Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: how does training for surgeons in a standardized operation affect hospitals and patients?
- 35 Downloads
Surgical training usually means inexperienced physicians initially doing operations supervised by an experienced physician, to gain the experience and skills needed to conduct surgery independently. Various issues arise here for both hospitals and patients. Are training procedures associated with higher complication rates, blood losses, and transfusion rates? What does training in the operating room ultimately cost in terms of valuable surgical time? Do longer hospitalization periods potentially mean financial losses for the hospital under the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system?
A retrospective analysis was carried out of data for 571 patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in the Department of Gynecology at the University of Erlangen from 2009 to 2012, with/without adnexectomy, due to benign indication; and of data for 255 patients who underwent the same procedures in Karlsruhe Municipal Hospital in 2013–2014. The patients were classified into two groups: those in whom surgery was carried out by experienced specialists who had carried out at least 40 independent operations; and those in whom it was carried out by a trainee resident who had personally done fewer than 40 operations.
In the two groups, the patients had similar mean body mass indexes, uterus weights, and blood losses. Patients in the specialist group were slightly older. There were no differences in complication rates. Over two-thirds of complications occurred in patients with previous surgery. Procedures by residents took significantly longer. Hospitalization periods in both groups were still below the mean threshold length of stay under Germany’s DRG system, so that no income losses occurred even with training procedures.
Training and teaching operations supervised by experienced surgeons are just as safe as operations by experienced surgeons themselves. Interpretation of these data is of course limited by the retrospective study design; patients treated by specialists tended to have more prior operations and were older, with a trend toward larger uteri. Surgical training, as the example of TLH in benign indication shows here, involves an additional time of approximately 10–20 min per operation. With regard to the revenue situation, the hospitalization periods in both groups were within the profit zone for the hospital concerned.
KeywordsHysterectomy Training Complication rate Laparoscopy Revenue situation
TH: data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript, writing/editing. SE: data collection or management. AB: data collection or management. MWB: supervising/proof reading. AM: project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in the survey involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and national research committee (Ethic Committee of Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg). The study does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Landesärztekammer B (2012) Weiterbildungsordnung für die Ärzte Bayerns vom 24.04.2004 i. d. F. d. Beschlüsse vom 16.10.2011 Richtlinien über den Inhalt der Weiterbildung i. d. F. vom 21.04.2012Google Scholar
- 2.Prutz F, Knopf H, von der Lippe E, Scheidt-Nave C, Starker A, Fuchs J (2013) Prevalence of hysterectomy in women 18 to 79 years old: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 56(5–6):716–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1660-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Neis KJ, Zubke W, Romer T, Schwerdtfeger K, Schollmeyer T, Rimbach S, Holthaus B, Solomayer E, Bojahr B, Neis F, Reisenauer C, Gabriel B, Dieterich H, Runnenbaum IB, Kleine W, Strauss A, Menton M, Mylonas I, David M, Horn LC, Schmidt D, Gass P, Teichmann AT, Brandner P, Stummvoll W, Kuhn A, Muller M, Fehr M, Tamussino K (2016) Indications and route of hysterectomy for benign diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76(4):350–364. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-104288 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Jokinen E, Brummer T, Jalkanen J, Fraser J, Heikkinen AM, Makinen J, Sjoberg J, Tomas E, Mikkola TS, Harkki P (2015) Hysterectomies in Finland in 1990–2012: comparison of outcomes between trainees and specialists. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94(7):701–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12654 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Fiori W, Renner SP, Siam K, Babapirali J, Roeder N, Dausch E, Hildebrandt T, Hillemanns P, Nehmzow M, Zygmunt M, Piroth D, Schem C, Schwenzer T, Friese K, Wallwiener D, Beckmann W (2013) Shaping the system—the DRG evaluation project of the German Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Gynakologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG). Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350748 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fiaccavento A, Landi S, Barbieri F, Zaccoletti R, Tricolore C, Ceccaroni M, Pomini P, Bruni F, Soriano D, Stepniewska A, Selvaggi L, Zanolla L, Minelli L (2007) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in cases of very large uteri: a retrospective comparative study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(5):559–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.04.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Heinberg EM, Crawford BL 3rd, Weitzen SH, Bonilla DJ (2004) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese versus nonobese patients. Obstet Gynecol 103(4):674–680. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000119224.68677.72 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Becker S, Hirsch HA, Käser O, Iklé FA, Schmidt EH, De Wilde RL, Abele H, Bachmann C, Brucker S, Fehm T, Gardanis K, Grischke EM, Goerner R, Hahn M, Hoffmann J, Hornung R, Krainick-Strobel U, Krämer B, Reisenauer C, Röhm C, Solomayer E, Zubke W (2009) Atlas der gynäkologischen Operationen. 7., vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage edn. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-002-46977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Advani V, Ahad S, Gonczy C, Markwell S, Hassan I (2012) Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP. Am J Surg 203(3):347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.015 (discussion 351-342) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Akingba DH, Deniseiko-Sanses TV, Melick CF, Ellerkmann RM, Matsuo K (2008) Outcomes of hysterectomies performed by supervised residents vs those performed by attendings alone. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 199(6):673.e671–673.e676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar