Preliminary results of a novel spacer technique in the management of septic revision hip arthroplasty
- 53 Downloads
Mechanical failure due to dislocation, fracture and acetabular wear is a major complication associated with the use of spacers in the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We have developed a novel custom-made spacer in the setting of two-stage septic revision hip arthroplasty and present the preliminary results of our technique.
Materials and methods
Between May 2015 and November 2017, 30 patients underwent hip revision using the ENDO spacer technique in the setting of a two-stage septic exchange arthroplasty. The technique involves the dual mobility liner and the downsized stainless cemented straight stem in combination with antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement. The primary outcome measure was the overall spacer complication rate, particularly spacer dislocation. Furthermore, functional outcome using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) before spacer implantation and prior re-implantation was evaluated.
The mean age of the patients was 69.8 years (range from 45 to 85; SD = 9.9 years). No microorganisms were preoperatively found in 23 (76.7%) cases. Successful re-implantation was performed in all patients after a mean spacer duration time of 53.6 days (range 14–288 days; SD = 48.2). Spacer-related complications occurred in only two patients (6.7%). The HHS significantly improved from 34.0 (range 3–62; SD = 15.1) to 48.1 (range 11–73; SD = 15.7) (p = 0.0008).
The ENDO spacer surgical technique is a feasible option in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), with a low dislocation rate. Furthermore, it allows early mobilization with the possibility of full-weight bearing.
KeywordsProsthetic joint infection Two-stage septic exchange (revision) Antibiotic spacer Dislocation rate Dual mobility cup ENDO spacer
There is no funding source.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript. Outside the manuscript, one or more of the authors of this paper have disclosed following disclosures: Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany; Zimmer; Ceramtec and Heraeus.
This study was performed after obtaining approval from the institutional review board. The PV number is “PV5443”.
- 3.Citak M, Argenson JN, Masri B, Kendoff D, Springer B, Alt V, Baldini A, Cui Q, Deirmengian GK, del Sel H, Harrer MF, Israelite C, Jahoda D, Jutte PC, Levicoff E, Meani E, Motta F, Pena OR, Ranawat AS, Safir O, Squire MW, Taunton MJ, Vogely C, Wellman SS (2014) Spacers J Orthop Res 32(Suppl 1):S120–S129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22555 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Uchiyama K, Takahira N, Fukushima K, Moriya M, Yamamoto T, Minegishi Y, Sakai R, Itoman M, Takaso M (2013) Two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic infections using antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers of various types and materials. Sci World J 2013:147248. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/147248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Citak M, Masri BA, Springer B, Argenson JN, Kendoff DO (2015) Are preformed articulating spacers superior to surgeon-made articulating spacers in the treatment of PJI in THA? A literature review. Open Orthop J 9:255–261. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010255 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Faschingbauer M, Reichel H, Bieger R, Kappe T (2015) Mechanical complications with one hundred and thirty eight (antibiotic-laden) cement spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39(5):989–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2636-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hoell S, Moeller A, Gosheger G, Hardes J, Dieckmann R, Schulz D (2016) Two-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections: what is the value of cultures and white cell count in synovial fluid and CRP in serum before second stage reimplantation? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(4):447–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2404-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Akgun D, Perka C, Trampuz A, Renz N (2018) Outcome of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections caused by pathogens resistant to biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a prospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(5):635–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2886-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Murgier J, Laffosse JM, Cailliez J, Cavaignac E, Murgier P, Bayle-Iniguez X, Chiron P, Bonnevialle P (2016) Is the prognosis the same for periprosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus versus coagulase-negative staphylococci? A retrospective study of 101 patients with 2-year minimum follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(10):1357–1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2533-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Biring GS, Kostamo T, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2009) Two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip for infection using an interim articulated prostalac hip spacer: a 10- to 15-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91(11):1431–1437. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B11.22026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Dairaku K, Takagi M, Kawaji H, Sasaki K, Ishii M, Ogino T (2009) Antibiotics-impregnated cement spacers in the first step of two-stage revision for infected totally replaced hip joints: report of ten trial cases. J Orthop Sci 14(6):704–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1406-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Tsung JD, Rohrsheim JA, Whitehouse SL, Wilson MJ, Howell JR (2014) Management of periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty using a custom made articulating spacer (CUMARS); the exeter experience. J Arthroplast 29(9):1813–1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Guyen O, Chen QS, Bejui-Hugues J, Berry DJ, An KN (2007) Unconstrained tripolar hip implants: effect on hip stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238796.59596.1f CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lass R, Giurea A, Kubista B, Hirschl AM, Graninger W, Presterl E, Windhager R, Holinka J (2014) Bacterial adherence to different components of total hip prosthesis in patients with prosthetic joint infection. Int Orthop 38(8):1597–1602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2358-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Gibon E, Cordova LA, Lu L, Lin TH, Yao Z, Hamadouche M, Goodman SB (2016) The biological response to orthopedic implants for joint replacement. II: polyethylene, ceramics, PMMA, and the foreign body reaction. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33676 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Vielgut I, Sadoghi P, Wolf M, Holzer L, Leithner A, Schwantzer G, Poolman R, Frankl B, Glehr M (2015) Two-stage revision of prosthetic hip joint infections using antibiotic-loaded cement spacers: when is the best time to perform the second stage? Int Orthop 39(9):1731–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2751-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar