Current usage of qualitative research in female pelvic pain: a systematic review
- 18 Downloads
Qualitative research has received growing attention in the multidisciplinary investigation of patients' perceptions about chronic diseases. The purpose of this systematic review was to characterize the usage of qualitative research in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).
We performed a structured search in Web of Science, Pubmed, and EMBASE platforms until June 2019. The search combined the keywords: "pelvic pain", "endometriosis", "dyspareunia", "dysmenorrhea", "vaginismus", "focus groups", "qualitative research", "hermeneutics", "grounded theory", and "women". Qualitative studies on female CPP were included and the main findings combined using thematic synthesis.
We found 1211 citations, of which 52 were included in this review. The majority of included studies were based on phenomenological design. The main method for data collection was semi-structured interviews. Endometriosis was the theme of 23 studies, chronic pelvic pain of eight, dysmenorrhea of eight, dyspareunia of four, interstitial cystitis of two, vaginismus of two, vulvodynia of two, and pelvic inflammatory disease of one study. We found a wide variety of contributions. Among them, the impact of the disease on women's lives was the commonest.
Qualitative research has the potential to reveal and explain several aspects of CPP in women. The medical community may better accept knowledge gained from these studies if the methods are described more transparently in published articles.
KeywordsPelvic pain Qualitative research Interviews Endometriosis
BHM protocol development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript editing. TLP protocol development and data collection. OBPN, JCRS, and AAN manuscript editing. FJCR protocol development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing.
FJCR (Grant No. 304424/2015-3) was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). BHM (Grant No. 23038.000832/2018-31) was funded by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the contents of this article.
- 2.Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ (2000) The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 95:199–205Google Scholar
- 3.da Silva GPOG, Nascimento AL, Michelazzo D et al (2011) High prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil and direct association with abdominal surgery. Clin Sao Paulo Braz 66:1307–1312Google Scholar
- 13.McLafferty E, Farley AH (2006) Analysing qualitative research data using computer software. Nurs Times 102:34–36Google Scholar
- 14.Banner DJ, Albarrran JW (2009) Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software: a review. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs J Can En Soins Infirm Cardio-Vasc 19:24–31Google Scholar
- 31.Armour M, Dahlen HG, Smith CA (2016) More Than Needles: The Importance of Explanations and Self-Care Advice in Treating Primary Dysmenorrhea with Acupuncture. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3467067
- 42.Sánchez Bravo C, Carreño Meléndez J, Corres Ayala NP, Taracena Ruiz BE (2010) Profiles and psychological indicators related to dyspareunia and vaginismus: qualitative study. Part two perfiles e indicadores psicológicos relacionados con la dispareunia y el vaginismo: Estudio cualitativo. Segunda parte. Salud Ment 33:437–449Google Scholar
- 54.Whitney M (1998) Importance of lay organizations for coping with endometriosis. J Reprod Med 43:331–334Google Scholar
- 73.Buchan A, Munday P, Ravenhill G et al (2007) A qualitative study of women with vulvodynia I. The journey into treatment. J Reprod Med 52:15–18Google Scholar