Advertisement

An original procedure for orbitonasal cutaneous infiltrative tumor repair, using combined forehead and melolabial propeller flaps

  • Clair Vandersteen
  • Dorian Culié
  • Olivier Dassonville
  • Alexandre Bozec
  • Nicolas Guevara
  • Charles Savoldelli
  • Gilles Poissonnet
Head & Neck
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Resections of cutaneous tumors in the medial orbitonasal region can be transfixing. Repairs using a single local flap run the risk of failure and that of secondary sinonasal fistula, especially in cases of surgery on a radiated field. We propose an original and reliable repair procedure using two pedicled regional flaps vascularized by two distinct arterial systems clinched together to reconstruct the mucosal and cutaneous planes.

Materials and methods

A first melolabial propeller flap (MPF) with a superior perforating pedicle was elevated and the cutaneous side was sutured to the deep plane of the loss of substance (mucosal lining). A second homolateral or contralateral paramedian forehead flap (PFF) was then lifted and sutured over the first flap (superficial plane). The forehead pedicle flap was divided at 1 month.

Results

No trophic complication or failure was recorded on two patients. The 7-year carcinologic, aesthetic, and functional results were satisfying.

Conclusion

This technique involving the superimposition of two local flaps, vascularized by two different arterial systems, appears to offer a simple and reliable repair technique for transfixing cutaneous losses of substance in the medial orbitonasal region. It could be used in the first-line treatment, particularly if an additional radiotherapy is to be performed.

Keywords

Nasocutaneous fistula Medial canthus Paramedian forehead flap Melolabial propeller flap 

Notes

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Limawararut V, Leibovitch I, Davis G et al (2007) Sino-orbital fistula: a complication of exenteration. Ophthalmology 114:355–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mehta V, Alon EE, Buchbinder D, Urken ML (2010) Novel use of unilateral galeopericranial flaps for closure of sino-orbital cutaneous fistulas. Laryngoscope.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21630 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olivier Camuzard MD, Rémi Foissac MD, Charalambos Georgiou MD et al (2015) Facial artery perforator flap for reconstruction of perinasal defects: an anatomical study and clinical application. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:2057–2065.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Védrine PO, Meghachi A, Jankowski R, Simon C (2015) Chirurgie des tumeurs sinusiennes. EMC - Chirurgie 2:694–708.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcchi.2005.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mangold U, Lierse W, Pfeifer G (1980) The arteries of the forehead as the basis of nasal reconstruction with forehead flaps. Acta Anat (Basel) 107:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shipkov C, Simov R, Bukov Y et al (2003) Le lambeau nasogénien et le lambeau du buccinateur. Étude anatomique et à propos de 2 cas cliniques. Ann Chir Plast Esthétique 48:152–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0294-1260(03)00038-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruiz-Moya A, Lagares-Borrego A, Infante-Cossío P (2015) Propeller facial artery perforator flap as first reconstructive option for nasolabial and perinasal complex defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 68:457–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brüe E, Bey E, CARIOU JL (2000) L’artère faciale. Rappel embryologique, anatomie descriptive et fonctionnelle d’après une revue de la littérature. Ann Chir Plast esthétique 45:461–484Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gardetto A, Moriggl B, Maurer H et al (2002) Anatomical basis for a new island axial pattern flap in the perioral region. Surg Radiol Anat 24:147–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-002-0050-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bondaz M, Ricard A-S, Majoufre-Lefebvre C et al (2014) Facial vein variation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2:e183.  https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000134 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kakinuma H, Iwasawa U, Honjoh M (2002) A composite nasolabial flap for an entire ala reconstruction. Dermatologic Surg 28:237–240.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01214.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazaridis N (2003) Unilateral subcutaneous pedicled nasolabial island flap for anterior mouth floor reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:182–190.  https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spear SL, Kroll SS, Romm S (1987) A new twist to the nasolabial flap for reconstruction of lateral alar defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:915–920CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Talmant JC (2008) Reconstruction du nez. Reconstructions partielles et totale. EMC - Tech Chir - Chir Plast Reconstr esthétique 3:1–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1286-9325(08)45510-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Menick FJ (2009) Nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap. Clin Plast Surg 36:443–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2009.02.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moyer JS (2010) Reconstruction of extensive nasal defects with staged bilateral paramedian forehead flaps. Ann Plast Surg 65:188–192.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c71429 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brodland DG (2005) Paramedian forehead flap reconstruction for nasal defects. Am Soc Dermatol Surg 31:1046–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kleintjes WG (2007) Forehead anatomy: arterial variations and venous link of the midline forehead flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 60:593–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Menick FJ (2002) A 10-year experience in nasal reconstruction with the three-stage forehead flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1839–1855; (discussion 1856–1861)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh DJ, Bartlett SP (2003) Aesthetic considerations in nasal reconstruction and the role of modified nasal subunits. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:639–648.(discussion 649–651)  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000041602.85239.93 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yeatts RP, Newsom RW, Matthews BL (1996) Doppler-assisted vascular pedicle flaps in eyelid and periorbital reconstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 114:1149–1152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reece EM, Schaverien M, Rohrich RJ (2008) The paramedian forehead flap: a dynamic anatomical vascular study verifying safety and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1956–1963.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181707109 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Angobaldo J, Marks M (2009) Refinements in nasal reconstruction: the cross-paramedian forehead flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:87–93.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181954036 (discussion 94–97).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belmar P, Eusebio E, De Sánchez C et al (2011) Paramedian forehead flap for the reconstruction of extensive nasal defects. Actas Dermosifiliogr 102:187–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mehta V, Alon EE, Buchbinder D, Urken ML (2011) Novel use of unilateral galeopericranial flaps for closure of sino-orbital cutaneous fistulas. Laryngoscope 121:777–781.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21434 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leatherbarrow B, Watson A, Wilcsek G Use of the pericranial flap in medial canthal reconstruction: another application for this versatile flap. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 22:414–419.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iop.0000243606.14193.34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Price DL, Sherris D, Bartley GB, Garrity J (2014) Forehead flap periorbital reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6:222–227.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.6.4.222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lai A, Cheney ML (2014) Temporoparietal fascial flap in orbital reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2:196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Putterman AM (1989) Reconstruction of nasal fistulas of the medial canthus. Am J Ophthalmol 108:68–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Funk GF, Laurenzo JF, Valentino J et al (1995) Free-tissue transfer reconstruction of midfacial and cranio-orbito-facial defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:293–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Universitaire de la Face et du CouCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NICENiceFrance
  2. 2.Institut Universitaire de la Face et du CouCentre Antoine LacassagneNiceFrance

Personalised recommendations