Skip to main content

Analyzing microglial phenotypes across neuropathologies: a practical guide

Abstract

As extremely sensitive immune cells, microglia act as versatile watchdogs of the central nervous system (CNS) that tightly control tissue homeostasis. Therefore, microglial activation is an early and easily detectable hallmark of virtually all neuropsychiatric, neuro-oncological, neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases. The recent introduction of novel high-throughput technologies and several single-cell methodologies as well as advances in epigenetic analyses helped to identify new microglia expression profiles, enhancer-landscapes and local signaling cues that defined diverse previously unappreciated microglia states in the healthy and diseased CNS. Here, we give an overview on the recent developments in the field of microglia biology and provide a practical guide to analyze disease-associated microglia phenotypes in both the murine and human CNS, on several morphological and molecular levels. Finally, technical limitations, potential pitfalls and data misinterpretations are discussed as well.

Introduction into the origin and function of microglia

More than 100 years ago, a dispute arose among two famous Spanish neuroscientists. Santiago Ramón y Cajal had predicted a third element (respectively, cell type) besides neurons and astrocytes [64]. Over time, it became evident that the third element comprised microglia and oligodendroglia. Since his tutor’s hypothesis lacked further specifications concerning features, morphology and functions of the third element, it was Pío del Río Hortega who first characterized microglia [50]. The controversy about the origin of the newly discovered cell type could not be settled at that time. For many decades after the dispute, little attention was paid to microglia cells. It is therefore not surprising that it took almost a century to finally clarify the origin of microglia cells. During primitive hematopoiesis in mice, c-kit+ stem cells in the extraembryonic yolk sac mature into CD45+ c-kit Cx3cr1+ macrophages [28]. Those cells invade the developing brain via the primitive bloodstream and give rise to definitive microglia [55]. Similar to circulating myeloid cells and tissue macrophages in the periphery, microglia have dual functions during non-inflammatory and inflammatory conditions [10]. In a non-inflammatory, healthy central nervous system (CNS), microglia were formerly believed to be quiescent and resting. On the contrary, microglial have motile processes and protrusions. They are constantly moving and thereby actively surveying their environment. During postnatal development, microglia are involved in axonal guidance and synaptic pruning, the physiological process in which abundant synapses are eliminated [49]. Therefore, the neuronal circuit maturation heavily relies on microglial involvement. Another function of microglia is to phagocyte any apoptotic debris, reducing proinflammatory cytokine secretion and minimizing tissue injury [34]. As a result, their exaggerated activation may also cause damage to the CNS [52].

Given that microglia can be both beneficial and detrimental to brain homeostasis and brain health, it has been shown that microglia are involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) [36], Alzheimer's disease [41, 75], Parkinson's disease [77], autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [78] and even COVID-19 encephalitis recently [53, 54, 62]. Therefore, studying the underlying mechanisms of microglial activity potentially helps to better understand many neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders and may provide novel therapeutic approaches.

In addition, studying the microglial phenotype can also be interesting for researchers outside of the microglial community. As guardians of the brain, the cells rapidly react to any changes in brain homeostasis. In the event of brain pathologies, the microglial phenotype is certainly altered. Therefore, analyzing microglia can be a sensitive tool to check for CNS involvement in any given patient specimen or mouse model.

Within the past years, the microglia field and its technical possibilities have been evolving enormously. In this overview, we will summarize these developments and provide an easy point-by-point guide for assessing different microglial phenotypes.

Murine versus human microglial cells: similarities and dissimilarities

Microglia have previously been studied in mammals including humans and rodents, but also in amphibians, reptiles, birds and annelids [16]. In all animals, microglia present themselves as CNS-resident cells with a ramified shape. In some species, microglia have more protrusions or a higher volume. Moreover, differences in microglia density are observed. Further examination of the cell transcriptome revealed a common microglial core gene expression pattern that is conserved across evolution. This core signature includes genes involved in microglia development (e.g. Csf1r, Spi1, Irf8), lysosomal markers (e.g. Ctsb) or genes that have previously been identified as “microglia-specific” since they are barely expressed in other (infiltrating) immune cells (e.g. Tmem119, CD81, Sall1, Hexb and P2ry12). In addition, some genes such as Msr1 are predominantly expressed in primates. In contrast, the expression in rodents including mice and rats is extremely low. Msr1 encodes for macrophage scavenger receptor 1 that is involved in amyloid beta (Aβ) processing. The gene is thought to be a risk locus for Alzheimer’s disease, as shown in genome-wide association studies. Microglia in the brains of rodents which are housed under specific-pathogen-free laboratory conditions show a stable homeostatic phenotype. In contrast, some microglial activation markers may be observed in the normal white matter of patients, devoid of any known neurological disease [76]. As an example, the major molecules involved in oxygen radical production, such as those of the NOX2 complex are already expressed in the normal brain and highly up-regulated in inflammatory or neurodegenerative diseases [76, 79], while in rodents their expression is restricted to a very small subset of microglia even under inflammatory conditions [40]. Another major difference is the profound iron loading of microglia in the aging human brain [23], which is associated with microglia senescence [68] and is virtually absent in the rodent brain. These examples highlight the limitations of animal models when examining microglia in the context of human diseases because they may not completely reflect the human disease pathogenesis.

Non-invasive imaging techniques for microglia analyses

Physicians have a great interest in visualizing the activation states of microglia non-invasively in the human brain. In particular, positron emission tomography using microglia-specific radiotracers could help to clarify uncertain diagnoses or monitor the course of a disease such as multiple sclerosis.

Many chemical compounds targeting e.g. TSPO [74], P2X7 [30], CB2 receptor [44], COX-2 or CSF1R [24] have been developed in the past decades. The radiotracers all face similar problems. One major issue is the binding specificity of the compounds in vivo. On the one hand, polymorphisms in the target gene may determine the binding affinity [74]. On the other hand, unspecific binding potentially reduces the diagnostic power of the analysis. Moreover, the radiotracers’ targets are not necessarily specific for microglia cells. For instance, it has been shown that TSPO is also expressed by other cell types such as astrocytes or glial progenitor cells and thus cannot be seen as a microglia-specific radiotracer target. Moreover, a recent study could show that the findings from animal models do not always translate to the clinical context in humans [47]. Despite the fact that existing radiotracers need further improvement, the approach holds great promise for patients with (suspected) CNS pathologies. Even more, they allow to monitor disease activity longitudinally in chronic diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, and could thus be used as a paraclinical tool to monitor the effect of neuroprotective treatments [66, 69].

Classical staining techniques for microglial cells

The haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain is the most widely applied technique for routine histopathological examination of human tissue samples (Figs. 1, 2). Although the cytoplasm of microglia is hardly visible in H&E-stained specimens, microglial nuclei can be identified by their characteristic shape [15]. They are typically dark and relatively small in size. The partially occurring elongated nuclear shape had been termed “bean-shaped”, “cigar-shaped” or “comma-shaped” in the literature [14, 15]. Moreover, the contour of microglial nuclei partially appears irregular [15]. In the beginning of the twentieth century, different silver impregnation methods enabled Santiago Ramón y Cajal and his student Pío del Río Hortega to describe and characterize microglia.

Fig. 1
figure1

The workflow of tissue processing for the analysis of microglial cells using conventional and novel state-of-the-art technologies is depicted. The technical spectrum for the characterization of microglia cells and the necessary tissue pretreatment are shown

Fig. 2
figure2

Visualization of microglia by using non-antibody-dependent staining techniques. a Different cell types including microglia can be identified in a Haematoxylin & Eosin section (H&E) of a healthy human cortex. Microglial nuclei (M) are small and dark, partially appear irregular and sometimes elongated with a “cigar-like” or “comma-like” shape. Perivascular macrophages (P) are located along blood vessels, in which endothelial cells (E) can be identified by their elongated nuclei. Arrows also point towards neurons (N), oligodendrocytes (O) and astrocytes (A). Scale bars: 50 µm and 20 µm (insert). b Lectins stain ramified microglia within the cortex of a mouse brain (asterisk). Cerebral vessels are stained as well (upper right). The staining with lectin (obtained from Lycopersicon Esculentum) is shown in green, DAPI in blue. Scale bar: 20 µm. c An electron microscopy image of a murine spinal cord is depicted. Microglia are typically small in size, partly have a “bean-shaped” nuclei (yellow asterisks) and only show little cytoplasm. Scale bars: 5 µm and 2 µm (insert)

Since the late 1950s, electron microscopy (EM) was used to determine the ultrastructure of microglia [42, 59, 60]. In EM, microglia appear rather small in size and may have a bent, “bean-shaped” nuclei [59]. The cytoplasm typically appears sparse and electron-dense [59] and frequently contains polymorphic electron-dense inclusions. Additional labelling, e.g. by gold-coupled antibodies, can help to identify the cells. Later, it has been shown that lectins, such as isolectin B4, that can be obtained from seeds of the African plant Griffonia simplicifolia or the tomato plant Lycopersicon esculentum, can be used for staining microglia cells [57, 67].

Nowadays, silver impregnations and lectins are hardly used anymore. They have almost completely been replaced by a more specific method, namely immunohistochemistry (Supplementary Fig. 1). Immunohistochemical reactions against the ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1) are routinely used to get a first impression of the microglia in a tissue sample. The cytoplasmic immunoreactivity nicely visualizes the cell shape and all processes. As described below, the morphology of the cell can provide insights about the activation status. Immunohistochemical reactions against human leukocyte antigen DR (HLA-DR) are commonly used in addition. Immunohistochemistry against macrosialin (CD68) reveals the degree of lysosomal activity. Since virtually all CNS pathologies involve microglia activation, the microglial phenotype alone can reveal whether a tissue sample must be considered pathological or not. Specifically, a tissue specimen with an entirely normal, homeostatic microglial phenotype excludes pathological CNS processes with almost complete certainty. Conversely, microglial alterations indicate CNS pathologies within the examined sample or even in the in situ CNS neighborhood. While this is obvious for young rodents housed under specific-pathogen-free conditions, the interpretation of microglial activation in the human brain can be more challenging. Non-neurological comorbidities and ongoing systemic therapies need to be taken into consideration.

Microglia phenotypes in health and disease

Using light microscopy, chromogenic DAB-based immunohistochemistry against Iba1 is a widely established method to study the morphological characteristics of microglial cells in both murine and human tissue specimens. We recommend the following standardized approach to assess microglial changes in CNS during homeostasis and perturbance (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 3
figure3

Immunohistochemistry-based assessment of microglia phenotypes across neuropathologies. Using Iba1 immunohistochemistry (brown), the following six-step standardized sequence is recommended for the analysis of microglia cells. In short, microglia cells and CNS-associated macrophages first need to be identified by their spatial distribution. Secondly, the cell density should be evaluated. The cell shape is of particular importance when analyzing the microglial phenotype. An uneven, irregular distribution pattern and microglia cell territories that are potentially overlapping might point towards local pathological processes within a tissue section. Next, the examiner should look for distinct microglia phenotypes, e.g. dividing cells or cells that underwent foam cell transformation. Lastly, a potential interaction with other cell types should be explored. Combined immunohistochemical reactions with two different markers are indicated. Counterstaining with haematoxylin (blue)

Step 1: Identification of myeloid cells within the CNS

Iba1 is a reliable cytoplasmic microglial marker with a strong signal, labelling both cell bodies and processes (Fig. 3, Step 1, Supplementary Fig. 2a). Nevertheless, there is a major pitfall in using this marker, since Iba1 does not exclusively label microglia cells. It also marks other cell types such as perivascular or meningeal macrophages or even infiltrating myeloid cells such as monocytes. Due to their location within the meninges, meningeal macrophages can easily be identified. Distinguishing perivascular macrophages from microglia can be more challenging. Perivascular macrophages typically present with an elongated shape and unlike microglia without many processes. By nature, identifying vessels helps to find perivascular macrophages. With haematoxylin as counterstaining, vessels may show a lumen. Only if the vessel is cut transversally, a roundish shape might be visible. Longitudinally cut vessels show series of elongated nuclei and potentially an elongated lumen. In cortical biopsies, the course of the vessels is typically perpendicular to the cortical tissue surface, which can help to identify vessels and subsequently perivascular macrophages. After excluding meningeal and perivascular macrophages, the remaining parenchymal Iba1-labelled cells with processes are microglia. Notably, infiltrating monocytes would also be Iba1-positive. Although the cell shape may help to distinguish them from microglia to some extent, infiltrated monocytes may become ramified in the brain extracellular space [31].

Step 2: Cell density

Microgliosis is defined as an elevated number of microglia cells (Fig. 3, Step 2). For better comparison, only cells with a visible soma/nucleus should be taken into account. Fine processes of microglial cells whose somata are not visible and most likely located in the consecutive tissue section should not be counted. A microgliosis is always a sign of ongoing pathology that is caused by microglial cell proliferation and/or myeloid cell infiltration. Unless a developing brain with a physiological microgliosis is examined, the observation of higher numbers of microglia cells alone proves that the tissue is not completely homeostatic or healthy. The microgliosis can either be a sign for an active microglia-driven process or alternatively occur in response to any neighboring pathological events. Therefore, any microgliosis in a patient specimen requires further examination.

Of note, the staining procedure including the selection of antibody clone, thickness of the section and the incubation times may affect the number of cells labelled. In mice, the exact hygiene status of an animal facility highly influences the number of cells observed. Consequently, the comparison with age-matched controls is essential.

Step 3: Cell shape

As brain-resident macrophages, microglia usually have a ramified, spider-like shape. In the homeostatic CNS, microglia mostly present with a small soma and multiple processes (Fig. 3, Step 3). The processes are thin, also at the junction with the cell body. There are numerous ramifications. The thickness of the arms hardly changes in the course, making them look like a line. Upon activation, microglia rapidly change their morphology within a few minutes. Typically, the microglial somata appear bigger and the arms are thicker. Occasionally, the processes taper to a point. In this case, they have a bigger diameter at the soma and a smaller diameter in the periphery. This phenotype has previously been described as “thorny” or “spiky”. The processes can be shorter with less ramifications (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Thus, the whole cell may occupy a smaller area. Altogether, activated microglia cells look less delicate and more condensed. Light microscopy is very well suited for the assessment of the microglial morphology. Quantifiable morphometrical data (e.g. dendrite length, number of segments, number of branch points, cell volume) can be obtained by fluorescent immunohistochemistry, confocal microscopy and 3D reconstruction [11].

During homeostasis, microglia are considered to be long-lived in both mouse and man. They show only a small self-renewal rate through proliferation in the adult at a rate of 0.5% [1, 71]. There is no infiltration of circulating immune cells into the healthy CNS parenchyma. In contrast, myeloid cells cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and enter the CNS together with lymphocytes under neuroinflammatory conditions (e.g. in patients with active multiple sclerosis). Like parenchymal microglia, infiltrating parenchymal myeloid cells such as monocytes are also Iba1-positive. After infiltration into the brain parenchyma, bone marrow-derived macrophages initially retain their round shape, which allows them to be identified at this stage. Over time, the cells acquire a phenotype highly resembling brain-resident microglia. This phenotype includes transcriptional and morphological features. Of note, after ablation of microglia in mice, the microglial compartment is reconstituted by proliferation of CNS-resident cells and independent from bone-marrow derived precursors [4].

Iba1-positive cells with a round shape may point towards an infiltration of hematopoietic cells. Immunohistochemistry with markers for leucocytes, for example CD3 for T cells and CD20/B220 for B cells, might be useful to investigate this in more detail. However, fully activated microglia may also appear roundish and foamy and can no longer be distinguished from infiltrating Iba1+ monocytes.

Step 4: Distribution pattern

The distribution pattern of microglia should be carefully examined considering several aspects. First, are the microglial features observed homogenous in the whole tissue section? Occasionally, the microglial phenotype differs regionally within the same section. For instance, white matter microglia may present with more activated features than grey matter microglia [61] (Fig. 3, step 4). Perivascular microglia accumulation might point towards a vascular pathology.

Second, do the individual microglia respect each other’s territory? In a physiological brain, the distance between a microglial cell and the surrounding microglia is comparatively constant; spots with two or more microglia cells accumulating are fairly rare (Fig. 3, step 4, upper left). Vice versa, finding this pattern commonly points towards pathological processes (Supplementary Fig. 2e). Iba1-positive structures with many microglia cells accumulating and indistinguishable cell borders are called microglia nodules. They are commonly found in chronic inflammatory conditions, including viral infections or putative autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis [65]. In particular, microglia nodules have been described in the context of HIV and COVID-19 encephalopathy [38, 62].

Step 5: Distinct microglial phenotypes

Next, the researcher should look for rare but pretty distinct microglial phenotypes. Among these are the microglial nodules discussed earlier [35, 65] (Fig. 3, step 5). An increased Iba1+ cell density (see “Step 2: cell density”) can primarily result from higher numbers of invading blood-borne cells or an increase in self-renewal by proliferation. In the latter instance, it may be possible to detect microglia cells that are in the process of division [13]. The most reliable evidence is certainly the presence of mitotic figures within microglia cells. However, due to the short window within the cell cycle, mitotic figures can only be detected rarely. For this reason, it can be useful to combine Iba1 immunohistochemistry with the proliferation marker Ki-67 [18]. Even beyond the slightly longer time window of Ki-67 positivity, there may be signs of previous cell divisions. Thus, two closely located microglia cells with a connecting cytoplasmic bridge strongly suggests that the cells arose from a single cell that has been dividing.

Small bulgings on thin microglia processes, named knot-like structures, were demonstrated in brain samples from patients with hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids (HDLS) [70]. The disease is characterized by various neurological symptoms including dementia. It is caused by different mutations in the CSF1R gene. Since the gene is predominantly expressed in microglia in the brain, the disease is considered a “primary microgliopathy” [55, 56].

Foam cells are transformed macrophages whose cytoplasm appears foamy and bubbly because of previously phagocytosed material, primarily lipids [33]. In the periphery, the formation of foam cells has been studied well in the context of atherosclerosis [33]. Foam cells can also be found within the CNS (Supplementary Fig. 2 h). They are typically found in multiple sclerosis lesions [21, 36]. In this case, the foam cells may also contain myelin [21]. The degradation of the myelin components follows a predictable temporal sequence. Thus, the chemical profile of the myelin degradation products can be used as a precise marker for the time dependent evolution of a lesion [3]. As a sign of an active debris clearance, foam cells are occasionally observed in close proximity to brain tumors or CNS abscesses.

Under certain neurodegenerative conditions in the human brain and in inactive lesions of multiple sclerosis the global number (density) of microglia is reduced. This appears to be a consequence of microglia senescence during active disease [23, 68]. Microglia senescence is characterized by clumping and loss of cell processes finally resulting in cell death by apoptosis. Senescent microglia can be visualized by immunohistochemical staining for ferritin, since it is associated with microglia iron load [23]. Senescent microglia may be a result of oxidative injury and may be one of the reasons for microglia dysfunction in the cortex of patients with Alzheimer’s disease.

Step 6: Interaction with other cell types and structures

Finally, when assessing microglia using light microscopy, the examiner should look for any signs of excessive interactions and/or physical contacts with other cell types or structures. In the case of close physical contact with neurons, the phagocytosis of neurons by microglia, so-called neuronophagy, could be observed (Fig. 3, step 6). The interaction with oligodendrocytes is of special interest, in particular regarding inflammatory demyelinating disorders such as MS. The Luxol-Fast-Blue-Periodic-Acid-Schiff (LFB-PAS) stain can help to find demyelinating plaques. Moreover, small cells containing vibrant blue-stained myelin fragments demonstrate myeloid cells that are actively phagocyting white matter components. Iba1-positive cells are also found after ischemic events: the histopathological findings in a subacute ischemic brain infarct, phase II, includes the infiltration of macrophages [76].

In neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the formation of Aβ deposits, plaque-associated microglia can be present [27].

Both microglia and macrophages are known for colonizing CNS neoplasms, as for example gliomas. The so-called tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have been carefully characterized and their therapeutic potential is currently being explored [22].

Novel cell markers for microglia in the healthy and diseased CNS

After purification using a 37% Percoll gradient, microglia can be identified by flow cytometry with leukocyte common antigen (CD45) and integrin alpha M (ITGAM, CD11b) as commonly used markers [7, 36]. These markers can also be used to target CNS-associated macrophages (CAMs, e.g. perivascular macrophages) if the tissue has been digested enzymatically before [26]. Cells positive for lineage markers (T-cell surface glycoprotein CD3, B-lymphocyte antigen CD19, B-lymphocyte antigen CD20) should ideally be excluded.

With its spatial resolution and the possibility of assessing the cell morphology, immunohistochemistry is particularly well suited for the analysis of microglia. As discussed earlier, the immunohistochemical reaction against Iba1 labels brain-resident microglia, CAMs as well as blood-borne myeloid cells that invade the brain parenchyma under certain conditions. Transmembrane protein 119 (TMEM119) [2] and P2Y purinoceptor 12 (P2RY12) [6] were reported as novel markers that help to discriminate between microglia, CAMs and infiltrating myeloid cells. Both markers were shown to be expressed on microglia, but not on CAMs and infiltrating monocytes. Therefore, a cell within the brain parenchyma with positivity for TMEM119 or P2RY12 can be unambiguously identified as microglia cell (Fig. 4). P2RY12 is an excellent marker for the homeostatic phenotype of microglia and is rapidly lost in many pathologies. Although TMEM119 is also downregulated upon activation, this process is incomplete and often takes more time. Both markers have been used in a detailed phenotypic characterization of microglia in multiple sclerosis lesions [79]. Thus, TMEM119 is a good marker for microglia in initial and early lesions, but becomes less useful with lesion maturation (Fig. 4). Further microglia characterization was then achieved by the use of markers, which define specific functional states. As examples, the expression of MHC Class I or II antigens or CD86 is related to antigen presentation, CD68 to phagocytosis, iNOS and molecules of the NOX-2 complex to the production of nitric oxide and oxygen intermediates, and Fc- and complement receptors to the uptake of opsonized tissue elements. Ferritin indicates iron loading. Novel CAM-specific markers are supplementing the technical repertoire. The gene Mrc1 encoding for the mannose receptor (CD206), for instance, is expressed on CAMs and barely on microglia. Perivascular macrophages, for instance, also express the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich type 1 protein M130 (CD163), a receptor for hemoglobin–haptoglobin complexes [29]. While homeostatic microglia show no expression of CD163, it has been shown that parenchymal myeloid cells can upregulate CD163 under certain conditions [79]. Commonly used markers are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 4
figure4

Spatial heterogeneity of the myeloid compartment within a single tissue section of a patient with encephalitis revealed by P2RY12 and TMEM119 immunohistochemistry. The immunohistochemical reactions for P2RY12 (brown, upper panel) and TMEM119 (brown, lower panel) are shown in two regions of the same tissue section of a patient with encephalitis. The microglia cells (as identified by P2RY12) positivity show a downregulation/loss of TMEM119 upon activation. Counterstaining with haematoxylin (blue). Scale bar: 100 µm

Table 1 Commonly used immunomarkers for the characterization of different microglial states in the healthy and diseased murine and human CNS are shown

Transcriptional/epigenetic changes and chromatin accessibility in microglia

During the last decade, the microglial transcriptome has been studied extensively in mice and humans under both homeostatic and disease conditions [19, 32]. Despite minor differences across different studies, there is a unique microglial core gene signature that is partially overlapping with other tissue macrophages outside the CNS. Among those, genes encoding for transcription factors (e.g. Sall1 [32]), (cell surface) receptors (Cx3cr1, Gpr34, Fcrls [32], P2ry12, Csf1r), and enzymes (Hexb) have been described (Fig. 5). Of note, some genes are downregulated upon activation, for example P2RY12 [6] as described above. Microglia cells can be identified by their distinct transcriptomic signature [20]. Histone modifications (e.g. H3K9 and H3K27 acetylation [9, 32] or H3K4 (tri)methylation [32, 37, 45]) can be identified by chromatin immunoprecipitation DNA-sequencing (ChIP-Seq). Those histone modifications may lead to enhanced chromatin accessibility, ultimately influencing the cell’s transcriptome [37]. An assay of transposase-accessible chromatin and subsequent sequencing (ATAC-seq) [5, 45] is commonly used to investigate the genome-wide chromatin accessibility.

Fig. 5
figure5

Novel high-throughput technologies expand the diagnostic spectrum of research on microglia. Several emerging cutting-edge methods for studying the microglial phenotype are depicted in a graphical manner. The pictograms demonstrate a gene expression heatmap (Bulk RNA sequencing), a droplet-based analysis of single cells with subsequent t-SNE visualization (Single-cell RNA sequencing), the chromatin landscape using ATAC-seq (epigenetic changes and chromatin accessibility), an objective slide incubating with metal-coupled antibodies with subsequent single-cell analysis (CyTOF-based Imaging Mass Cytometry), barcoded antibodies in combination with droplet-based microfluidics system (combined transcriptomics and proteomics) and a tissue section analyzed by in-situ-sequencing as well as two microglia cells with different intracellular symbols representing different genes (transcriptomics with spatial resolution)

Assessing microglia heterogeneity on the single-cell level

While conventional imaging methods suggest that microglia form a comparatively homogenous population, recent studies demonstrated that microglia are heterogeneous. By using single-cell RNA-sequencing technology, microglia can be divided into distinct (disease-specific) states or subclusters [26, 27, 36, 48]. The gene expression pattern of the disease-associated clusters is of particular interest. Since novel, therapeutic targets may only be expressed on cells of a certain cluster, they can easily be missed when analyzing all microglia as a whole. Consequently, the analysis on the single-cell level is a promising approach in microglia research. So far, many CNS pathologies and their respective animal models have been analyzed using single-cell RNA sequencing approaches, e.g. Alzheimer’s disease [27, 48], Multiple Sclerosis [26, 36] or gliomas [12]. Intracerebral macrophages other than microglia, i.e. perivascular macrophages, meningeal macrophages and choroid plexus macrophages are commonly summarized as CAMs [26] or border-associated macrophages (BAMs) [43]. Single-cell technologies have tremendously helped to better understand CAMs/BAMs in health and disease [26, 43, 73]. Single-cell RNA-sequencing was able to define myeloid cell clusters in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 mutant astrocytomas that were not present in IDH-1 wild-type gliomas, which may have both diagnostic and therapeutic consequences [12].

Novel techniques in microglia research

New high-throughput technologies continuously complement the existing spectrum of experimental methods, in particular in the field of proteomics [63], metabolomics [72] and lipidomics [46] (Fig. 5). Cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) allows the simultaneous investigation of more than forty markers in single-cell suspensions, strongly expanding the possible number of channels comparted to conventional flow cytometry [43]. CyTOF-based techniques, e.g. imaging mass cytometry (IMC) or multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI), add spatial information to single-cell data at protein level [62]. Using IMC together with clinical data such as long-term survival, new subgroups of disease entities could be identified [25]. Moreover, this technique has recently been used to characterize the immune landscape in the brainstem of patients who died of COVID-19 [62].

Furthermore, novel techniques combining different analyses are emerging, e.g. cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq) or RNA expression and protein sequencing (REAP-seq) linking transcriptomics and proteomics [17]. Different subsets of tumor-associated macrophages in glioblastomas could be identified by applying CITE-seq [51]. In-situ sequencing (ISS) or in-situ capture approaches (e.g. the Cartana or Visium platform) aim to link transcriptomic information to spatial distribution [8, 39]. Another RNA sequencing technique with spatial resolution is Slide-seq that was used to characterize traumatic brain injury in mice [58].

Chances and limitations of the new technologies

The amount of data obtained through the use of novel high-throughput methods is huge and data analysis is quite complex. However, to what extent the findings from animal models can be transferred to the situation in a human being is a recurring question. In this regard, especially three aspects are important to note. First, in spite of a common core gene expression signature that is preserved across evolution, microglia from animals and humans show distinct differences in gene expression and (as a consequence) presumably in cell function. Secondly, the genetic basis is more diverse in human individuals compared to inbred mice. It is therefore conceivable that some individuals show a certain predisposition for enhanced microglia activation. This hypothesis is supported by the clinical course of microgliopathies. Microgliopathies form a group of hereditary diseases in which a gene mutation in myeloid cells leads to neurodegenerative symptoms in particular. Studying those rare entities might lead to a better understanding of microglia-driven brain pathologies in general. Thirdly, it has been shown that microglia are both reacting quickly and acting in a long-term manner, likely due to an epigenetic reprogramming of the cells [75]. Thus, an observed microglial phenotype can be caused by any prior alteration of brain homeostasis. This means that comorbidities, medications, former and current infections and any other environmental factor throughout life have to be taken into account when analyzing tissue specimens. While those factors should be well controlled in animal models, choosing the right control group for human samples can be challenging.

All novel methods come with their very own challenges and hurdles. Those challenges can be of a technical (e.g. low RNA sequencing depth) or conceptual nature (e.g. high gene expression pattern does not necessarily lead to higher protein levels). Another issue is the tissue availability. Many techniques do require specific tissue preservation protocols other than formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE). Novel technologies such as the CyTOF-based Imaging Mass Cytometry also use FFPE samples, granting access to biobanks with archival human material. This technique has recently been used to examine the changes within the CNS after SARS-CoV-2 infection [62]. Using FFPE tissue, this method may connect cutting-edge technology with daily pathological routine diagnostics.

Despite all technical progress, research projects using sophisticated novel technologies do need a clear experimental design and research strategy. Respective investigations have to be performed with a clearly defined research plan. The human material should be classified perfectly and stored adequately. Proper controls including suitable disease controls must be included. Therefore, the collection of an optimal patient cohort remains a major challenge when studying CNS pathologies.

Outlook

Since microglia rapidly react to even subtle alterations in CNS homeostasis, they can be seen as sensors for neurological dysfunctions and/or disorders. Many of them are far from being understood completely. Investigating microglia in the disease context might lead to a better understanding of the respective disease itself. Given their ability to modulate CNS pathologies, studying microglia possibly creates new therapeutic options as well [52]. Vice versa, the absence of microglia alterations strongly indicates the absence of any neuropathology.

In this review, we have summarized the technical possibilities for analyzing microglia phenotypes in tissue specimens obtained from humans and animals. We have proposed a simple step-by-step protocol for analyzing microglia phenotypes in histology. It should enable researchers of any specialty to evaluate the microglial phenotype in any given tissue sample. Furthermore, it should provide ideas for more detailed, subsequent experiments.

So far, virtually all available techniques for the analysis of microglia cells rely on tissue: either as a whole (e.g. for histological analyses) or processed (e.g. as a single-cell suspension for single-cell RNA sequencing). This is not a major constraint for the analysis of animal models or post-mortem autopsy cases. Contrarily, it is a limitation in patients with a suspected brain pathology. With very good reason, CNS biopsies are not taken carelessly or casually. However, not having a biopsy specimen implies not knowing anything about the microglial phenotype that could inform about the underlying (or even a just developing) pathology. Therefore, the development of non-invasive techniques for the analysis of the microglial phenotypes might close the gap. As such, PET imaging with microglia-specific radiotracers in the future sounds tempting. Detecting disease-specific microglia metabolites in liquid biopsies might be another promising approach.

Taken together, the technical possibilities for studying microglia have evolved rapidly in recent years. New methods provided unprecedented insights into microglia biology in general as well as into the etiology and course of many CNS disorders. Despite of all the progress made, the potential of microglia has certainly not yet been fully exploited. Many more exciting years in microglia research are yet to come.

References

  1. 1.

    Askew K, Li K, Olmos-Alonso A, Garcia-Moreno F, Liang Y, Richardson P et al (2017) Coupled proliferation and apoptosis maintain the rapid turnover of microglia in the adult brain. Cell Rep 18:391–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.041

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bennett ML, Bennett FC, Liddelow SA, Ajami B, Zamanian JL, Fernhoff NB et al (2016) New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E1738-1746. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525528113

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bruck W, Porada P, Poser S, Rieckmann P, Hanefeld F, Kretzschmar HA et al (1995) Monocyte/macrophage differentiation in early multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 38:788–796. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410380514

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bruttger J, Karram K, Wortge S, Regen T, Marini F, Hoppmann N et al (2015) Genetic cell ablation reveals clusters of local self-renewing microglia in the mammalian central nervous system. Immunity 43:92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.012

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ (2015) ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb2129s109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Butovsky O, Jedrychowski MP, Moore CS, Cialic R, Lanser AJ, Gabriely G et al (2014) Identification of a unique TGF-beta-dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia. Nat Neurosci 17:131–143. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3599

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cardona AE, Huang D, Sasse ME, Ransohoff RM (2006) Isolation of murine microglial cells for RNA analysis or flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 1:1947–1951. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.327

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chen WT, Lu A, Craessaerts K, Pavie B, Sala Frigerio C, Corthout N et al (2020) Spatial transcriptomics and in situ sequencing to study Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 182(976–991):e919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.038

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Datta M, Staszewski O, Raschi E, Frosch M, Hagemeyer N, Tay TL et al (2018) Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 regulate microglia function during development, homeostasis, and neurodegeneration in a context-dependent manner. Immunity 48(514–529):e516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.02.016

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Randolph GJ (2014) Origin and functions of tissue macrophages. Immunity 41:21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.013

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Erny D, Hrabe de Angelis AL, Jaitin D, Wieghofer P, Staszewski O, David E et al (2015) Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci 18:965–977. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4030

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Friedrich M, Sankowski R, Bunse L, Kilian M, Green E, Ramallo Guevara C et al (2021) Tryptophan metabolism drives dynamic immunosuppressive myeloid states in IDH-mutant gliomas. Nature Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-021-00201-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fuger P, Hefendehl JK, Veeraraghavalu K, Wendeln AC, Schlosser C, Obermuller U et al (2017) Microglia turnover with aging and in an Alzheimer’s model via long-term in vivo single-cell imaging. Nat Neurosci 20:1371–1376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4631

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Garcia-Cabezas MA, John YJ, Barbas H, Zikopoulos B (2016) Distinction of neurons, glia and endothelial cells in the cerebral cortex: an algorithm based on cytological features. Front Neuroanat 10:107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2016.00107

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Garman RH (2011) Histology of the central nervous system. Toxicol Pathol 39:22–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623310389621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Geirsdottir L, David E, Keren-Shaul H, Weiner A, Bohlen SC, Neuber J et al (2019) Cross-species single-cell analysis reveals divergence of the primate microglia program. Cell 179(1609–1622):e1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.010

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Golomb SM, Guldner IH, Zhao A, Wang Q, Palakurthi B, Aleksandrovic EA et al (2020) Multi-modal single-cell analysis reveals brain immune landscape plasticity during aging and gut microbiota dysbiosis. Cell Rep 33:108438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108438

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gomez-Nicola D, Fransen NL, Suzzi S, Perry VH (2013) Regulation of microglial proliferation during chronic neurodegeneration. J Neurosci 33:2481–2493. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4440-12.2013

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gosselin D, Link VM, Romanoski CE, Fonseca GJ, Eichenfield DZ, Spann NJ et al (2014) Environment drives selection and function of enhancers controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities. Cell 159:1327–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.023

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gosselin D, Skola D, Coufal NG, Holtman IR, Schlachetzki JCM, Sajti E et al (2017) An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Grajchen E, Hendriks JJA, Bogie JFJ (2018) The physiology of foamy phagocytes in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol Commun 6:124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-018-0628-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hambardzumyan D, Gutmann DH, Kettenmann H (2016) The role of microglia and macrophages in glioma maintenance and progression. Nat Neurosci 19:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4185

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hametner S, Wimmer I, Haider L, Pfeifenbring S, Bruck W, Lassmann H (2013) Iron and neurodegeneration in the multiple sclerosis brain. Ann Neurol 74:848–861. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23974

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Horti AG, Naik R, Foss CA, Minn I, Misheneva V, Du Y et al (2019) PET imaging of microglia by targeting macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:1686–1691. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812155116

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jackson HW, Fischer JR, Zanotelli VRT, Ali HR, Mechera R, Soysal SD et al (2020) The single-cell pathology landscape of breast cancer. Nature 578:615–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1876-x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jordao MJC, Sankowski R, Brendecke SM, Sagar LG, Tai YH, Tay TL et al (2019) Single-cell profiling identifies myeloid cell subsets with distinct fates during neuroinflammation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK et al (2017) A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 169(1276–1290):e1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kierdorf K, Erny D, Goldmann T, Sander V, Schulz C, Perdiguero EG et al (2013) Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways. Nat Neurosci 16:273–280. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3318

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kim JS, Kolesnikov M, Peled-Hajaj S, Scheyltjens I, Xia Y, Trzebanski S et al (2020) A Binary Cre transgenic approach dissects microglia and CNS border-associated macrophages. Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.11.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Koole M, Schmidt ME, Hijzen A, Ravenstijn P, Vandermeulen C, Van Weehaeghe D et al (2019) (18)F-JNJ-64413739, a novel PET ligand for the P2X7 ion channel: radiation dosimetry, kinetic modeling, test-retest variability, and occupancy of the P2X7 antagonist JNJ-54175446. J Nucl Med 60:683–690. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.216747

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lassmann H, Schmied M, Vass K, Hickey WF (1993) Bone marrow derived elements and resident microglia in brain inflammation. Glia 7:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.440070106

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lavin Y, Winter D, Blecher-Gonen R, David E, Keren-Shaul H, Merad M et al (2014) Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell 159:1312–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.018

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Luo Y, Duan H, Qian Y, Feng L, Wu Z, Wang F et al (2017) Macrophagic CD146 promotes foam cell formation and retention during atherosclerosis. Cell Res 27:352–372. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2017.8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Magnus T, Chan A, Grauer O, Toyka KV, Gold R (2001) Microglial phagocytosis of apoptotic inflammatory T cells leads to down-regulation of microglial immune activation. J Immunol 167:5004–5010. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.9.5004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mass E, Jacome-Galarza CE, Blank T, Lazarov T, Durham BH, Ozkaya N et al (2017) A somatic mutation in erythro-myeloid progenitors causes neurodegenerative disease. Nature 549:389–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23672

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Masuda T, Sankowski R, Staszewski O, Bottcher C, Amann L, Sagar SC et al (2019) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single-cell resolution. Nature 566:388–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0924-x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Matcovitch-Natan O, Winter DR, Giladi A, Vargas Aguilar S, Spinrad A, Sarrazin S et al (2016) Microglia development follows a stepwise program to regulate brain homeostasis. Science 353:aad8670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8670

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Matschke J, Lutgehetmann M, Hagel C, Sperhake JP, Schroder AS, Edler C et al (2020) Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: a post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol 19:919–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30308-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Maynard KR, Collado-Torres L, Weber LM, Uytingco C, Barry BK, Williams SR et al (2021) Transcriptome-scale spatial gene expression in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 24:425–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00787-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mendiola AS, Ryu JK, Bardehle S, Meyer-Franke A, Ang KK, Wilson C et al (2020) Transcriptional profiling and therapeutic targeting of oxidative stress in neuroinflammation. Nat Immunol 21:513–524. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-0654-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mezo C, Dokalis N, Mossad O, Staszewski O, Neuber J, Yilmaz B et al (2020) Different effects of constitutive and induced microbiota modulation on microglia in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 8:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-020-00988-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mori S, Leblond CP (1969) Identification of microglia in light and electron microscopy. J Comp Neurol 135:57–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901350104

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mrdjen D, Pavlovic A, Hartmann FJ, Schreiner B, Utz SG, Leung BP et al (2018) High-dimensional single-cell mapping of central nervous system immune cells reveals distinct myeloid subsets in health, aging, and disease. Immunity 48(380–395):e386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.011

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ni R, Mu L, Ametamey S (2019) Positron emission tomography of type 2 cannabinoid receptors for detecting inflammation in the central nervous system. Acta Pharmacol Sin 40:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-018-0035-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nott A, Holtman IR, Coufal NG, Schlachetzki JCM, Yu M, Hu R et al (2019) Brain cell type-specific enhancer-promoter interactome maps and disease-risk association. Science 366:1134–1139. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay0793

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Nugent AA, Lin K, van Lengerich B, Lianoglou S, Przybyla L, Davis SS et al (2020) TREM2 regulates microglial cholesterol metabolism upon chronic phagocytic challenge. Neuron 105(837–854):e839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.007

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Nutma E, Gebro E, Marzin MC, van der Valk P, Matthews PM, Owen DR et al (2021) Activated microglia do not increase 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) expression in the multiple sclerosis brain. Glia 69:2447–2458. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.24052

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Olah M, Menon V, Habib N, Taga MF, Ma Y, Yung CJ et al (2020) Single cell RNA sequencing of human microglia uncovers a subset associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun 11:6129. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19737-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, Maggi L, Scianni M, Panzanelli P et al (2011) Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science 333:1456–1458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202529

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Perez-Cerda F, Sanchez-Gomez MV, Matute C (2015) Pio del Rio Hortega and the discovery of the oligodendrocytes. Front Neuroanat 9:92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2015.00092

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pombo Antunes AR, Scheyltjens I, Lodi F, Messiaen J, Antoranz A, Duerinck J et al (2021) Single-cell profiling of myeloid cells in glioblastoma across species and disease stage reveals macrophage competition and specialization. Nat Neurosci 24:595–610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00789-y

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Priller J, Prinz M (2019) Targeting microglia in brain disorders. Science 365:32–33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau9100

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Prinz M, Jung S, Priller J (2019) Microglia biology: one century of evolving concepts. Cell 179:292–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.053

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Prinz M, Masuda T, Wheeler MA, Quintana FJ (2021) Microglia and central nervous system-associated macrophages-from origin to disease modulation. Annu Rev Immunol 39:251–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-093019-110159

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Prinz M, Priller J (2014) Microglia and brain macrophages in the molecular age: from origin to neuropsychiatric disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 15:300–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3722

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Rademakers R, Baker M, Nicholson AM, Rutherford NJ, Finch N, Soto-Ortolaza A et al (2011) Mutations in the colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) gene cause hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids. Nat Genet 44:200–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1027

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Riikonen J, Jaatinen P, Rintala J, Porsti I, Karjala K, Hervonen A (2002) Intermittent ethanol exposure increases the number of cerebellar microglia. Alcohol Alcohol 37:421–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/37.5.421

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Rodriques SG, Stickels RR, Goeva A, Martin CA, Murray E, Vanderburg CR et al (2019) Slide-seq: a scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science 363:1463–1467. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1219

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Savage JC, Picard K, Gonzalez-Ibanez F, Tremblay ME (2018) A Brief history of microglial ultrastructure: distinctive features, phenotypes, and functions discovered over the past 60 years by electron microscopy. Front Immunol 9:803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00803

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Schultz RL, Maynard EA, Pease DC (1957) Electron microscopy of neurons and neuroglia of cerebral cortex and corpus callosum. Am J Anat 100:369–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001000305

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Schwabenland M, Mossad O, Peres AG, Kessler F, Maron FJM, Harsan LA et al (2019) Loss of USP18 in microglia induces white matter pathology. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7:106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0757-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Schwabenland M, Salie H, Tanevski J, Killmer S, Lago MS, Schlaak AE et al (2021) Deep spatial profiling of human COVID-19 brains reveals neuroinflammation with distinct microanatomical microglia-T-cell interactions. Immunity 54(1594–1610):e1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.06.002

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Sharma K, Schmitt S, Bergner CG, Tyanova S, Kannaiyan N, Manrique-Hoyos N et al (2015) Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome. Nat Neurosci 18:1819–1831. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4160

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Sierra A, de Castro F, Del Rio-Hortega J, Rafael Iglesias-Rozas J, Garrosa M, Kettenmann H (2016) The “Big-Bang” for modern glial biology: translation and comments on Pio del Rio-Hortega 1919 series of papers on microglia. Glia 64:1801–1840. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Singh S, Metz I, Amor S, van der Valk P, Stadelmann C, Bruck W (2013) Microglial nodules in early multiple sclerosis white matter are associated with degenerating axons. Acta Neuropathol 125:595–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1082-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Stankoff B, Poirion E, Tonietto M, Bodini B (2018) Exploring the heterogeneity of MS lesions using positron emission tomography: a reappraisal of their contribution to disability. Brain Pathol 28:723–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12641

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Streit WJ (1990) An improved staining method for rat microglial cells using the lectin from Griffonia simplicifolia (GSA I-B4). J Histochem Cytochem 38:1683–1686. https://doi.org/10.1177/38.11.2212623

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Streit WJ, Xue QS, Tischer J, Bechmann I (2014) Microglial pathology. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2:142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-014-0142-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Sucksdorff M, Matilainen M, Tuisku J, Polvinen E, Vuorimaa A, Rokka J et al (2020) Brain TSPO-PET predicts later disease progression independent of relapses in multiple sclerosis. Brain 143:3318–3330. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa275

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Tada M, Konno T, Tada M, Tezuka T, Miura T, Mezaki N et al (2016) Characteristic microglial features in patients with hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids. Ann Neurol 80:554–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24754

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Tay TL, Mai D, Dautzenberg J, Fernandez-Klett F, Lin G, Sagar DM et al (2017) A new fate mapping system reveals context-dependent random or clonal expansion of microglia. Nat Neurosci 20:793–803. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4547

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Ulland TK, Song WM, Huang SC, Ulrich JD, Sergushichev A, Beatty WL et al (2017) TREM2 maintains microglial metabolic fitness in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 170(649–663):e613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.023

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Van Hove H, Martens L, Scheyltjens I, De Vlaminck K, Pombo Antunes AR, De Prijck S et al (2019) A single-cell atlas of mouse brain macrophages reveals unique transcriptional identities shaped by ontogeny and tissue environment. Nat Neurosci 22:1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0393-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Vivash L, O’Brien TJ (2016) Imaging microglial activation with TSPO PET: lighting up neurologic diseases? J Nucl Med 57:165–168. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.141713

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Wendeln AC, Degenhardt K, Kaurani L, Gertig M, Ulas T, Jain G et al (2018) Innate immune memory in the brain shapes neurological disease hallmarks. Nature 556:332–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0023-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wimmer I, Zrzavy T, Lassmann H (2018) Neuroinflammatory responses in experimental and human stroke lesions. J Neuroimmunol 323:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.07.003

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Yun SP, Kam TI, Panicker N, Kim S, Oh Y, Park JS et al (2018) Block of A1 astrocyte conversion by microglia is neuroprotective in models of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Med 24:931–938. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0051-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Zhan Y, Paolicelli RC, Sforazzini F, Weinhard L, Bolasco G, Pagani F et al (2014) Deficient neuron-microglia signaling results in impaired functional brain connectivity and social behavior. Nat Neurosci 17:400–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3641

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Zrzavy T, Hametner S, Wimmer I, Butovsky O, Weiner HL, Lassmann H (2017) Loss of “homeostatic” microglia and patterns of their activation in active multiple sclerosis. Brain 140:1900–1913. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx113

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Figures 1 and 5 were created with BioRender.com.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hans Lassmann or Marco Prinz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

H. Lassmann and M. Prinz are editorial board members of Acta Neuropathologica. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

401_2021_2370_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplementary Figure 1: Exemplary step-by-step protocol for performing an immunohistochemistry on human or murine tissue sections as commonly performed at the Institute for Neuropathology at the University Medical Center Freiburg. The protocol for the preparation of cryopreserved sections (upper left) or FFPE sections (upper right) is shown. Below, the steps for fluorescent (lower left) and chromogenic (lower right) immunohistochemistries (e.g. for Iba1, TMEM119 or P2RY12) are explained. Supplementary Figure 2: Different microglia/macrophage morphologies are depicted in exemplary patient samples. The immunohistochemistry for Iba1 (brown) is exemplarily shown in different CNS pathologies. Counterstaining with haematoxylin (blue). Scale bar: 100 µm. a: CNS myeloid cells first need to be identified based on the anatomical location: a haematopoetic Iba1-positive cell can be observed within a blood vessel (asterisk). Within the meninges, meningeal macrophages are labelled by Iba1 (blue arrows). Perivascular macrophages present with an elongated shape and less ramifications compared to microglia (green arrows). The density of parenchymal microglia (black arrows) appears normal. The cells are ramified and do not show a spiky phenotype. The distribution pattern appears regular with the cells respecting each other’s territory. No distinct microglial phenotypes are observed. Moreover, there is no excessive interaction with other cell types. In sum, the microglial phenotype appears homeostatic. b: The cell density in sample b is comparable to sample a. Microglia with ramifications can be found (arrows). In some areas, small parenchymal Iba1-positive cells with less protrusions are visible, resembling an activated phenotype. Nevertheless, the cells do respect each other’s territory. c: Iba1-positive cells with a characteristic “spiky” morphology are seen (arrows). d: A similar phenotype with “thorny” cells can be observed in d. Some cells appear to have less protrusions (asterisks). e: Spatial differences can be identified in e. The cells in closer vicinity to the lesion (blue arrow) look more condensed compared to more distant microglia (green arrow) showing fine protrusions. The cells even closer to the lesion do no longer have any processes. They show overlapping territories. f: The macrophages in the glioblastoma specimen in f are comparatively large in size (arrows). g: Some ramified cells can be found in sample g (arrow). A large number of Iba1-positive cells appears small and round, indicating haematopoetic cells. h: Iba1-positive haematopoetic cells are also found within blood vessels in h (asterisks). A perivascular macrophage can be identified (blue arrow). A few cells show a slightly ramified morphology (green arrow). Many cells have undergone foam cell transformation (black arrows), indicating an active debris clearance. (PDF 7066 KB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwabenland, M., Brück, W., Priller, J. et al. Analyzing microglial phenotypes across neuropathologies: a practical guide. Acta Neuropathol 142, 923–936 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-021-02370-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Microglia
  • Microglia morphology
  • Microglia histology
  • Microglia immunohistochemistry
  • Microglia markers
  • Iba1
  • Human microglia
  • Microglia histopathology
  • Microglia phenotype