2090–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shahawy S, Janisiewicz AM, Annino D, Shapiro J (2014) A comparative study of outcomes for endoscopic diverticulotomy versus external diverticulectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(4):646–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rizzetto C, Zaninotto G, Costantini M, Bottin R, Finotti E, Zanatta L, Guirroli E, Ceolin M, Nicoletti L, Ruol A, Ancona E (2008) Zenker’s diverticula: feasibility of a tailored approach based on diverticulum size. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2057–2064 (discussion 2064–2055) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chang CW, Burkey BB, Netterville JL, Courey MS, Garrett CG, Bayles SW (2004) Carbon dioxide laser endoscopic diverticulotomy versus open diverticulectomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope 114(3):519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zaninotto G, Narne S, Costantini M, Molena D, Cutrone C, Portale G, Costantino M, Rizzetto C, Basili U, Ancona E (2003) Tailored approach to Zenker’s diverticula. Surg Endosc 17(1):129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Attapon Junlapan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sara Abu-Ghanem
    • 1
  • C. Kwang Sung
    • 1
  • Edward J. Damrose
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of MedicineNaresuan UniversityPhitsanulokThailand

Personalised recommendations