The efficacy of an intramedullary nitinol implant in the correction of claw toe or hammertoe deformities
- 13 Downloads
A multitude of procedures has been described in the literature for the treatment of lesser toe deformities and there is currently no general consensus on the optimal method of fixation. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of an intramedullary nitinol implant for the correction of lesser toe deformities, and to determine if the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint are modified during patient follow-up after correction of the PIP joint.
Materials and methods
A prospective analysis of 36 patients with claw toe or hammertoe who were treated with an intramedullary nitinol implant. Clinical manifestations and angulation of the metatarsophalangeal, proximal and distal interphalangeal (MTP, PIP, DIP) joints were evaluated in radiographic studies preoperatively, at first medical revision post-surgery, and after a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Complications such as non-union rate, implant rupture, and implant infection were also evaluated during follow-up.
All patients were women with an average age of 65.5 (range 47–82) years. The average follow-up time was 2.4 (range 1–5.7) years. Fifty intramedullary nitinol implants were used. The MTP joint extension and PIP joint flexion decreased by 15.9° (95% CI – 19.11 to – 12.63) and 49.4° (95% CI – 55.29 to – 43.52), respectively, at the end of follow-up. Moreover, the DIP joint flexion increased progressively during follow-up (13.7° pre-surgery versus 35.6 in last medical check-up, 95% CI 13.24–30.57). There were four (8%) asymptomatic implant ruptures. The rate of fusion was 98%.
The reduction of the PIP joint using an intramedullary nitinol implant is a good option in lesser toe deformities, with few complications and a high rate of arthrodesis. Moreover, the PIP joint reduction affects both the MTP and DIP joints.
KeywordsHammertoe Claw toe Arthrodesis Smart-Toe® Intramedullary implant Forefoot disorders
We express our gratitude to Ruth Breeze for the language editing of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Ethical review committee statement
This manuscript is accepted by the Regional Ethical Review Board.
- 5.Canale ST (2003) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Mosby, Philadelphia, p 4051Google Scholar
- 6.Marks R (1998) Anatomy and pathophysiology of lesser toe deformities. Foot Ankle Clin 3:199–213Google Scholar
- 12.Taylor RG (1940) An operative procedure for the treatment of hammertoe and claw-toe. J Bone Jt Surg 22:608–609Google Scholar
- 14.Jay RM, Malay DS, Landsman AS, Jennato N, Huish J, Younger M (2016) Dual-component intramedullary implant versus Kirschner wire for proximal interphalangeal joint fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Foot Ankle Surg 55:697–708. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.03.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Reece AT, Stone MH, Young AB (1987) Toe fusion using Kirschner wire. A study of the postoperative infection rate and related problems. J R Coll Surg Edinb 32:158–159Google Scholar
- 33.Münch HJ, Jacobsen SS, Olesen JT, Menné T, Søballe K, Johansen JD et al (2015) The association between metal allergy, total knee arthroplasty and revision: study based on the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 86:378–383. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.999614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar