Advertisement

Effects of diode laser setting for laryngeal surgery in a rabbit model

  • Helena Hotz Arroyo-RamosEmail author
  • Larissa Neri
  • Marilia Wellichan Mancini
  • Amaro Nunes Duarte Neto
  • Thais Mauad
  • Rui Imamura
Laryngology

Abstract

Purpose

To study the damaging effect of different diode laser settings on vocal folds 7 days after injury in a rabbit model.

Methods

Twenty-one male New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into three groups with seven animals per group. A 980-nm diode laser was used to create a single spot injury in each vocal fold. Different modulation frequencies (10 Hz versus 1000 Hz) in pulsed mode, different powers (3 W versus 5 W), and distinct wave modes of radiation (pulsed versus continuous) were compared.

Results

The extent of the inflammatory infiltrate and ablation crater were greater when using 5-W optical power compared with 3 W. The extent and depth of the inflammatory infiltrate, and the width and depth of the ablation crater were greater with continuous wave mode compared with pulsed mode. The density of collagen fibers only increased when using the laser in continuous wave mode.

Conclusion

The use of the 980-nm diode laser with an output power of 5 W produced an increased extent of thermal injury compared to an output power of 3 W and, more importantly, using continuous rather than pulsed wave mode significantly increased the extent and depth of thermal injury in rabbit vocal folds.

Keywords

Larynx Vocal fold Laser injury Wound healing Diode laser Endolaryngeal surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for its financial support and Luciana Almeida Lopes for helping to choose the laser settings. We also thank the Research and Education Center for Phototherapy in Health Sciences (NUPEN) for the laser equipment and technical support.

Funding

This study was funded by FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de São Paulo—Grant number 2015/25095-0).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for the Analysis of Research Projects of the University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine (research protocol no. 177/13). All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. 1.
    Saetti R, Silvestrini M, Cutrone C, Narne S (2008) Treatment of congenital subglottic hemangiomas: our experience compared with reports in the literature. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:848–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferri E, Armato E (2008) Diode laser microsurgery for treatment of Tis and T1 glottic carcinomas. Am J Otolaryngol 29:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saetti R, Silvestrini M, Galiotto M, Derosas F, Narne S (2003) Contact laser surgery in treatment of vocal fold paralysis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 23:33–37Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bajaj Y, Pegg D, Gunasekaran S, Knight LC (2010) Diode laser for paediatric airway procedures: a useful tool. Int J Clin Pract 64:51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fanjul M, García-Casillas MA, Parente A, Cañizo A, Laín A, Matute JA et al (2008) Diode laser application for the treatment of pediatric airway pathologies. Cir Pediatr 2008:79–83Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferri E, García Purriños FJ (2006) Diode laser surgery in the endoscopic treatment of laryngeal paralysis. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 57:270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edizer DT, Cansız H (2013) Transoral laser microsurgery for glottic cancers—complications and importance of the anterior commissure involvement. Istanb Med J 14:12–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu S-C, Lin D-S, Su W-F (2013) The role of diode laser in the treatment of ventricular dysphonia. J Voice 27:250–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tunçel U, Cömert E (2013) Preliminary results of diode laser surgery for early glottic cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karasu MF, Gundogdu R, Cagli S, Aydin M, Arli T, Aydemir S et al (2014) Comparison of effects on voice of diode laser and cold knife microlaryngology techniques for vocal fold polyps. J Voice 28:387–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cömert E, Tunçel Ü, Dizman A, Güney YY (2014) Comparison of early oncological results of diode laser surgery with radiotherapy for early glottic carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150:818–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karkos PD, Stavrakas M, Markou K (2016) Early glottic cancer and difficult laryngoscopy: flexible endoscopic diode laryngeal laser-assisted surgery—a pilot study of an oncologically safe tool. Clin Otolaryngol 41:830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pedregal-Mallo D, Sánchez Canteli M, López F, Álvarez-Marcos C, Llorente JL, Rodrigo JP (2018) Oncological and functional outcomes of transoral laser surgery for laryngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275:2071–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arroyo HH, Neri L, Fussuma CY, Imamura R (2016) Diode laser for laryngeal surgery: a systematic review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 20:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mau T, Du M, Xu CC (2014) A rabbit vocal fold laser scarring model for testing lamina propria tissue-engineering therapies. Laryngoscope 124:2321–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Divi V, Benninger M, Kiupel M, Dobbie A (2012) Coblation of the canine vocal fold: a histologic study. J Voice 26:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitchell JR, Kojima T, Wu H, Garrett CG, Rousseau B (2014) Biochemical basis of vocal fold mobilization after microflap surgery in a rabbit model. Laryngoscope 124:487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benninger MS, Alessi D, Archer S, Bastian R, Ford C, Koufman J et al (1996) Vocal fold scarring: current concepts and management. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 15:474–482Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Woo P, Casper J, Colton R, Brewer D (1994) Diagnosis and treatment of persistent dysphonia after laryngeal surgery: a retrospective analysis of 62 patients. Laryngoscope 104:1084–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mortensen MM, Woo P, Ivey C, Thompson C, Carroll L, Altman K (2008) The use of the pulse dye laser in the treatment of vocal fold scar: a preliminary study. Laryngoscope 118:1884–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Newman J, Anand V (2002) Applications of the diode laser in otolaryngology. Ear Nose Throat J 81:850–851Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D’Arcangelo C, Di Maio FDN, Prosperi GD, Conte E, Baldi M, Caputi S (2007) A preliminary study of healing of diode laser versus scalpel incisions in rat oral tissue: a comparison of clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:764–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bryant GL, Davidson JM, Ossoff RH, Garrett CG, Reinisch L (1998) Histologic study of oral mucosa wound healing: a comparison of a 6.0- to 6.8-micrometer pulsed laser and a carbon dioxide laser. Laryngoscope 108:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang Y, Cao L, Chen Q, Chen X, Xu W, Fang Q et al (2011) Experimental study on different power CO2 laser for vocal cord injury. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 46:1039–1041Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benninger MS (2000) Microdissection or microspot CO2 laser for limited vocal fold benign lesions: a prospective randomized trial. Laryngoscope 11:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 220:524–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dhar P, Malik A (2011) Anesthesia for laser surgery in ENT and the various ventilatory techniques. Trends Anaesth Crit Care 1:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garrett CG, Reinisch L (2002) New-generation pulsed carbon dioxide laser: comparative effects on vocal fold wound healing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fortune DS, Huang S, Soto J, Pennington B, Ossoff RH, Reinisch L (1998) Effect of pulse duration on wound healing using a CO2 laser. Laryngoscope 108:843–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Friedrich G, Dikkers FG, Arens C, Remacle M, Hess M, Giovanni A et al (2013) Vocal fold scars: current concepts and future directions. Consensus report of the Phonosurgery Committee of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:2491–2507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hendriksma M, Montagne MW, Langeveld TPM, Veselic M, van Benthem PPG, Sjögren EV (2018) Evaluation of surgical margin status in patients with early glottic cancer (Tis-T2) treated with transoral CO2 laser microsurgery, on local control. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275:2333–2340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gray SD, Titze IR, Alipour F, Hammond TH (2000) Biomechanical and histologic observations of vocal fold fibrous proteins. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thibeault SL, Gray SD, Bless DM, Chan RW, Ford CN (2002) Histologic and rheologic characterization of vocal fold scarring. J Voice 16:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tateya T, Tateya I, Sohn JH, Bless DM (2006) Histological study of acute vocal fold injury in a rat model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Branski RC, Rosen CA, Verdolini K, Hebda PA (2005) Acute vocal fold wound healing in a rabbit model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ling C, Yamashita M, Waselchuk EA, Raasch JL, Bless DM, Welham NV (2010) Alteration in cellular morphology, density and distribution in rat vocal fold mucosa following injury. Wound Repair Regen 18:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yamashita M, Bless DM, Welham NV (2009) Surgical method to create vocal fold injuries in mice. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Campagnolo AM, Tsuji DH, Sennes LU, Imamura R, Saldiva PH (2010) Histologic study of acute vocal fold wound healing after corticosteroid injection in a rabbit model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyThe University of Sao Paulo School of MedicineSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Research and Education Center for Phototherapy in Health Sciences (NUPEN)São CarlosBrazil
  3. 3.Department of PathologyThe University of Sao Paulo School of MedicineSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations