Suboptimal patellofemoral alignment is associated with poor clinical outcome scores after primary total knee arthroplasty
- 63 Downloads
Proper patellofemoral alignment is an important goal in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Acceptable patellar alignment is defined as patellar tilt less than or equal to 5° and patellar displacement less than or equal to 5 mm. Previous studies reported an incidence of post-operative patellar malalignment in TKA from 7 to 35%. However, correlation between patellar malalignment and clinical outcome after TKA remains unclear. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of patellar tilt and displacement on the clinical outcome of TKA.
A retrospective review of 138 primary TKAs with a minimum of 2 year follow-up is reported. Pre-operative and post-operative mechanical axis, patellar tilting angle and patellar displacement were measured. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the knee functional scores including the Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at final follow-up.
Forty-two (30%) primary TKAs had suboptimal patellofemoral alignment with a patellar tilt angle greater than 5° or lateral patellar displacement of more than 5 mm. There was no statistical difference in pre-operative mechanical axis, pre-operative patellar tilt angle, or pre-operative lateral patellar displacement between the primary TKAs with proper patellofemoral alignment and those with suboptimal alignment. Patients with post-operative patellar tilt or displacement had clinically significant reductions in KSS, KOOS, and WOMAC when compared with patients without post-operative patellar tilt or displacement. The odds of having a fair or poor post-operative result, an odds ratio of 3.4 (95% CI 1.6–7.2) for KSS, 6.4 (95% CI 2.9–14.2) for KOOS, and 5.9 (95% CI 2.6–13.5) for WOMAC, were associated with suboptimal patellofemoral alignment.
Establishing proper patellofemoral alignment remains an essential goal of primary TKA. There is a strong association between suboptimal post-operative patellofemoral alignment and poor clinical outcome scores after primary TKA.
KeywordsPatellofemoral alignment Total knee arthroplasty Patellar tilting Patellar displacement
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethics committee approvals were obtained.
- 3.Rand JA (2004) Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. JBJS-A 2062Google Scholar
- 4.Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ et al (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144Google Scholar
- 5.Lakstein D, ZarrabianM, Kosashvili Y et al (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty for component malrotation is highly beneficial: a case control study. J Arthroplasty 1047Google Scholar
- 11.Grelsamer RP, Bazos AN, Proctor CS (1993) Radiographic analysis of patellar tilt. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(5):822–824Google Scholar
- 12.Bindelglass DF, Cohen JL, Dorr LD (1993) Patellar tilt and subluxation in total knee arthroplasty: relationship to pain, fixation, and design. Clin Orthop 286:103 (J Arthroplasty 1 I:507, 1996)Google Scholar
- 14.Pongcharoen B, Yakampor T, Charoencholvanish K (2013) Patellar tracking and anterior knee pain are similar after medial parapatellar and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(5):1654–1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2778-5 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Merchant AC, Mercer RL, Jacobsen RH, Cool CR (1974) Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56-A:139 l–6Google Scholar
- 17.Gomes G, Scharf SC, Meltzer LP, Scott WN (1988) Patellar prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty: a roentgenographic study. Clin Orthop 236:72Google Scholar
- 27.Laurin CA, Dussault R, Levesque HP (1979) The tangential X-ray investigation of the patellofemoral joint: X-ray technique, diagnostic criteria and their interpretation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144:16–26Google Scholar