Olfactory cleft evaluation: a predictor for olfactory function in smell-impaired patients?
In this study, we introduce an extension of previous work by Soler et al. (Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6(3):293–298, 2016) on a modified endoscopic scoring system of the Lund–Kennedy Score (focusing on the olfactory cleft) to evaluate its correlation with the olfactory function in patients with various smell disorders.
A prospective cohort study.
Two-hundred and eighty-eight participants were included and categorized in five groups according to the cause of their olfactory disorder: (0) control, (1) idiopathic, (2) sino-nasal, (3) postinfectious and (4) post traumatic olfactory loss. Olfaction was evaluated using the “Sniffin’ Sticks” test. The classical Lund–Kennedy scoring and a new olfactory cleft specific Lund–Kennedy scoring (OC–LK) were performed to evaluate mucosal changes.
Significantly higher OC–LK scores on both sides were found in smell-impaired patients as compared to normosmic controls. When comparing the 4 groups, a significant difference of the OC–LK score were present between the sino-nasal and all other groups. Most importantly, significant negative correlations with strong effects were shown in the sino-nasal group between the OC–LK score and odor discrimination and odor identification. However, no such correlation emerged between the classical LK score and smell function.
Olfactory cleft evaluation using the OC–LK score correlates with the olfactory function in patients with sino-nasal smell disorder. This diagnostic tool may reflect the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of sino-nasal smell loss, and therefore, should complement olfactory diagnostics in patients with sino-nasal smell disorder.
KeywordsLund–Kennedy scoring system Sino-nasal Olfactory loss Olfactory cleft Endoscopic grading
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
TH, GM, AH, SCP declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 5.Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J et al (2012) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. Rhinol Suppl (23):3 p preceding table of contents, 1–298. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22764607
- 6.Lane AP, Turner J, May L, Reed R (2010) A genetic model of chronic rhinosinusitis-associated olfactory inflammation reveals reversible functional impairment and dramatic neuroepithelial reorganization. J Neurosci 30(6):2324–2329. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4507-09.2010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lund VJ, Mackay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 31(4):183–184. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8140385
- 14.Senior BA, Kennedy DW, Tanabodee J, Kroger H, Hassab M, Lanza D (1998) Long-term results of functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 108(2):151–157. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9473061
- 20.Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2007) Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Oto Rhino Laryngol 264(3):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G (1997) “Sniffin” sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22(1):39–52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9056084
- 22.Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M et al (2000) Multicenter investigation of 1036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257(4):205–211. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10867835