Advertisement

Applicability of WHO Maternal Severity Score (MSS) and Maternal Severity Index (MSI) Model to predict the maternal outcome in near miss obstetric patients: a prospective observational study

  • Rubina PanditEmail author
  • Vanita Jain
  • Rashmi Bagga
  • Pooja Sikka
  • Kajal Jain
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To assess the applicability of WHO Maternal Severity Score (MSS) and Maternal Severity Index (MSI) Model in near miss (NM) obstetric patients

Methods

It was a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary health care center from July 2015 to Feb 2016. All patients fulfilling one or more WHO NM criteria were included. MSS and MSI were calculated for all NM patients on admission. They were then followed up till the final outcome (NM or death). Each NM parameter, system-wise MSS, total MSS and MSI were then associated with the final outcome.

Results

Of 4822 patients, 1739 had potentially life-threatening conditions of which 174 were identified as NM. The average MSS and MSI of patients who remained NM was 4.41 and 11.67%, respectively, and those who died was 9.47 and 58.16%, respectively. Both were found to be significantly associated with the outcome (p < 0.001). MSI had good accuracy for maternal death prediction in women with markers of organ dysfunction (AUROC – 0.838 [95% CI 0.766–0.910]). However, of 25 NM criteria, only 17 NM criteria and 3 system dysfunctions (cardiovascular, respiratory and neurological) were found to associate significantly with the outcome.

Conclusion

MSS and MSI act as good prognostic tools to assess the severity of maternal complications and estimate the probability of death in NM patients. As all NM parameters are not equally predictive of severity of maternal morbidity, different scores per NM parameter and system should be assigned while calculating MSS for better prognostication.

Keywords

Near miss Maternal Severity Score Maternal Severity Index 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the hospital staff and resident doctors for their valuable help in collecting all NM. We would also extend our gratitude to Dr Sandeep Satsangi for his contribution in manuscript preparation.

Author contributions

All authors contributed significantly to manuscript preparation. RP was involved in study setup, study design, data review and analysis, data management and drafting of manuscript. VJ conceived the study, participated in study design, data management and manuscript editing. RB and PS performed data review and edited the manuscript. KJ contributed in data analysis and manuscript editing.

Funding

None.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the institute’s ethics committee, PGIMER, Chandigarh, on 11/9/2015 (Reference Number- NK/2210/MD/9907–08).

Informed consent

An informed written consent was obtained from patients/relatives after fully explaining the nature and purpose of study.

Research on animals or humans

This study did not involve any research conducted on animals. An informed written consent was obtained from patients/relatives after fully explaining the nature and purpose of study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kasahun AW, WakoWG, (2018) Predictors of maternal near miss among women admitted in Gurage zone hospitals, South Ethiopia, 2017: a case control study. BMC Pregn Childbirth 18:260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stones W, Lim W, Al-Azzawi F, Kelly M (1991) An investigation of maternal morbidity with identification of life-threatening 'near miss' episodes. Health Trends 23(1):13–15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldenberg RL, Saleem S, Ali S, Moore JL, Lokangako A, Tshefu A et al (2017) Maternal near miss in low-resource areas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 138(3):347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC (2009) Maternal near miss-towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23(3):287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lapinsky SE, Hallett D, Collop N, Drover J, Lavercombe P, Leeman M et al (2011) Evaluation of standard and modified severity of illness scores in the obstetric patient. J Crit Care 26(5):535.e1–535.e7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Souza JP, Cecatti JG, Haddad SM, Parpinelli MA, Costa ML, Katz L et al (2012) The WHO maternal near-miss approach and the maternal severity index model (MSI): tools for assessing the management of severe maternal morbidity. PLoS One 7(8):e44129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Vogel J, Carroli G, Lumbiganon P, Qureshi Z et al (2013) Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): a cross-sectional study. Lancet 381(9879):1747–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakimuli A, Nakubulwa S, Kakaire O, Osinde MO, Mbalinda SN, Nabirye RC et al (2016) Maternal near misses from two referral hospitals in Uganda: a prospective cohort study on incidence, determinants and prognostic factors. BMC Pregn Childbirth 16:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, Darj E, Essén B (2013) Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: A panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregn Childbirth 13:107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norhayati MN, Nik Hazlina NH, Sulaiman Z, Azman MY (2016) Severe maternal morbidity and near misses in tertiary hospitals, Kelantan, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 16:229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oladapo OT, Adetoro OO, Ekele BA, Chama C, Etuk SJ, Aboyeji AP et al (2016) When getting there is not enough: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 998 maternal deaths and 1451 near-misses in public tertiary hospitals in a low-income country. BJOG 123(6):928–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Oliveira Neto AF, Parpinelli MA, Sousa MH, Say L et al (2011) Pre-validation of the WHO organ dysfunction based criteria for identification of maternal near miss. Reprod Health 8:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jabir M, Abdul-Salam I, Suheil DM, Al-Hilli W, Abul-Hassan S, Al-Zuheiri A et al (2013) Maternal near miss and quality of maternal health care in Baghdad. Iraq. BMC Pregn Childbirth 13:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haddad SM, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Sousa MH, Parpinelli MA, Costa ML et al (2014) Applying the maternal near miss approach for the evaluation of quality of obstetric care: a worked example from a multicenter surveillance study. Biomed Res Int 2014:989815Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarhIndia
  2. 2.Department of Reproductive MedicineCloudnine HospitalBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of AnesthesiaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations