Advertisement

Laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a prospective observational study assessing perioperative complications in 244 patients

  • Shaheen KhazaliEmail author
  • Atefeh Gorgin
  • Arash Mohazzab
  • Roxana Kargar
  • Roya Padmehr
  • Khadije Shadjoo
  • Vasilis Minas
General Gynecology

Abstract

Purpose

To examine peri-operative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

Methods

This was a prospective study of a case series of women having laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis from September 2013 through August 2016 in a tertiary referral center for endometriosis and minimally invasive gynaecological surgery in Iran. Data collected included demographics, baseline characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative data up to 1 month following surgery.

Results

We analysed data from 244 consecutive patients, who underwent radical laparoscopic excision of all visible DIE. Major postoperative complications occurred in 3 (1.2%) and minor complications in 27 (11.1%) of patients. 80.3% of our patient group had Stage IV endometriosis. Segmental bowel resection was performed in 34 (13.9%), disc resection in 7 (2.9%), rectal shave in 53 (21.7%). Joint operating between a gynaecologist and colorectal and/or urological colleague was required in 29.6% of cases. The mean operating time was 223.8 min (± 80.7 standard deviation, range 60–440 min) and mean hospital stay was 2.9 days (± 1.5 standard deviation, range 1–11). The conversion to laparotomy rate was 1.6%.

Conclusions

A combination of different laparoscopic surgical techniques to completely excise all visible DIE, within the context of a tertiary referral center offering multi-disciplinary approach, produces safe outcomes with low complication rates.

Keywords

Laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis Deeply infiltrating endometriosis Recto-vaginal endometriosis Surgical complications Multi-disciplinary team 

Notes

Author contribution

SK: Project development, Lead surgeon, Manuscript writing and editing, Data analysis. AG: Surgeon, Manuscript writing, Data collection, management and analysis. AM: Database design, project coordination, Data analysis. RK: Surgeon, Data collection. RP: Surgeon, Data collection. KS: Surgeon, Data collection. VM: Data analysis, Manuscript writing and editing

Funding

No external funding was used for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of the Avicenna Research Institute, affiliated to the Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards (Ethical Committee approval number IR.ACECR.Avicenna.REC.1395.1).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study. No minors were included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Giudice LC, Kao LC (2004) Endometriosis. Lancet 364:1789–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B, Heikinheimo O, Horne AW, Kiesel L, Nap A, Prentice A, Saridogan E, Soriano D, Nelen W (2014) European society of human reproduction and embryology ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 29:400–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Minas V, Dada T (2014) Laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis and effects on quality of life: a retrospective study using the short form EHP-5 endometriosis specific questionnaire. J Obstet Gynaecol 34:336–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seracchioli R, Mabrouk M, Manuzzi L, Guerrini M, Villa G, Montanari G, Fabbri E, Venturoli S (2008) Importance of retroperitoneal ureteric evaluation in cases of deep infiltrating endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:435–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Minelli L, Ceccaroni M, Ruffo G, Bruni F, Pomini P, Pontrelli G, Rolla M, Scioscia M (2010) Laparoscopic conservative surgery for stage IV symptomatic endometriosis: short-term surgical complications. Fertil Steril 94:1218–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2017) Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline (NG73). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng73/resources/endometriosis-diagnosis-and-management-pdf-1837632548293
  7. 7.
    Wolthuis AM, Tomassetti C (2014) Multidisciplinary laparoscopic treatment for bowel endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Wattiez A, Donnez J (2012) Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil Steril 98:564–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donnez J, Jadoul P, Colette S, Luyckx M, Squifflet J, Donnez O (2013) Deep rectovaginal endometriotic nodules: perioperative complications from a series of 3298 patients operated on by the shaving technique. Gynecol Surg 10:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Byrne D, Curnow T, Smith P, Cutner A, Saridogan E, Clark TJ, BSGE Endometriosis Centres (2018) Laparoscopic excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis in BSGE endometriosis centres: a multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 8:e018924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haas D, Wurm P, Shamiyeh A, Shebl O, Chvatal R, Oppelt P (2013) Efficacy of the revised Enzian classification: a retrospective analysis. does the revised Enzian classification solve the problem of duplicate classification in rASRM and Enzian? Arch Gynecol Obstet 287:941–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Minas V, Gul N, Aust T, Doyle M, Rowlands D (2014) Urinary tract injuries in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery; prevention, recognition and management. Obstet Gynaecol 16:19–28Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kondo W, Bourdel N, Tamburro S, Cavoli D, Jardon K, Rabischong B, Botchorishvili R, Pouly J, Mage G, Canis M (2011) Complications after surgery for deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. BJOG 118:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donnez J, Squifflet J (2010) Complications, pregnancy and recurrence in a prospective series of 500 patients operated on by the shaving technique for deep rectovaginal endometriotic nodules. Hum Reprod 25:1949–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klugsberger B, Shamiyeh A, Oppelt P, Jabkowski C, Schimetta W, Haas D (2015) Clinical outcome after colonic resection in women with endometriosis. Biomed Res Int 2015:514383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emmanuel KR, Davis C (2005) Outcomes and treatment options in rectovaginal endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:399–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleisch MC, Xafis D, Bruyne FD, Hucke J, Bender HG, Dall P (2005) Radical resection of invasive endometriosis with bowel or bladder involvement—long-term results. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keckstein J, Wiesinger H (2006) The laparoscopic treatment of intestinal endometriosis. In: Sutton C, Jones K, David Adamson G (eds) Endometriosis. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, pp 177–187Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meuleman C, D’Hoore A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Beks N, D’Hooghe T (2009) Outcome after multidisciplinary CO2 laser laparoscopic excision of deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis. Reprod BioMed Online 18:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meuleman C, Tomasseti C, D’Hoore A, Buyens A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Fieuws S, Penninckx F, Vergote I, D’Hooghe T (2011) Clinical outcome after CO2 laser laparoscopic radical excision of endometriosis with colorectal wall invasion combined with laparoscopic segmental bowel resection and reanastomosis. Hum Reprod 26:2336–2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abo C, Moatassim S, Marty N, Saint Ghislain M, Huet E, Bridoux V, Tuech JJ, Roman H (2018) Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 109:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Darai E, Ackerman G, Bazot M, Rouzier R, Dubernard G (2007) Laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis: limits and complications. Surg Endosc 21:1572–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D’Hoore A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Penninckx F, Vergote I, D’Hooghe T (2011) Surgical treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement. Hum Reprod Update 17:311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaheen Khazali
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Atefeh Gorgin
    • 2
  • Arash Mohazzab
    • 2
  • Roxana Kargar
    • 2
  • Roya Padmehr
    • 2
  • Khadije Shadjoo
    • 2
  • Vasilis Minas
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Endometriosis and Minimally Invasive Gynaecology (CEMIG), Ashford & St. Peter’s Hospital NHS Foundation TrustChertseyUK
  2. 2.Avicenna Centre for Endometriosis and Minimally Invasive Gynaecology (ACEMIG)Avicenna Research Institute, ACECRTehranIran
  3. 3.Royal Holloway-University of LondonEghamUK

Personalised recommendations