Advertisement

Current usage of qualitative research in female pelvic pain: a systematic review

  • Bruna Helena Mellado
  • Taynara Louisi Pilger
  • Omero Benedicto Poli-Neto
  • Julio Cesar Rosa e Silva
  • Antonio Alberto Nogueira
  • Francisco José Candido dos ReisEmail author
Review
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Qualitative research has received growing attention in the multidisciplinary investigation of patients' perceptions about chronic diseases. The purpose of this systematic review was to characterize the usage of qualitative research in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

Methods

We performed a structured search in Web of Science, Pubmed, and EMBASE platforms until June 2019. The search combined the keywords: "pelvic pain", "endometriosis", "dyspareunia", "dysmenorrhea", "vaginismus", "focus groups", "qualitative research", "hermeneutics", "grounded theory", and "women". Qualitative studies on female CPP were included and the main findings combined using thematic synthesis.

Results

We found 1211 citations, of which 52 were included in this review. The majority of included studies were based on phenomenological design. The main method for data collection was semi-structured interviews. Endometriosis was the theme of 23 studies, chronic pelvic pain of eight, dysmenorrhea of eight, dyspareunia of four, interstitial cystitis of two, vaginismus of two, vulvodynia of two, and pelvic inflammatory disease of one study. We found a wide variety of contributions. Among them, the impact of the disease on women's lives was the commonest.

Conclusion

Qualitative research has the potential to reveal and explain several aspects of CPP in women. The medical community may better accept knowledge gained from these studies if the methods are described more transparently in published articles.

Keywords

Pelvic pain Qualitative research Interviews Endometriosis 

Notes

Author contributions

BHM protocol development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript editing. TLP protocol development and data collection. OBPN, JCRS, and AAN manuscript editing. FJCR protocol development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing.

Funding

FJCR (Grant No. 304424/2015-3) was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). BHM (Grant No. 23038.000832/2018-31) was funded by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the contents of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Howard FM (1993) The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: promise and pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol Surv 48:357–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ (2000) The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 95:199–205Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    da Silva GPOG, Nascimento AL, Michelazzo D et al (2011) High prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil and direct association with abdominal surgery. Clin Sao Paulo Braz 66:1307–1312Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF et al (1996) Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 87:321–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00458-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gelbaya TA, El-Halwagy HE (2001) Focus on primary care: chronic pelvic pain in women. Obstet Gynecol Surv 56:757–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flor H, Fydrich T, Turk DC (1992) Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review. Pain 49:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitchell LA, MacDonald RAR (2009) Qualitative research on pain. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 3:131–135.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0b013e32832b7de2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ et al (2014) Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 89:1245–1251.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19:349–357.  https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thomas J, Harden A (2008) Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 8:45.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carel H (2011) Phenomenology and its application in medicine. Theor Med Bioeth 32:33–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-010-9161-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Britten N (1995) Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 311:251–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McLafferty E, Farley AH (2006) Analysing qualitative research data using computer software. Nurs Times 102:34–36Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Banner DJ, Albarrran JW (2009) Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software: a review. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs J Can En Soins Infirm Cardio-Vasc 19:24–31Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    St John W, Johnson P (2000) The pros and cons of data analysis software for qualitative research. J Nurs Scholarsh 32:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guest G, MacQueen K, Namey E (2012) Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Howard F (2000) The role of laparoscopy as a diagnostic tool in chronic pelvic pain. BEST Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 14:467–494.  https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.1999.0086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laganà AS, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AMC et al (2017) Anxiety and depression in patients with endometriosis: impact and management challenges. Int J Womens Health 9:323–330.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S119729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AMC, Laganà AS (2017) Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and psychological well-being. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 38:317–319.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1244185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Vitagliano A et al (2017) Sexual function and quality of life in patients affected by deep infiltrating endometriosis: current evidence and future perspectives. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord 9:270–274.  https://doi.org/10.5301/jeppd.5000303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patnaik SS, Laganà AS, Vitale SG et al (2017) Etiology, pathophysiology and biomarkers of interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:1341–1359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4364-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cervigni M, Natale F (2014) Gynecological disorders in bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis patients. Int J Urol 21(Suppl 1):85–88.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fougner M, Haugstad GK (2015) Treating gynecological pain: the experiences of bachelor students in physiotherapy performing somatocognitive therapy. Physiother Theory Pract 31:318–326.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2014.1003343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McGowan L, Escott D, Luker K et al (2010) Is chronic pelvic pain a comfortable diagnosis for primary care practitioners: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 11:7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Selfe S, Van Vugt M, Stones R (1998) Chronic gynaecological pain: an exploration of medical attitudes. Pain 77:215–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00104-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Souza PP, Romão APMS, Nakano AMS et al (2012) Biomedical perspectives about women with chronic pelvic pain: a qualitative analysis. Int J Clin Med 03:411.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2012.35077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grace VM (1997) MacBride-Stewart S (2007) “Women get this”: gendered meanings of chronic pelvic pain. Health Lond Engl 11:47–67.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459307070803 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Price J, Farmer G, Harris J et al (2006) Attitudes of women with chronic pelvic pain to the gynaecological consultation: a qualitative study. BJOG- Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113:446–452.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00862.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McGowan L, Luker K, Creed F, Chew-Graham CA (2007) How do you explain a pain that can’t be seen? The narratives of women with chronic pelvic pain and their disengagement with the diagnostic cycle. Br J Health Psychol 12:261–274.  https://doi.org/10.1348/135910706X104076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Warwick R, Joseph S, Cordle C, Ashworth P (2004) Social support for women with chronic pelvic pain: what is helpful from whom? Psychol Health 19:117–134.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440310001613482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Armour M, Dahlen HG, Smith CA (2016) More Than Needles: The Importance of Explanations and Self-Care Advice in Treating Primary Dysmenorrhea with Acupuncture. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3467067
  32. 32.
    Aziato L, Dedey F, Clegg-Lamptey JNA (2015) Dysmenorrhea management and coping among students in ghana: a qualitative exploration. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 28:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Burbeck R, Willig C (2014) The personal experience of dysmenorrhoea: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Health Psychol 19:1334–1344.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313490313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Byles JE, Hanrahan PF, Schofield MJ (1997) “It would be good to know you’re not alone”: the health care needs of women with menstrual symptoms. Fam Pract 14:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chen CX, Shieh C, Draucker CB, Carpenter JS (2018) Reasons women do not seek health care for dysmenorrhea. J Clin Nurs 27:e301–e308.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen CX, Draucker CB, Carpenter JS (2018) What women say about their dysmenorrhea: A qualitative thematic analysis. BMC Womens Health 18:47.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0538-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nguyen AM, Humphrey L, Kitchen H et al (2015) A qualitative study to develop a patient-reported outcome for dysmenorrhea. Qual Life Res 24:181–191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0755-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wong CL, Ip WY, Lam LW (2016) Self-care strategies among chinese adolescent girls with dysmenorrhea: a qualitative study. PAIN Manag Nurs 17:262–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2016.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Denny E, Mann CH (2007) Endometriosis-associated dyspareunia: the impact on women’s lives. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 33:189–193.  https://doi.org/10.1783/147118907781004831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Donaldson RL, Meana M (2011) Early dyspareunia experience in young women: confusion, consequences, and help-seeking barriers. J Sex Med 8:814–823.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02150.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Elmerstig E, Wijma B, Berterö C (2008) Why do young women continue to have sexual intercourse despite pain? J Adolesc Health 43:357–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sánchez Bravo C, Carreño Meléndez J, Corres Ayala NP, Taracena Ruiz BE (2010) Profiles and psychological indicators related to dyspareunia and vaginismus: qualitative study. Part two perfiles e indicadores psicológicos relacionados con la dispareunia y el vaginismo: Estudio cualitativo. Segunda parte. Salud Ment 33:437–449Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Denny E (2009) “I never know from one day to another how i will feel”: pain and uncertainty in women with endometriosis. Qual Health Res 19:985–995.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309338725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fauconnier A, Staraci S, Huchon C et al (2013) Comparison of patient- and physician-based descriptions of symptoms of endometriosis: a qualitative study. Hum Reprod 28:2686–2694.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gilmour JA, Huntington A, Wilson HV (2008) The impact of endometriosis on work and social participation. Int J Nurs Pract 14:443–448.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00718.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S (2004) The impact of endometriosis upon quality of life: a qualitative analysis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 25:123–133.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820400002279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Manderson L, Warren N, Markovic M (2008) Circuit breaking: pathways of treatment seeking for women with endometriosis in Australia. Qual Health Res 18:522–534.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308315432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mellado BH, Falcone ACM, Poli-Neto OB et al (2016) Social isolation in women with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Int J Gynecol Obstet 133:199–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Moradi M, Parker M, Sneddon A et al (2014) Impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health 14:123.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hallstam A, Stalnacke BM, Svensen C, Lofgren M (2018) Living with painful endometriosis - A struggle for coherence: a qualitative study. Sex Reprod Healthc 17:97–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Markovic M, Manderson L, Warren N (2008) Endurance and contest: women’s narratives of endometriosis. Health (NY) 12:349–367.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459308090053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Roomaney R, Kagee A (2016) Coping strategies employed by women with endometriosis in a public health-care setting. J Health Psychol 21:2259–2268.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315573447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Roomaney R, Kagee A (2018) Salient aspects of quality of life among women diagnosed with endometriosis: a qualitative study. J Health Psychol 23:905–916.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316643069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Whitney M (1998) Importance of lay organizations for coping with endometriosis. J Reprod Med 43:331–334Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Conboy L, Quilty MT, Kerr C et al (2008) A qualitative analysis of adolescents’ experiences of active and sham Japanese-style acupuncture protocols administered in a clinical trial. J Altern Complement Med 14:699–705.  https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2007.0718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Denny E (2004) Women’s experience of endometriosis. J Adv Nurs 46:641–648.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03055.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J (2006) What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 86:1296–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ferntnstert.2006.04.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bullo S (2018) Exploring disempowerment in women’s accounts of endometriosis experiences. Discourse Commun 12:569–586.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318771430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cox H, Henderson L, Andersen N et al (2003) Focus group study of endometriosis: struggle, loss and the medical merry-go-round. Int J Nurs Pract 9:2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Denny E, Mann CH (2008) Endometriosis and the primary care consultation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139:111–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Huntington A, Gilmour JA (2005) A life shaped by pain: women and endometriosis. J Clin Nurs 14:1124–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01231.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Seear K (1982) (2009) The etiquette of endometriosis: stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay. Soc Sci Med 69:1220–1227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Butt FS, Chesla C (2007) Relational patterns of couples living with chronic pelvic pain from endometriosis. Qual Health Res 17:571–585.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307299907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Emad MC (2006) At WITSENDO: Communal embodiment through storytelling in women’s experiences with endometriosis. Womens Stud Int Forum 29:197–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2006.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Whelan E (2007) “No one agrees except for those of us who have it”: endometriosis patients as an epistemological community. Sociol Health Illn 29:957–982.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01024.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Azevedo K, Nguyen A, Rowhani-Rahbar A et al (2005) Pain impacts sexual functioning among interstitial cystitis patients. Sex Disabil 23:189–208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-005-8927-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sutcliffe S, Bradley CS, Clemens JQ et al (2015) Urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome flares and their impact: qualitative analysis in the MAPP network. Int Urogynecol J 26:1047–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2652-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Newton D, Bayly C, Fairley CK et al (2014) Women’s experiences of pelvic inflammatory disease: implications for health-care professionals. J Health Psychol 19:618–628.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313476973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Macey K, Gregory A, Nunns D, Nair R (2015) Women’s experiences of using vaginal trainers (dilators) to treat vaginal penetration difficulties diagnosed as vaginismus: a qualitative interview study. BMC Womens Health 15:49.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0201-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Svedhem C, Eckert G, Wijma B (2013) Living with genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder in a heterosexual relationship: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of interviews with eight women. Sex Relatsh Ther 28:336–349.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2013.844785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ayling K, Ussher JM (2008) “If sex hurts, am i still a woman?” the subjective experience of vulvodynia in hetero-sexual women. Arch Sex Behav 37:294–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9204-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Connor JJ, Robinson B, Wieling E (2008) Vulvar pain: a phenomenological study of couples in search of effective diagnosis and treatment. Fam Process 47:139–155.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00245.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Buchan A, Munday P, Ravenhill G et al (2007) A qualitative study of women with vulvodynia I. The journey into treatment. J Reprod Med 52:15–18Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    LePage K, Selk A (2016) What do patients want? a needs assessment of vulvodynia patients attending a vulvar diseases clinic. Sex Med 4:E242–E248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2016.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruna Helena Mellado
    • 1
  • Taynara Louisi Pilger
    • 1
  • Omero Benedicto Poli-Neto
    • 1
  • Julio Cesar Rosa e Silva
    • 1
  • Antonio Alberto Nogueira
    • 1
  • Francisco José Candido dos Reis
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão PretoUniversidade de São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations