Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 300, Issue 1, pp 169–174 | Cite as

Accuracy of frozen section at early clinical stage of endometrioid endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis in Germany

  • G. GitasEmail author
  • L. Proppe
  • I. Alkatout
  • A. Rody
  • C. Kotanidis
  • D. Tsolakidis
  • S. Baum
Gynecologic Oncology
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of intra-operative frozen section (FS) diagnosis during hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods

At the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Luebeck, between 2009 and 2014, the intra-operative FS pathology of 164 patients with pre-operative endometrial curettage, showing G1 or G2 endometrioid EC at an early clinical stage (FIGO I–II), was compared retrospectively with the final paraffin section reports. The accuracy of myometrial invasion (MI) in all patients and separately in stage FIGO I patients was calculated and the under- or overtreatment of the patients was analyzed. A subgroup analysis was performed focusing on the percentage of inadequate staging by FS with clinical consequences.

Results

Concordance of FS and final pathology results in terms of FIGO stage was 85.2%, with an under-diagnosis rate of 14% and an over-diagnosis rate of 0.8%. The subgroup analysis rate of patients who were inappropriately operated using FS was 6.6%, while 3.3% underwent a secondary operation. The overall accuracy of FS in predicting MI was 93.3% and in patients with stage FIGO I, 92.7%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 98.25%, 89.06%, 88.89% and 98.28%, respectively, and in stage FIGO I, 98.25%, 84.62%, 90.32% and 97.06%, respectively.

Conclusion

The authors consider that intra-operative FS is a reliable diagnostic method to identify the clinical stage of EC and especially MI, to determine the necessity of lymphadenectomy. Further development of diagnostic techniques is essential to maximize diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer Intra-operative frozen section Myometrial invasion Intra-operative cancer evaluation 

Notes

Author contributions

Protocol/project development: GG; data collection or management: GG, CK; data analysis: GG, LP, AR; manuscript writing/editing: GG, LP, SB; correction: AR, DT, IA.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Torre LA et al (2015) Global cancer statistic, (2012). CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Agency for Research on Cancer (2014) World Cancer Report 2014. World Health Organization. Chapter 5.12. ISBN.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    FIGO Announcements stages (1988) Revision. Gynecol Oncol 1989:35Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seracchioli R, Solfrini S, Mabrouk M et al (2010) Controversies in surgical staging of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol Int 2010:181963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mariani A, Dowdy S, Cliby W, et al (2008) Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 109:11Y18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganesan R, Brown LJ, Kehoe S, et al (2013) The role of frozen sections in gynaecological oncology: survey of practice in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 166:204–208.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Acs G (2002) Intraoperative consultation in gynecologic pathology. Semi Diagn Pathol 19:237–254Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scurry JP, Sumithran E (1989) An assessment of the value of frozen sections in gynecological surgery. Pathology 21:159–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB (1987) Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 60:2035–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar S, Medeiros F, Dowdy SC, Keeney GL, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Podratz KC et al (2012) A prospective assessment of the reliability of frozen section to direct intraoperative decision making in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 127:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, Parmar MK (2009) Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet 373:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rungruang B, Olawaiye AB (2012) Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Rev Obstet Gynecol 5(1):28–34Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kayikcioglu F, Boran N, Meydanli MM, Tulunay G, Köse FM, Bülbül D (2002) Is frozen-section diagnosis a reliable guide in surgical treatment of stage I endometrial carcinoma? Acta Oncol 41:444–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kir G, Kir M, Cetiner H, Karateke A, Gurbuz A (2004) Diagnostic problems on frozen section examination of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma with special emphasis on the pitfalls of deep adenomyosis with carcinomatous involvement. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 25:211–214Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Attard Montalto S, Coutts M, Devaja O, Summers J, Jyothirmayi R, Papado- poulos A (2008) Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis at surgery in pre-malignant and malignant lesions of the endometrium. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 29:435–440Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Case AS, Rocconi RP, Straughn JM Jr et al (2006) A prospective blinded evaluation of the accuracy of frozen section for the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Obstetr Gynecol 108:1375–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maneschi F, Nardi S, Sarno M, Manicone AM, Perugini A, Partenzi A (2008) Endome- trial carcinoma: intraoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion A prospec- tive study. Miner Ginecol 60:267–272Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Turan T, Oguz E, Unlubilgin E, Tulunay G, Boran N, Demir OF, Kose MF (2013) Accuracy of frozen-section examination for myometrial invasion and grade in endometrial cancer. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B 167(1):90–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quinlivan JA, Petersen RW, Nicklin JL (2001) Accuracy of frozen section for the Operative management of endometrial cancer. BJOG 108:798–803Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar S, Bandyopadhyay S, Semaan A, Shah JP, Mahdi H, Morris R, Munkarah A, Ali-Fehmi R (2011) The role of frozen section in surgical staging of low risk endometrial cancer. PLoS One 6(9): 1–6Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frumovitz M, Slomovitz BM, Singh DK, Broaddus RR, Abrams J, Sun CC, Bevers M, Bodurka DC (2004) Frozen section analyses as predictors of lymphatic spread in patients with early stage uterine cancer. J Am College Surg 199(3):388–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kinkel K, Kaji Y, Yu KK, Segal MR, Lu Y, Powell CB, Hricak H (1999) Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology 212:711–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andreano A, Rechichi G, Rebora P et al (2014) MR diffusion imaging for preoperative staging of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 24:1327–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Undurraga M, Petignat P, Pelte MF, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Loubeyre P (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging to identify risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 104:233–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sanjuan A, Cobo T, Pahisa J, Escaramis G, Ordi J, Ayuso JR et al (2006) Preoperative and intraoperative assessment of myometrial invasion and histologic grade in endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kisu I, Banno K, Lin LY, Ueno A, Abe T, Kouyama K et al (2013) Preoperative and intraoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and frozen sections. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:525–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fishman A, Altaras M, Bernheim J, Cohen I, Beyth Y, Tepper R (2000) The value of transvaginal sonography in the preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in high and low grade endometrial cancer and in comparison to frozen section in grade 1 disease. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 21:128–130Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    van Doorn HC, van der Zee AG, Peeters PH, KroeksMV, van EijkerenMA. Preoperative selection of patients with low-stage endometrial cancer at high risk of pelvic lymph node metastases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002;12:144–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sawicki W, Spiewankiewicz B, Stelmach´ow J, Cendrowski K. The value of ultrasonography in preoperative assessment of selected prognostic factors in endometrial cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24:293–8.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Berretta R, Merisio C, Piantelli G, Rolla M, Giordano G, Melpignano M et al (2008) Preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography and intraoperative gross examination for assessing myometrial invasion by endometrial cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 27:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Savelli L, Testa AC, MabroukM, Zannoni L, Ludovisi M, Seracchioli R, et al. A prospective blinded comparison of the accuracy of transvaginal sonography and frozen section in the assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:549–52.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jantarasaengaram S, Praditphol N, Tansathit T, Vipupinyo C, Vairojanavong K (2013) Three-dimensional ultrasound using volume contrast imaging (VCI) display for the preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrial cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43:569–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yildirim N, Saatli B, Kose S, Sancar C, Ulukus C, Koyuncuoglu M, Saygili U, Obuz F (2018) Predictability of myometrial, lower uterine segment and cervical invasion with 3D transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer patients: a prospective cohort study. Med Ultrason. 20(3):348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Berretta R, Merisio C, Piantelli G, et al. Preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography and intraoperative gross examination for assessing myometrial invasion by endometrial cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:349-355.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sato S, Itamochi H, Shimada M, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative assessments of depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19: 884-887.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Alcazar JL, Dominguez-Piriz J, Juez L, Caparros M, Jurado M (2016) Intraoperative Gross Examination and Intraoperative Frozen Section in Patients With Endometrial Cancer for Detecting Deep Myometrial Invasion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 26(2):407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital Schleswig HolsteinLuebeckGermany
  2. 2.Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital Schleswig HolsteinKielGermany
  3. 3.1st Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations