Advertisement

The anatomical properties of the indirect head of the rectus femoris tendon: a cadaveric study with clinical significance for labral reconstruction surgery

  • Ran AtzmonEmail author
  • Zachary T. Sharfman
  • Ehud Atoun
  • Thomas G. Sampson
  • Eyal Amar
  • Ehud Rath
Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Acetabular labral tear is a common pathology. In some clinical situations, primary labral repair may not be possible and labral reconstruction is indicated.

Purpose and clinical relevance

Describe the anatomy of the indirect head of the rectus femoris (IHRF) tendon with clinical application in arthroscopic labral reconstruction surgery.

Methods

Twenty-six cadaver hips were dissected. Thirteen measurements, each with clinical relevance to arthroscopic labral reconstruction using an IHRF tendon graft were taken on each hip. All measurements were taken in triplicate. Mean values, standard deviations and intra-observer reliability were calculated.

Results

The mean footprint of the direct head of the rectus femoris tendon was 10.6 mm × 19.6 mm. The width and thickness at the confluence of both heads were 10.9 mm and 6.9 mm, respectively. The mean total length of the footprint and “free portion” of the IHRF was 55.3 mm, the mean cranial to caudal footprint measured at the 12 o’clock, 1 o’clock, and 2 o’clock positions were 22.3 mm. The mean length of the Indirect Head footprint alone was 38.1 mm. The mean length of IHRF tendon suitable for grafting was 46.1 mm and the mean number of clock face sectors covered by this graft was 3.3 clock face sectors. Intra-observer reliability was ≥ 0.90 for all recorded measurements. The origin of the IHRF on the acetabulum fans out posteriorly, becoming thinner and wider as the origin travels posteriorly. The tendon footprint is firmly attached on the lateral wall of the ilium and becomes a free tendon overlying the acetabular bone as it travels anteriorly and distally towards its muscular attachment.

Conclusion

The IHRF tendon is in an ideal location for harvesting and contains the appropriate thickness, length and triangular architecture to serve as a safe and local graft source for acetabular labral reconstruction surgery.

Keywords

Autograft Rectus femoris Reconstruction Labrum Femoroacetabular impingement 

Abbreviations

IHRF

Indirect head of rectus femoris

FAI

Femoroacetabular impingement

TFL

Tensor fascia lata

AIIS

Anterior inferior iliac spine

DHRF

Direct head of rectus femoris

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Mrs. Rachel Oz, Dr. Alex Hari, Mrs. Ada Feldman and Dr. Tatiana Melnikoy of the Tel Aviv University Anatomy Department for sharing their expertise and experience in the delicate field of anatomical dissection and research.

Author contributions

RA and ZS participated in the dissection of the cadavers and in drafting the manuscript, EA and TS participated in the study design and helped to draft the manuscript. EA participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. ER conceived of the study, participated in the dissection and the study design, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

There is no funding source of any kind.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study—all the participants in the study signed a Form to Bequeath a Body for the Purposes of Scientific and Medical Research.

References

  1. 1.
    Byrd JWT (2012) Operative hip arthroscopy. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olach M, Gerhard P, Giesinger K, Lampert C, Erhardt JB (2019) Clinical and radiological outcome at mean follow-up of 11 years after hip arthroscopy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(1):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3024-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Philippon MJ, Bolia IK, Locks R, Briggs KK (2018) Labral preservation: outcomes following labrum augmentation versus labrum reconstruction. Arthroscopy 34(9):2604–2611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.04.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Philippon MJ, Michalski MP, Campbell KJ, Goldsmith MT, Devitt BM, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF (2014) An anatomical study of the acetabulum with clinical applications to hip arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(20):1673–1682.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.m.01502 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee S, Wuerz TH, Shewman E, McCormick FM, Salata MJ, Philippon MJ, Nho SJ (2015) Labral reconstruction with iliotibial band autografts and semitendinosus allografts improves hip joint contact area and contact pressure: an in vitro analysis. Am J Sports Med 43(1):98–104.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514553089 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Hay CJ, Kuppersmith DA, Dewing CB, Huang MJ (2010) Arthroscopic labral reconstruction in the hip using iliotibial band autograft: technique and early outcomes. Arthroscopy 26(6):750–756.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2009.10.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Domb BG, Gupta A, Stake CE, Hammarstedt JE, Redmond JM (2014) Arthroscopic labral reconstruction of the hip using local capsular autograft. Arthrosc Tech 3(3):e355–e359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2014.02.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsuda DK (2012) Arthroscopic labral reconstruction with gracilis autograft. Arthrosc Tech 1(1):e15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2011.12.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Costa Rocha P, Klingenstein G, Ganz R, Kelly BT, Leunig M (2013) Circumferential reconstruction of severe acetabular labral damage using hamstring allograft: surgical technique and case series. Hip Int 23(Suppl 9):S42–S53.  https://doi.org/10.5301/hip.2013.11662 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharfman ZT, Amar E, Sampson T, Rath E ((2016) ) Arthroscopic labrum reconstruction in the hip using the indirect head of rectus femoris as a local graft: surgical technique. Food Policy 32(4):413–e364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2016.01.008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferro FP, Philippon MJ, Rasmussen MT, Smith SD, LaPrade RF, Wijdicks CA (2015) Tensile properties of the human acetabular labrum and hip labral reconstruction grafts. Am J Sports Med 43(5):1222–1227.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514568086 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amar E, Sampson TG, Sharfman ZT, Caplan A, Rippel N, Atzmon R, Drexler M, Rath E (2016) Acetabular labral reconstruction using the indirect head of the rectus femoris tendon significantly improves patient reported outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4641-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ryan JM, Harris JD, Graham WC, Virk SS, Ellis TJ (2014) Origin of the direct and reflected head of the rectus femoris: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 30(7):796–802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lage LA, Patel JV, Villar RN (1996) The acetabular labral tear: an arthroscopic classification. Arthroscopy 12(3):269–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90057-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCarthy JC, Noble PC, Schuck MR, Wright J, Lee J (2001) The Otto E. Aufranc Award: the role of labral lesions to development of early degenerative hip disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fitzgerald RH Jr (1995) Acetabular labrum tears. Diagnosis and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 311:60–68Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ilizaliturri VM Jr, Byrd JW, Sampson TG, Guanche CA, Philippon MJ, Kelly BT, Dienst M, Mardones R, Shonnard P, Larson CM (2008) A geographic zone method to describe intra-articular pathology in hip arthroscopy: cadaveric study and preliminary report. Arthroscopy 24(5):534–539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hapa O, Bedi A, Gursan O, Akar MS, Guvencer M, Havitcioglu H, Larson CM (2013) Anatomic footprint of the direct head of the rectus femoris origin: cadaveric study and clinical series of hips after arthroscopic anterior inferior iliac spine/subspine decompression. Arthroscopy 29(12):1932–1940.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schuttler KF, Schramm R, El-Zayat BF, Schofer MD, Efe T, Heyse TJ (2018) The effect of surgeon's learning curve: complications and outcome after hip arthroscopy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(10):1415–1421.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2960-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA, Keene JS, Fine JP (2007) Classification and localization of acetabular labral tears. Skelet Radiol 36(5):391–397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0240-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bharam S (2006) Labral tears, extra-articular injuries, and hip arthroscopy in the athlete. Clin Sports Med 25(2):(2):279–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2006.01.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Tai CC, Thomas P (2011) The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture. Managing systems at risk 37(3):207–211.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203142837 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Redmond JM, Gupta A, Hammarstedt JE, Stake CE, Dunne KF, Domb BG (2015) Labral injury: radiographic predictors at the time of hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 31(1):51–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nepple JJ, Goljan P, Briggs KK, Garvey SE, Ryan M, Philippon MJ Hip strength deficits in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears. Arthroscopy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.095 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Assuta Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAffiliated with the Faculty of Health and Science and Ben Gurion UniversityAshdodIsrael
  2. 2.Montefiore Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUSA
  3. 3.Barzilai Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAffiliated with the Faculty of Health and Science and Ben Gurion UniversityAshkelonIsrael
  4. 4.Post Street SurgicalSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Tel Aviv Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAffiliated With the Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Tel Aviv UniversityTel Aviv-YafoIsrael

Personalised recommendations