Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction improves the reliability of tibial pilon fracture classification and preoperative surgical planning
- 73 Downloads
In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of two-dimensional multi-planar computed tomography (2D-MP-CT) scans and three-dimensional surface rendering computed tomography reconstruction (3D-SR-CT) on the inter- and intra-observer reliability of four commonly used classification systems for tibial pilon fractures, and on the reliability and validity of surgical treatment planning for fracture fixation.
Four observers evaluated computed tomography images of 35 cases with pilon fractures according to the classifications of Rüedi and Allgöwer, AO/OTA, Topliss, and Tang, and recommended a surgical treatment plan, including the surgical approach, implant position, and need for bone graft augmentation. Fractures were first evaluated using 2D-MP-CT, followed by 3D-SR-CT. We calculated the Kappa values for the correlation between the fracture classifications, types of surgical approaches, implant positions, and bone graft recommendations by the observers. Furthermore, we assessed the correlation between the treatment plans recommended by the observers and the actual surgical procedure performed.
All classifications showed poor inter-observer reliability and moderate intra-observer reliability with 2D-MP-CT scans. The inter-observer reliability of the Rüedi and Allgöwer, AO/OTA, and Tang classifications improved to moderate, whereas the intra-observer reliability of the AO/OTA classification improved to good with additional 3D-SR-CT. The correlation between the suggested and the actually performed surgical approaches was poor with 2D-MP-CT, but improved to moderate with 3D-SR-CT. The suggested plate positions showed a moderate correlation with the actually performed plating; although the correlation improved significantly, it remained moderate with 3D-SR-CT.
The use of 3D-SR-CT reconstruction can improve the reliability of the Rüedi and Allgöwer, AO/OTA, and Tang classifications. Furthermore, three-dimensional imaging enables a more valid planning of the surgical approach and implant position.
KeywordsPilon Rüedi and allgöwer AO OTA Topliss Tang Reliability
Special thanks to Sarah Reiter for providing the great drawings.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Elsoe R, Larsen P, Petruskevicius J, Kold S (2018) Complex tibial fractures are associated with lower social classes and predict early exit from employment and worse patient-reported QOL: a prospective observational study of 46 complex tibial fractures treated with a ring fixator. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 13(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-017-0301-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Sommer C, Nork SE, Graves M, Blauth M, Rudin M, Stoffel K (2017) Quality of fracture reduction assessed by radiological parameters and its influence on functional results in patients with pilon fractures—a prospective multicentre study. Injury 48(12):2853–2863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ruedi TP, Allgöwer M (1979) The operative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the lower end of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 138:105–110Google Scholar
- 11.Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audige L (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2007: orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21(10 Suppl):S1–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Tang X, Tang PF, Wang MY, Lu DC, Liu MZ, Liu CJ, Liu Y, Sun LZ, Huang LJ, Yu L, Zhao YG (2012) Pilon fractures: a new classification and therapeutic strategies. Chin Med J (Engl) 125(14):2487–2492Google Scholar
- 17.Brunner A, Honigmann P, Treumann T, Babst R (2009) The impact of stereo-visualisation of three-dimensional CT datasets on the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the AO/OTA and Neer classifications in the assessment of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91(6):766–771. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.22109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar