Advertisement

Effect of maternal and embryonic factors on frozen-thawed IVF-ET outcome after pre-equilibration with hyaluronan

  • Weizhou Wang
  • Likun Ren
  • Deli Wei
  • Yuliang Shen
  • Bin Liu
  • Xina Wang
  • Fu Chen
  • Min Li
  • Ling Yan
  • Zhichun Feng
  • Wei Shang
Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To systematically evaluate the effect of maternal and embryonic factors on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcomes among Chinese patients after using hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium (HETM).

Methods

This retrospective study included 637 frozen-thawed ET cycles. Patients were divided into subgroups based on their maternal or embryonic status or treatment procedures. The implantation, clinical pregnancy, delivery, and abortion rates were compared between the HETM and control groups. In addition, the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were used to analyze the reciprocal effect of HETM and Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) assessment.

Results

Maternal risk factors, especially maternal aging and a low number of retrieved oocytes, have a significant adverse impact on the efficacy of HETM usage. Endometrial preparation with artificial and natural cycles but not stimulated cycles showed a satisfying outcome after IVF-ET treatment. Compared with cleavage embryos, blastocyst stage embryo transfer showed more prominent improvement when using HETM. Prolonged pre-equilibration treatment with HETM notably compromised the IVF-ET outcome. PGS-based preselection could further facilitate the HETM-induced beneficial effect on IVF-ET outcomes. The body weight, length, and sex ratio of the neonate did not significantly differ between the HETM and control groups.

Conclusion

Both the maternal and embryonic status or treatment procedures affected the IVF-ET outcomes after using HETM. HETM had a beneficial effect on advantaged IVF cycles but did not improve the outcomes of disadvantaged IVF cycles. Endometrial preparation with stimulated cycles is not recommended when using HETM. Prolonged pre-equilibration treatment must be avoided.

Keywords

IVF Embryo transfer Hyaluronan Pregnancy rate Implantation rate Frozen-thawed embryos 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the PLA Key Research Program (no. 17JS004).

Author contribution

WW and LR: Data collection, analysis, and manuscript writing; DW: Data collection and analysis; YS, BL, XW, FC: IVF/ICIS procedures; ML, LY: Embryo transfer and PGS; WS and ZF: Project development and experimental design.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang HB, Dey SK (2006) Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models. Nat Rev Genet 7:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cha J, Sun X, Dey SK (2012) Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat Med 18:1754–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diedrich K, Fauser BC, Devroey P (2007) Griesinger G The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update 13:365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norwitz ER, Schust DJ, Fisher SJ (2001) Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. N Engl J Med 345:1400–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melford SE, Taylor AH, Konje JC (2014) Of mice and (wo)men: factors influencing successful implantation including endocannabinoids. Hum Reprod Update 20:415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Margalioth EJ, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M, Eldar-Geva T (2006) Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET. Hum Reprod 21:3036–3043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (2014) ART fact sheet Beigem, Belgium: European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://www.eshre.eu/~/media/sitecore-files/Annual-meeting/Munich/ARTfactsheet-201120062014.pdf
  8. 8.
    Edwards RG (2006) Human implantation: the last barrier in assisted reproduction technologies? Reprod Biomed Online 13:887–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Opoien HK, Fedorcsak P, Omland AK, Abyholm T, Bjercke S, Ertzeid G, Oldereid N, Mellembakken JR, Tanbo T (2012) In vitro fertilization is a successful treatment in endometriosis-associated infertility. Fertil Steril 97:912–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Niakan KK, Han J, Pedersen RA, Simon C, Pera RA (2012) Human pre-implantation embryo development. Development 139:829–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wale PL, Gardner DK (2016) The effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryo culture and their importance for the practice of assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 22:2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chronopoulou E, Harper JC (2015) IVF culture media: past, present and future. Hum Reprod Update 21:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fenderson BA, Stamenkovic I, Aruffo A (1993) localization of hyaluronan in mouse embryos during implantation, gastrulation and organogenesis. Differentiation 54:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carson DD, Dutt A, Tang JP (1987) Glycoconjugate synthesis during early-pregnancy—hyaluronate synthesis and function. Dev Biol 120:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Campbell S, Swann HR, Aplin JD, Seif MW, Kimber SJ, Elstein M (1995) CD44 IS expressed throughout preimplantation human embryo development. Hum Reprod 10:425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Behzad F, Seif MW, Campbell S, Aplin JD (1994) Expression of 2 isoforms of cd44 in human endometrium. Biol Reprod 51:739–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gardner DK, Rodriegez-Martinez H, Lane M (1999) Fetal development after transfer is increased by replacing protein with the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan for mouse embryo culture and transfer. Hum Reprod 14:2575–2580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stojkovic M, Kolle S, Peinl S, Stojkovic P, Zakhartchenko V, Thompson JG, Wenigerkind H, Reichenbach HD, Sinowatz F, Wolf E (2002) Effects of high concentrations of hyaluronan in culture medium on development and survival rates of fresh and frozen-thawed bovine embryos produced in vitro. Reproduction 124:141–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Urman B, Yakin K, Ata B, Isiklar A (2008) Balaban B Effect of hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium on implantation and pregnancy rates after day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 90:604–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Valojerdi MR, Karimian L, Yazdi PE, Gilani M, Madani T, Baghestani AR (2006) Efficacy of a human embryo transfer medium: a prospective, randomized clinical trial study. J Assist Reprod Gen 23:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bontekoe S, Heineman MJ, Johnson N, Blake D (2014) Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies. Cochrane Database Syst RevGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Loutradi KE, Prassas I, Bili E, Sanopoulou T, Bontis I, Tarlatzis BC (2007) Evaluation of a transfer medium containing high concentration of hyaluronan in human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 87:48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fancsovits P, Lehner A, Murber A, Kaszas Z, Rigo J, Urbancsek J (2015) Effect of hyaluronan-enriched embryo transfer medium on IVF outcome: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291:1173–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F, Wilson RD, Brock J, Campagnolo C, Carroll J, Chong K, Gagnon A, Johnson J, MacDonald W, Okun N, Pastuck M, Vallee-Pouliot K (2015) Technical update: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Obstet Gynecol Surv 70:557–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nakagawa K, Takahashi C, Nishi Y, Jyuen H, Sugiyama R, Kuribayashi Y (2012) Sugiyama R Hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium improves outcome in patients with multiple embryo transfer failures. J Assist Reprod Gen 29:679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nakagawa K, Yamano S, Moride N, Yamashita M, Yoshizawa M, Aono T (2001) Effect of activation with Ca ionophore A23187 and puromycin on the development of human oocytes that failed to fertilize after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 76:148–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Souza A, Sampaio M, Noronha GB, Coster L, de Oliveira R, Geber S (2017) Effect of follicular flushing on reproductive outcomes in patients with poor ovarian response undergoing assisted reproductive technology. J Assist Reprod Genet 34:1353–1357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kansal KS, Ratcliffe S, Gracia CR, Martino L, Coutifaris C, Barnhart KT (2008) Randomized controlled pilot trial of luteal phase recombinant FSH stimulation in poor responders. Reprod Biomed Online 17:745–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yan L, Yang M, Guo H, Yang L, Wu J, Li R, Liu P, Lian Y, Zheng X, Yan J, Huang J, Li M, Wu X, Wen L, Lao K, Li R, Qiao J (2013) Tang F Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maalouf WE, Mincheva MN, Campbell BK, Hardy IC (2014) Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on human sex ratio at birth. Fertil Steril 101:1321–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dean JH, Chapman MG, Sullivan EA (2010) The effect on human sex ratio at birth by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures—an assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002–2006. BJOG 117:1628–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chuang CC, Chen CD, Chao KH, Chen SU, Ho HN, Yang YS (2003) Age is a better predictor of pregnancy potential than basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 79:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    La Marca A, Giulini S, Tirelli A, Bertucci E, Marsella T, Xella S, Volpe A (2007) Anti-Mullerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 22:766–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hendriks DJ, Mol B, Bancsi L, Te Velde ER, Broekmans F (2005) Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal folliclestimulating hormone level. Fertil Steril 83:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Scholtes M, Zeilmaker GH (1998) Blastocyst transfer in day-5 embryo transfer depends primarily on the number of oocytes retrieved and not an age. Fertil Steril 69:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Charulata C, Mantravadi K, Rao DG (2017) Hyaluronan enriched embryo transfer media improves Reproductive outcomes in frozen thawed cycles for couples with repeated implantation failure. Hum Reprod 321:238–239Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fu W, Yu M, Zhang XJ (2018) Effect of hyaluronic acid-enriched transfer medium on frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 44:747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chun S, Seo JE, Rim YJ, Joo JH, Lee YC, Koo YH (2016) Efficacy of hyaluronan-rich transfer medium on implantation and pregnancy rates in fresh and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers in Korean women with previous implantation failure. Obstet Gynecol Sci 59:201–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dietterich C, Check JH, Summers-Chase D, Yuan W, Brasile D (2007) “Embryo Glue” does not seem to improve chances of subsequent pregnancy in refractory in vitro fertilization cases. Fertil Steril 87:13–14Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AEP, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ (2017) What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis (vol 19, pg 458, 2013). Hum Reprod Update 23:255–261Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Page KL, Guibert J, Weitzen S, Davy C, Fauque P, Olivennes F (2005) A prospective randomized trial evaluating endometrial preparation for implantation of frozen/thawed embryos using an artificial cycle versus a stimulated cycle. Fertil Steril 841:S171–S172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wright KP, Guibert J, Weitzen S, Davy C, Fauque P, Olivennes F (2006) Artificial versus stimulated cycles for endometrial preparation prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 13:321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kawamura T, Motoyama H, Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Arichi A, Karasawa Y, Suga K, Miya K, Ishikawa S, Mizushima S, Kawamura M (2007) Clinical outcomes of two different endometrial preparation methods for cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in patients with a normal menstrual cycle. Reprod Med Biol 6:53–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Safari S, Razi MH, Safari S, Razi Y (2015) Routine use of EmbryoGlue((R)) as embryo transfer medium does not improve the ART outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291:433–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jansen K, van der Werff J, van Wachem PB, Nicolai J, de Leij L, van Luyn M (2004) A hyaluronan-based nerve guide: in vitro cytotoxicity, subcutaneous tissue reactions, and degradation in the rat. Biomaterials 25:483–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Afify AM, Craig S, Paulino AFG (2006) Temporal variation in the distribution of hyaluronic acid, CD44s, and CD44v6 in the human endometrium across the menstrual cycle. Appl Immunohisto M M 14:328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Choudhary M, Zhang X, Stojkovic P, Hyslop L, Anyfantis G, Herbert M, Murdoch AP, Stojkovic M, Lako M (2007) Putative role of hyaluronan and its related genes, HAS2 and RHAMM, in human early preimplantation embryogenesis and embryonic stem cell characterization. Stem Cells 25:3045–3057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bourguignon L, Singleton PA, Zhu HB, Zhou B (2002) Hyaluronan promotes signaling interaction between CD44 and the transforming growth factor beta receptor I in metastatic breast tumor cells. J Biol Chem 277:39703–39712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang SJ, Bourguignon LYM (2006) Hyaluronan and the interaction between CD44 and epidermal growth factor receptor in oncogenic signaling and chemotherapy resistance in head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Assisted Reproductive Centre of the Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsPLA Naval General HospitalBeijingChina
  2. 2.Affiliated BaYi Children’s Hospital, PLA Army General HospitalBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations