European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 275, Issue 10, pp 2529–2533 | Cite as

Rigid dilatation of pediatric laryngotracheal stenosis as an adequate alternative to balloon dilatation

  • Daniel YafitEmail author
  • Oren Cavel
  • Omer J. Ungar
  • Oshri Wasserzug
  • Yael Oestreicher-Kedem
  • Anna Shklovsky-Kordi
  • Ari DeRowe



Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the mainstay of endoscopic therapy for laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS), although there is no evidence that it achieves better results than traditional rigid laryngeal dilators. Rigid bougie dilators are less expensive and easier to use, and confer the advantage of providing tactile information about the stenosis to the surgeon. We analyzed the outcome of endoscopic rigid bougie dilatation of LTS in a large series of children and compared it to the reported results of EBD in the same setting.

Patients and methods

All cases of pediatric LTS treated by endoscopic rigid dilatation in a tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. They were divided into a primary dilatation group (PDG) and a post-reconstruction dilatation group (PRG). The PDG children had no history of reconstructive airway surgery, and dilatation was the major treatment approach. The PRG children underwent dilatations after airway reconstruction surgery as part of routine postoperative management. A successful primary outcome was defined as improvement of dyspnea and achievement of a functional airway without reconstructive laryngotracheal surgery or need for a tracheostomy at final follow-up.


Sixty-two children (68 cases, mean age 5.1 years, range 0.7–17.2) underwent 156 endoscopic rigid dilatations. Successful outcome was achieved in 48 cases (70.6%), 73.0% in the PDG and 67.7% in the PRG. There were no procedure-related adverse events.


Endoscopic rigid dilatation is a relatively inexpensive and efficacious tool in endoscopic management of pediatric LTS. Its success rates are in the same range as those of EBD.


Laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) Subglottic stenosis Dilatation Pediatric airway surgery Endoscopic 



Esther Eshkol is thanked for editorial assistance.


None. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.


  1. 1.
    Avelino M, Maunsell R, Jube Wastowski I (2015) Predicting outcomes of balloon laryngoplasty in children with subglottic stenosis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79(4):532–536. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Durden F, Sobol SE (2007) Balloon laryngoplasty as a primary treatment for subglottic stenosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(8):772–775. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guarisco JL, Yang CJ (2013) Balloon dilation in the management of severe airway stenosis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Surg 48(8):1676–1681. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hautefort C, Teissier N, Viala P, Van Den Abbeele T (2012) Balloon dilation laryngoplasty for subglottic stenosis in children: eight years’ experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(3):235–240. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maresh A, Preciado DA, O’Connell AP, Zalzal GH (2014) A comparative analysis of open surgery vs endoscopic balloon dilation for pediatric subglottic stenosis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(10):901–905. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ortiz R, Dominguez E, De La Torre C, Hernandez F, Encinas JL, Lopez-Fernandez S, Castro L, Menendez JJ, De la Serna O, Vazquez J, Santamaria ML, Tovar JA (2014) Early endoscopic dilation and mitomycin application in the treatment of acquired tracheal stenosis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 24(1):39–45. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wentzel JL, Ahmad SM, Discolo CM, Gillespie MB, Dobbie AM, White DR (2014) Balloon laryngoplasty for pediatric laryngeal stenosis: case series and systematic review. Laryngoscope 124(7):1707–1712. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whigham AS, Howell R, Choi S, Pena M, Zalzal G, Preciado D (2012) Outcomes of balloon dilation in pediatric subglottic stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121(7):442–448. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bakthavachalam S, McClay JE (2008) Endoscopic management of subglottic stenosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(4):551–559. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maksoud-Filho JG, Goncalves ME, Cardoso SR, Tannuri U (2008) Early diagnostic and endoscopic dilatation for the treatment of acquired upper airway stenosis after intubation in children. J Pediatr Surg 43(7):1254–1258. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pashley NR (1983) Serial dilation compared to elective laryngo-tracheoplasty in the treatment of acquired subglottic stenosis in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 5(1):59–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myer CM 3rd, O’Connor DM, Cotton RT (1994) Proposed grading system for subglottic stenosis based on endotracheal tube sizes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103(4 Pt 1):319–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hseu AF, Benninger MS, Haffey TM, Lorenz R (2014) Subglottic stenosis: a ten-year review of treatment outcomes. Laryngoscope 124(3):736–741. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown SB, Hedlund GL, Glasier CM, Williams KD, Greenwood LH, Gilliland JD (1987) Tracheobronchial stenosis in infants: successful balloon dilation therapy. Radiology 164(2):475–478. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hebra A, Powell DD, Smith CD, Othersen HB Jr (1991) Balloon tracheoplasty in children: results of a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 26(8):957–961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Modi VK, Visaya JM, Ward RF (2015) Histopathological effect of balloon dilation in a live rabbit: implications for the pediatric airway. Laryngoscope 125 (Suppl 6):S1–S11. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Messineo A, Forte V, Joseph T, Silver MM, Filler RM (1992) The balloon posterior tracheal split: a technique for managing tracheal stenosis in the premature infant. J Pediatr Surg 27(8):1142–1144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations