A comparative study on capability of emulsion models for predicting the viscoelastic behavior of ternary polymer blends with core-shell morphology

  • Zeinab Javidi
  • Mahboube Mohamadi
  • Hossein NazockdastEmail author
Original Contribution


The goal of this study was to find a way to apply existing constitutive viscoelastic models on ternary polymer blends forming core-shell morphology. An attempt was also made to quantify the interfacial tension through the melt linear viscoelastic properties. High-density polyethylene (HDPE)/polystyrene (PS)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) ternary blend system with core-shell morphology was selected as a model. Blends comprising different compositions were prepared via melt mixing. The viscoelastic data required for this research was obtained via small amplitude oscillatory experiments performed on the blend components, binary blends and ternary blend. Several constitutive rheological models including Palierne, Bousmina, Dickie and Jacobs were considered using different approaches for the definition of core-shell as a dispersed phase. The Jacobs model was found to be in good agreement with the experimental results. This could be explained in terms of contribution of additional interfacial tension in the deformation of core-shell droplets, which is more compatible with the assumptions made in the Jacobs model. Nonlinear viscoelastic properties of the samples were also investigated to provide more insights into understanding the role of core-shell (PS/PMMA) droplets on determining the viscoelastic behavior of the ternary blend.


Ternary polymer blend Core-shell morphology Rheology Interfacial tension Viscoelastic properties 



  1. Alghunaim A, Kirdponpattara S, Newby BZ (2016) Techniques for determining contact angle and wettability of powders. Powder Technol 287:201–215. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babaei A, Arefazar A (2014) Phase structure of polyamide 6/poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) and poly (styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene) or poly (maleated styrene/ethylene-co-butylene/styrene) ternary blends. J Macromol Sci Part B Phys 53:1377–1393. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bousmina M (1999) Rheology of polymer blends: linear model for viscoelastic emulsions. Rheol Acta 38:73–83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bousmina M, Muller R (1993) Linear viscoelasticity in the melt of impact PMMA. Influence of concentration and aggregation of dispersed rubber particles. J Rheol 37:663–679. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi J, Ryu J, Kim SY (2000) A linear viscoelastic model of matrix/core–shell modifier polymer blends. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 38:942–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comas-cardona S, Tucker CL (2011) Measurements of droplet deformation in simple shear flow with zero interfacial tension. J Rheol 45:259–273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickie RA (1973) Heterogeneous polymer-polymer composites. I. Theory of viscoelastic properties and equivalent mechanical model. J Appl Polym Sci 17:45–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahrlander M, Friedrich C (1999) Rheological properties of polymer blends with sphere-in-sphere morphology. Rheol Acta 38:206–213. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foudazi R, Nazockdast H (2009) Rheology of polypropylene/liquid crystalline polymer blends: effect of compatibilizer and silica. Appl Rheol 20:1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graebling D, Muller R, Palierne JF (1993) Linear viscoelastic behavior of some incompatible polymer blends in the melt. Interpretation of data with a model of emulsion of viscoelastic liquids. Macromolecules 26:320–329. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassanpour Asl F, Saeb MR, Jafari SH et al (2018) Looking back to interfacial tension prediction in the compatibilized polymer blends: discrepancies between theories and experiments. J Appl Polym Sci 135:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hemmati M, Nazokdast H, Panahi HS (2001a) Study on morphology of ternary polymer blends. I Effects of melt viscosity and interfacial interaction. J Appl Polym Sci 82:1129–1137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hemmati M, Nazokdast H, Panahi HS (2001b) Study on morphology of ternary polymer blends. II Effect of composition. J Appl Polym Sci 82:1138–1146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsieh Y-L (1995) Liquid transport in fabric structures. Text Res J 65:299–307. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iza M, Bousmina M, Je R (2001) Rheology of compatibilized immiscible viscoelastic polymer blends. Rheol Acta 40:10–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobs U, Fahrländer M, Winterhalter J, Friedrich C (1999) Analysis of Palierne’s emulsion model in the case of viscoelastic interfacial properties. J Rheol 43:1495. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Javidi Z, Tarashi Z, Rostami A, Nazockdast H (2017) Role of nanosilica localization on morphology development of HDPE/PS/PMMA immiscible ternary blends. Express Polym Lett 11:362–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerner EH (1956) The elastic and thermoelastic properties of composite media. Proc Phys Soc sect B A9:808–813. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khoshnood M, Babaei A (2018) Elasticity or viscosity, which one is more influential on the internal structure of a core-shell morphology in ternary blends? J Polym Res 25:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khoshnood M, Babaei A, Zabihi E (2017) Towards finding the best existing model for prediction of morphology of ternary polymer blends. J Macromol Sci Part B Phys 56:541–552. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Macaubas PHP, Demarquette NR, Dealy JM (2005) Nonlinear viscoelasticity of PP / PS / SEBS blends. Rheol Acta 44:295–312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mohamadi M, Garmabi H, Papila M (2016) Effect of miscibility state on crystallization behavior and polymorphism in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(ethylene oxide). Macromol Res 28:698–709. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohamadi M, Garmabi H, Papila M (2017) Conjugated dual phase transitions in crystalline/crystalline blend of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(ethylene oxide). Polym Bull 74:2117–2135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mohammadigoushki H, Nazockdast H, Mostofi N (2009) Morphology development and melt linear viscoelastic properties of (PA6/PP/PS) ternary blend systems. J Elastomers Plast 41:339–351. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mostofi N, Nazockdast H, Mohammadigoushki H (2009) Study on morphology and viscoelastic properties of PP/PET/SEBS ternary blend and their fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 114:3737–3743. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pal R (2007) On the viscoelastic behavior of multiple emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci 313:751–756. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Palierne JE (1990) Linear rheology of viscoelastic emulsions with interfacial tension. Rheol Acta 29:204–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rastin H, Jafari SH, Saeb MR et al (2014) On the reliability of existing theoretical models in anticipating type of morphology and domain size in HDPE/PA-6/EVOH ternary blends. Eur Polym J 53:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ravati S, Favis BD (2010) Morphological states for a ternary polymer blend demonstrating complete wetting. Polymer 51:4547–4561. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reignier J, Favis BD (2003) On the presence of a critical shell volume fraction leading to pseudo-pure droplet behavior in composite droplet polymer blends. Polymer 44:5061–5066. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reignier J, Favis BD, Heuzey M (2003) Factors influencing encapsulation behavior in composite droplet-type polymer blends. Polymer 44:49–59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rostami A, Nazockdast H, Karimi M, Javidi Z (2016) Role of multiwalled carbon nanotubes localization on morphology development of PMMA/PS/PP ternary blends. Adv Polym Technol 35:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Valera TS, Morita AT, Demarquette NR (2006) Study of morphologies of PMMA/PP/PS ternary blends. Macromolecules 39:2663–2675. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Hemelrijck E, Van Puyvelde P, Moldenaers P (2003) Interfacial elasticity and coalescence suppression in compatibilized polymer blends. J Rheol 48:143–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vanoene H (1972) Modes of dispersion of viscoelastic fluids in flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 40:448–467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vinckier I, Mewis J, Moldenaers P, Leuven KU (1997) Stress relaxation as a microstructural probe for immiscible polymer blends. Rheol Acta 36:513–523. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu S (1982) Polymer interface and adhesion. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Yee M, Calvão PS, Demarquette NR (2007) Rheological behavior of poly (methyl methacrylate )/polystyrene (PMMA/PS ) blends with the addition of PMMA-ran-PS. Rheol Acta 46:653–664. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeinab Javidi
    • 1
  • Mahboube Mohamadi
    • 2
  • Hossein Nazockdast
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Polymer Engineering and Color TechnologyAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Polymer Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations