Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 139, Issue 1, pp 35–41 | Cite as

Management of elderly hip fractures by an orthopaedic trauma surgeon reduces surgical delays but does not improve outcomes compared to non-trauma surgeons

  • Wei Yuan
  • Ernest Beng Kee KwekEmail author
Trauma Surgery



Recent literature on hip fractures has focussed on the optimal environment for best outcomes. One factor that has not been studied is the managing surgeon’s training background. Our study aims to examine if hip fracture patients managed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons have better outcomes compared to non-trauma trained general orthopaedic surgeons.


This is a retrospective study performed at a tertiary hospital with an established orthogeriatric co-managed hip fracture care pathway. All surgically treated elderly hip fracture patients over a period of 2 years were included and divided into 2 groups based on the managing surgeon: trauma and non-trauma. Patient characteristics, fracture and surgery information, post-operative complications, 1 year mortality and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores were collected and compared.


871 patients were included. 32.1% (N = 280) were managed by trauma surgeons and 67.9% (N = 591) by non-trauma surgeons. There was no significant difference in the MBI scores pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 months post-operatively between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. However, patients managed by trauma surgeons had significantly shorter time to surgery (p = 0.028) and higher proportion of surgeries performed within 48 h (p = 0.039). Trauma surgeons also took a shorter time to fix intertrochanteric fractures (p = 0.000).


This study did not find any difference in the functional outcomes of hip fracture patients managed by trauma surgeons or non-trauma surgeons. However, trauma surgeons had faster times to surgery and shorter surgical times when fixing intertrochanteric fractures.


Hip fractures Managing surgeon Trauma surgeon Non-trauma surgeon Outcomes 



There is no funding source.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.


  1. 1.
    Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ III (2009) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2(6):285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB (2003) Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(3):364–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saltzherr TP, Borgahns HJ, Bakker RH, Go PM (2006) Proximal femur fractures in the elderly in The Netherlands during the period 1991–2004: incidence, mortality, length of hospital stay and an estimate of the care capacity needed in the future. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 150(47):2599–2604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B (1989) Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 42(8):703–709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Browne JA, Pietrobon R, Olson SA (2009) Hip fracture outcomes: does surgeon or hospital volume really matter? J Trauma 66(3):809–814CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shah SN, Wainess RM, Karunakar MA (2005) Hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in the elderly surgeon and hospital volume-related outcomes. J Arthroplasty 20(4):503–508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hughes RG, Garnick DW, Luft HS, McPhee SJ, Hunt SS (1988) Hospital volume and patient outcomes. The case of hip fracture patients. Med Care 26(11):1057–1067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ames J, Lurie JD, Tomek IM, Zhou W, Koval KJ (2010) Does surgeon volume for total hip arthroplasty affect outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39(8):E84–E89Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forte ML, Virnig BA, Swiontkowski MF, Bhandari M, Feldman R, Eberly LE, Kane RL (2010) Ninety-day mortality after intertrochanteric hip fracture: does provider volume matter? J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(4):799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bottle A, Aylin P (2006) Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study. BMJ 332(7547):947–951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M (2011) Surgery for hip fractures: does surgical delay affect outcomes? Indian J Orthop 45(1):27–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weller I, Wai EK, Jaglal S, Kreder HJ (2005) The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87(3):361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Colais P, Di Martino M, Fusco D, Perucci CA, Davoli M (2015) The effect of early surgery after hip fracture on 1-year mortality. BMC Geriatrv 15:141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nyholm AM, Gromov K, Palm H, Brix M, Kallemose T, Troelsen A, Danish Fracture Database Collaborators (2015) Time to surgery is associated with thirty-day and ninety-day mortality after proximal femoral fracture: a retrospective observational study on prospectively collected data from the danish fracture database collaborators. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(16):1333–1339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Novack V, Jotkowitz A, Etzion O, Porath A (2007) Does delay in surgery after hip fracture lead to worse outcomes? A multicenter survey. Int J Qual Health Care 19(3):170–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peleg K, Rozenfeld M, Radomislensky I, Novikov I, Freedman LS, Israeli A (2014) Policy encouraging earlier hip fracture surgery can decrease the long-term mortality of elderly patients. Injury 45(7):1085–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anthony CA, Duchman KR, Bedard NA, Gholson JJ, Gao Y, Pugely AJ, Callaghan JJ (2017) Hip fractures: appropriate timing to operative intervention. J Arthroplasty 32(11):3314–3318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Orosz GM, Magaziner J, Hannan EL, Morrison RS, Koval K, Gilbert M, McLaughlin M, Halm EA, Wang JJ, Litke A, Silberzweig SB, Siu AL (2004) Association of timing of surgery for hip fracture and patient outcomes. JAMA 291(14):1738–1743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shiga T, Wajima Z, Ohe Y (2008) Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Can J Anaesth 55(3):146–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, Ricci C, Virgili G, Salanti G, Germagnoli L, Liberati A, Banfi G (2012) Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hours have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PLoS One 7(10):e46175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chiasson PM, Roy PD, Mitchell MJ, Chiasson AM, Alexander DI (1997) Hip fracture surgery in Nova Scotia: a comparison of treatment provided by “generalist” general surgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Can J Surg 40(5):383–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guerado E, Cano JR, Cruz E, Bertrand ML, Hirschfeld M, Benitez-Parejo N (2015) Should hip fractures be operated upon only by specialist hip unit surgeons in order to lower rates of surgical site infection? Int Orthop 39(1):105–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Treskes K, Voeten SC, Tol MC, Zuidema WP, Vermeulen J, Goslings JC, Schep NW et al (2017) Trauma surgery by general surgeons: still an option for proximal femoral fractures? Injury 48(2):339–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Murray DJ, Foley G, Chougle A (2014) Current practice in the treatment of AO type 31-A2 hip fractures: does sub-specialty and experience of surgeon determine type of fixation? Surgeon 12(4):206–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryTan Tock Seng HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations