Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 298, Issue 3, pp 649–654 | Cite as

The influence of seasonal variations on in vitro fertilization and fresh/frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective study

  • Yu Xiao
  • Min Wang
  • Kai Liu
Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether seasonal variations can affect the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET).

Methods

The data of 2868 IVF–ET cycles over 5 years from patients treated for fallopian tube factors, oligospermia, and asthenospermia were collected retrospectively. The cycles were divided into four seasonal groups based on the day of ET. All cycles were performed using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist protocols. The ovarian response, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes were compared among groups. In addition, 4106 frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles performed during the same period were analyzed, and the pregnancy outcomes were compared among the four seasonal groups.

Results

The total dose of gonadotropin in the winter group (2106.04 ± 705.57 IU) was higher than the doses in the spring and summer groups (1994.06 ± 674.95, 2009.07 ± 742.26 IU, P < 0.05). The numbers of total oocytes, matured oocytes, fertilizations, cleavages, and high-quality embryos were comparable among seasonal groups (P > 0.05). Significant differences were not observed among seasonal groups in ET or FET for the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and miscarriage rate (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Seasonal variations have little influence on the outcomes of IVF–ET and FET. IVF–ET or FET treatment can be performed during any season.

Keywords

Season In vitro fertilization Embryo transfer Pregnancy rate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors wish to acknowledge Rong Li, MD, Chief of the Reproductive Medical Center, for her general support in the study. We also want to thank Xiaosheng Lu, MD, for her assistance in writing the article.

Author contributions

YX: Protocol development, data collection, and manuscript writing. MW: Data collection, manuscript writing and editing. KL: Data analysis and manuscript editing.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

Our study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital (IPMCH) of China Welfare Institute (IRB reference number: GKLW 2017-51). All patients admitted at our center had consented to the anonymous use of their medical data for scientific research, publication and/or quality assessment, and informed consents were previously signed at the beginning of their treatments. And because the study was designed to retrospectively analyze the data of patients who had finished their treatments, further consent was not necessary.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Revelli A, La Sala GB, Gennarelli G, Scatigna L, Racca C, Massobrio M (2005) Seasonality and human in vitro fertilization outcome. Gynecol Endocrinol 21(1):12–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590500098307 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weisz N, Friger M, Har-Vardi I (2013) Seasonal variations of human sperm cells among 6455 semen samples: a plausible explanation of a seasonal birth pattern. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 208(5):406.e401–406.e406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wood S, Quinn A, Troupe S, Kingsland C, Lewis-Jones I (2006) Seasonal variation in assisted conception cycles and the influence of photoperiodism on outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Fertil 9(4):223–229.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14647270600806557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rojansky N, Benshushan A, Meirsdorf S, Lewin A, Laufer N, Safran A (2000) Seasonal variability in fertilization and embryo quality rates in women undergoing IVF. Fertil Steril 74(3):476–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vandekerckhove F, Van der Veken H, Tilleman K, De Croo I, Van den Abbeel E, Gerris J, De Sutter P (2016) Seasons in the sun: the impact on IVF results one month later. Facts Views Vis ObGyn 8(2):75–83PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weigert M, Feichtinger W, Kulin S, Kaali SG, Dorau P, Bauer P (2001) Seasonal influences on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 18(11):598–602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Franasiak JM, Molinaro TA, Dubell EK, Scott KL, Ruiz AR, Forman EJ, Werner MD, Hong KH, Scott RT Jr (2015) Vitamin D levels do not affect IVF outcomes following the transfer of euploid blastocysts. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 212(3):315 e311–315 e316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tomic J, Tomic V (2011) Influence of seasonal variations on in vitro fertilization success. Coll Antropol 35(2):543–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wunder DM, Limoni C, Birkhauser MH, Swiss F-G (2005) Lack of seasonal variations in fertilization, pregnancy and implantation rates in women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod 20(11):3122–3129.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei177 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Braga DP, Setti A, Figueira Rde C, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr (2012) Seasonal variability in the fertilization rate of women undergoing assisted reproduction treatments. Gynecol Endocrinol 28(7):549–552.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2011.649812 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eryilmaz OG, Devran A, Sarikaya E, Aksakal FN, Mollamahmutoglu L, Cicek N (2011) Melatonin improves the oocyte and the embryo in IVF patients with sleep disturbances, but does not improve the sleeping problems. J Assist Reprod Genet 28(9):815–820.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9604-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Danilenko KV, Sergeeva OY (2015) Immediate effect of blue-enhanced light on reproductive hormones in women. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 36(1):84–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chojnacki C, Walecka-Kapica E, Lokiec K, Pawlowicz M, Winczyk K, Chojnacki J, Klupinska G (2013) Influence of melatonin on symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in postmenopausal women. Endokrynol P 64(2):114–120Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neville G, Martyn F, Kilbane M, O’Riordan M, Wingfield M, McKenna M, McAuliffe FM (2016) Vitamin D status and fertility outcomes during winter among couples undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr 135(2):172–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harbach H, Antrecht K, Boedeker RH, Brenck F, Gips H, Hempelmann G, Muehling J, Welters I, Zygmunt M (2008) Response of proopiomelanocortin and gonado- or lactotroph systems to in vitro fertilisation procedures stress. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 141(2):137–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.08.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rudick B, Ingles S, Chung K, Stanczyk F, Paulson R, Bendikson K (2012) Characterizing the influence of vitamin D levels on IVF outcomes. Hum Reprod 27(11):3321–3327.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des280 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Polyzos NP, Anckaert E, Guzman L, Schiettecatte J, Van Landuyt L, Camus M, Smitz J, Tournaye H (2014) Vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy rates in women undergoing single embryo, blastocyst stage, transfer (SET) for IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 29(9):2032–2040.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu156 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Reproductive Medical Center, The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of MedicineShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations