Reconstructive breast surgery with partially absorbable bi-component Seragyn® BR soft mesh: an outcome analysis
Synthetic meshes and acellular dermal matrices are increasingly used in implant-based breast reconstruction. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and severity of complications following the implantation of the partially absorbable bi-component soft mesh SERAGYN® BR and assess risk factors for adverse operative outcomes.
A retrospective clinical study was performed: The SERAGYN® BR soft mesh was utilized in 148 operations (skin-sparing mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, and secondary reconstruction after mastectomy) in four different institutions in Germany from June 2012 to February 2014. We analyzed whether the results were affected by tumor morphology (e.g., grading), patient characteristics and comorbidities, previous surgery or therapies, and use of alloplastic materials.
The SERAGYN® BR soft mesh was successfully implanted in 131 of 148 operations. The rate of reconstructive failure was 11.5%. The most common complication was seroma (25.7%), followed by hematoma and skin infection (each 14.2%). Wound-healing issues were detected in 13.5% cases, secondary wound infections in 10.8%. 83.8% of operations had no severe complications. Independent predictors for reconstructive failure were wound-healing issues, nipple- or skin necrosis, wound- or skin infections, a high volume of excised tissue, hematomas, seromas, and sentinel lymph node excisions. A higher body mass index was correlated with a higher rate of infection.
SERAGYN® BR mesh can be used successfully in breast reconstructive surgery. Rates of major complications or reconstructive failure are comparable to the use of other synthetic or biological meshes.
KeywordsBreast Surgery Mesh Reconstruction Cancer
Deep inferior epigastric perforators
Acellular dermal matrix
Transverse rectus abdominis muscle
Good clinical practice
Sentinel lymph node excision
Lymph node excision
We would like to thank all patients and investigators for the support.
Protocol/project development: S-FN, BJU, KE, and PS; data collection and management: S-FN and DS; data analysis: MA, S-FN, KJ, WG, DS, OR, KE, and PS; manuscript writing/editing: MA, S-FN, WG, BJU, KJ, DS, and OR.
Unrestricted financial grant by SERAG-WIESSNER.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
JU Blohmer, A Machleidt, J Kueper, N Schmidt-Feuerheerd, G von Waldenfels, S Dittmer, and E Klein no conflict of interest. Ohlinger S and Paepke S Honoraria and support for traveling expenses and training until 2015 by SERAG-WIESSNER GmbH & Co. KG, Naila, Germany.
- 1.Leitlinie S Mammakarzinom der Frau; Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge; http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/032-045OL.html. Accessed 16 Apr 2017
- 3.Marsh D, Patel NG, Rozen WM, Chowdhry MR, Sharma H, Ramakrishnan VV (2016) Three routine free flaps per day in a single operating theatre: principles of a process mapping approach to improving surgical efficiency. Gland Surg 5(2):107–114. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2227-684x.2015.07.04 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Leitlinie Brustrekonstruktion mit Eigengewebe der German Society of Gynecology and obstetrics in cooperation with AWMF (Arbeitsgemeinschaften der wissenschaftlichen medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e.v.), S Leitlinie Stand 05/2015Google Scholar
- 6.Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T (2009) The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg 249(3):461–468. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31819a044f CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Newman MI, Swartz KA, Samson MC, Mahoney CB, Diab K (2011) The true incidence of near-term postoperative complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction utilizing human acellular dermal matrices: a meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35(1):100–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9631-6 Epub 2010 Dec 24 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dieterich M, Reimer T, Dieterich H, Stubert J, Gerber B (2012) A short-term follow-up of implant based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLoop(®) Bra). Eur J Surg Oncol 38(12):1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2012.08.026 Epub 2012 Sep 13 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Dieterich M, Stubert J, Gerber B, Reimer T, Richter DU (2015) Biocompatibility, cell growth and clinical relevance of synthetic meshes and biological matrixes for internal support in implant-based breast reconstruction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(6):1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3578-9 Epub 2014 Dec 13 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Serag-Wiessner: https://www.serag-wiessner.de/produkte/textile-implantate/seragyn-br/. Accessed 16 Apr 2017
- 14.Arbeitsgemeinschaft gynäkologische Onkologie: https://www.ago-online.de. Accessed 16 Apr 2017
- 20.Ibrahim AM, Shuster M, Koolen PG, Kim K, Taghinia AH, Sinno HH, Lee BT, Lin SJ (2013) Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1057–1066. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a3beec CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Dieterich M, Paepke S, Zwiefel K, Dieterich H, Blohmer J, Faridi A, Klein E, Gerber B, Nestle-Kraemling C (2013) Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):8e–19e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e318290f8a0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.ten Wolde B, van den Wildenberg FJ, Keemers-Gels ME, Polat F, Strobbe LJ (2014) Quilting prevents seroma formation following breast cancer surgery: closing the dead space by quilting prevents seroma following axillary lymph node dissection and mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):802–807. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3359-x Epub 2013 Nov 12 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, Arora BP, Katz SM, Gelfand MA, Khan SU, Dagum AB, Bui DT (2010) The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 64(5):674–678. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0b013e3181dba892 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, Davidge K, Hinson A, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG (2008) Pusic AL Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(6):1886–1892. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e31817151c4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar