Four questions to identify patients with ASA III or higher
- 68 Downloads
Increased age, obesity, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status class III and IV have been reported as predictors for mortality and perioperative complications. High-volume institutions rely on central referral services as first contact point for patients. The current study reports on a simple four-step questionnaire to identify patients with ASA-physical status class III and IV to improve referral processes and optimize perioperative work ups.
Materials and methods
Seven hundred and seventy-five patients who called the physician referral service (PRS) at the author’s institution and subsequently underwent surgery were enrolled in this study. The answers to the initial PRS questionnaire were analyzed. The study cohort consisted of 414 women (53.4%) and 361 men (46.6%) with an average age of 61.4 years (range 44–90 years) at the time of surgery.
Binary logistic regression revealed hypertension, diabetes mellitus (using medication), using blood thinner (other than Aspirin) and a number of 4–9 prescribed medication, respectively, as predictors for ASA III and IV. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified a sensitivity of 82.4%, a specificity of 82.9%, and an accuracy of 82.8%, when two of these four questions are answered “yes”. The area under the curve for this analysis was 0.876 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.845–0.908]. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.8 (95% CI 4.0–5.8) and 0.2 (95% CI 0.1–0.3), respectively.
This study revealed a simple four-step questionnaire to identify patients with ASA III or IV before a medical appointment. This helps to balance referrals between multiple providers in high-volume medical groups.
KeywordsTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) ASA-physical status classification Questionnaire Prediction of perioperative risk
No external funding was received for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. Boettner has received royalties by Smith and Nephew and Orthodevelopment. Dr. Boettner has also received compensation by Smith and Nephew, Orthodevelopment, and DePuy. All other authors have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 4.Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA (2003) Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-a(1):27–32Google Scholar
- 5.Parvizi J, Johnson BG, Rowland C, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG (2001) Thirty-day mortality after elective total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83-a(10):1524–1528Google Scholar
- 7.Feng B, Lin J, Jin J, Qian WW, Wang W, Weng XS (2017) Thirty-day postoperative complications following primary total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of incidence and risk factors at a single center in China. Chin Med J 130(21):2551–2556. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.213071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Dripps RD (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111Google Scholar
- 14.Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Hooper NM, Frampton C (2012) The relationship between the American Society Of Anesthesiologists physical rating and outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of theNew Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(12):1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.01681 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Garland A, Rolfson O, Garellick G, Karrholm J, Hailer NP (2015) Early postoperative mortality after simultaneous or staged bilateral primary total hip arthroplasty: an observational register study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0535-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Mak PH, Campbell RC, Irwin MG (2002) The ASA physical status classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of anesthesiologists. Anaesth Intensive Care 30(5):633–640Google Scholar