Does unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have worse outcomes in spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee than in medial compartment osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 29 Downloads
The role of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) remains controversial, even though SONK involves only one compartment of the knee joint. We aimed to compare the survival rate and clinical outcomes of UKA in SONK and medial compartment osteoarthritis (MOA) via a meta-analysis of previous studies.
Materials and methods
MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2018 with keywords related to SONK and knee arthroplasty. Studies were selected with predetermined inclusion criteria: (1) medial UKA as the primary procedure, (2) reporting implant survival or clinical outcomes of osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis, and (3) follow-up period > 1 year. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and standardized mean difference.
The incidence of UKA revision for any reason was significantly higher in SONK than in MOA group (pooled RR = 1.83, p = 0.009). However, the risk of revision due to aseptic loosening was not significantly different between the groups. Moreover, when stratified by the study quality, high-quality studies showed similar risk of overall revision in SONK and MOA (p = 0.71). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in failure between SONK and MOA after cemented mobile and fixed bearing UKA. Results of uncemented UKA were reported only in one study, which showed higher failure of SONK compared to MOA. Clinical outcomes after UKA were similar between SONK and MOA (p = 0.66).
Cemented UKA has similar survival and clinical outcomes in SONK and MOA. Prospective studies designed specifically to compare the UKA outcomes in SONK and MOA are necessary.
KeywordsKnee Osteoarthritis Arthroplasty Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Unicondylar knee arthroplasty Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee
This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2017M3A9D8063538).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 4.Myers TG, Cui Q, Kuskowski M, Mihalko WM, Saleh KJ (2006) Outcomes of total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for secondary and spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:76–82Google Scholar
- 10.Heller S, Fenichel I, Salai M, Luria T, Velkes S (2009) The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis for the treatment of medial compartment knee disease: 2 to 5 year follow-up. Isr Med Assoc J 11:266–268Google Scholar
- 16.Bruni D, Iacono F, Russo A, Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bignozzi S, Bragonzoni L, Marcacci M (2010) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:710–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Zhang Q, Guo W, Liu Z, Cheng L, Yue D, Zhang N (2015) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in treatment of osteonecrosis versus osteoarthritis: a matched-pair comparison. Acta Orthop Belg 81:333–339Google Scholar
- 19.Zermatten P, Munzinger U (2012) The Oxford II medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an independent 10-year survival study. Acta Orthop Belg 78:203–209Google Scholar
- 21.Ma T, Tu Y, Xue H, Wen T, Mei J (2017) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for spontaneous osteonecrosis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 25:1–5Google Scholar
- 22.Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM (2011) Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res 63:S208–S228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Siman H, Kamath AF, Carrillo N, Harmsen WS, Pagnano MW, Sierra RJ (2017) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthritis in patients older than 75 years: comparable reoperation, revision, and complication rates. J Arthroplasty 32:1792–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Koskinen E, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2008) Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 79:499–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Parratte S, Argenson JNA, Dumas J, Aubaniac JM (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for avascular osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Rel Res 464:37–42Google Scholar
- 33.Antoniadis A, Dimitriou D, Canciani JP, Helmy N (2018) A novel preoperative scoring system for the indication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, as predictor of clinical outcome and satisfaction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1–8Google Scholar
- 34.Mears SC, McCarthy EF, Jones LC, Hungerford DS, Mont MA (2009) Characterization and pathological characteristics of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Iowa Orthop J 29:38–42Google Scholar