Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 58, Issue 3–4, pp 173–181 | Cite as

Experimental evaluation of a novel modification of anionic guar gum with maleic anhydride for fracturing fluid

  • Zhaoyang Zhang
  • Jincheng MaoEmail author
  • Bo Yang
  • Xiaojiang Yang
  • Wenlong Zhang
  • Chong Zhang
  • Gregory S. Smith
Original Contribution
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

The content of insoluble substance in guar gum solution is high and its temperature resistance is poor. A novel anionic guar gum (GG) derivative was developed and grafted by modification with maleic anhydride. Compared with guar gum, the insoluble content of MAG solution decreased from 13 to 5%, the decomposition temperature of MAG increased from 285 to 308, and the viscoelasticity of MAG gel has been enhanced, especially elasticity. The rheological tests show that the corresponding fracturing fluid belongs to a non-Newtonian pseudoplastic one and the viscosity could maintain 50 mPa∙s for 2 h under conditions of 150 °C and 170 s−1, which can be applied in a high-temperature well. It is noteworthy that the synthetic protocol of maleate esters guar gum (MAG) is easily available, low cost, and practical. It is conducive to the industrial application of MAG. The work showed a great significance to the modification of GG with acid anhydride for fracturing fluid.

Keywords

Guar gum Modification Maleic anhydride Rheology Fracturing fluid 

Notes

Funding information

The research is supported by Sichuan Youth Science & Technology Foundation (2017JQ0010), National High Technology Research & Development Program (2016ZX05053), Key Fund Project of Educational Commission of Sichuan Province (16CZ0008), Explorative Project Fund (G201601) of State Key Laboratory of Oil, and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Southwest Petroleum University).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barré LL, Vaughan AS, Sutton SJ (2007) On the solid-state ageing behaviour of the polysaccharide, guar gum. J Mater Sci 42:5497–5507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borzenkov M, Mitina N, Lobaz V, Hevus O (2015) Synthesis and properties of novel surface active monomers based on derivatives of 4-ydroxybutyric acid and 6-ydroxyhexanoic acid. J Surfactants Deterg 18:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Britt LK (1985) Optimized oilwell fracturing of moderate-permeability reservoirs.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (September).  https://doi.org/10.2118/14371-MS
  4. Chandrika KP, Singh A, Rathore A, Kumar A (2016) Novel cross linked guar gum-g-poly(acrylate) porous superabsorbent hydrogels: characterization and swelling behaviour in different environments. Carbohydr Polym 149:175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Czarnecki S, Rossow T, Seiffert S (2016) Hybrid polymer-network hydrogels with tunable mechanical response. Polymers 8:82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawson JC, Le HV, Kesavan S (2003) Polymer expansion for oil and gas recovery. U.S. Patent No. 6,649,572. 18 NovGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson JC, Le HV, Kesavan S (2006) Oil and gas recovery from subterranean formations. U.S. Patent No. 7,012,044. 14 MarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu D, Federov A (2008) Crosslinked polymer solutions and methods of use. U.S. Patent Application No. 11/672,829Google Scholar
  9. Gong RY, Wu WH, Shi XF (2009) Synthesis and properties of hydrophobiclly modified hydroxypropyl guar gum. Polym Mater Sci Eng 25:132–134Google Scholar
  10. Hashmet MR, Onur M, Tan IM (2014) Empirical correlations for viscosity of polyacrylamide solutions with the effects of temperature and shear rate. II. J Dispers Sci Technol 35:1685–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kinsey EW, Harry DN, Dixon GR, Malekahmadi F, Dismuke KI (2010) Preparation of guar suspension from guar splits. U.S. Patent No. 7,790,774. 7 SepGoogle Scholar
  12. Kramer J, Chu A, Prudhomme RK (1989) Rheology and molecular structure of HPG gels. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.Society of Petroleum Engineers (October).  https://doi.org/10.2118/15632-MS
  13. Lei C, Clark PE (2004) Crosslinking of guar and guar derivatives. SPE J 12:316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ran Li (2017). Development and evaluation of high-temperature silanization and etherification guar based fracturing fluids[D]. Southwest Petroleum UniversityGoogle Scholar
  15. Mansa R, Detellier C (2013) Preparation and characterization of guar-montmorillonite nanocomposites. Materials 6:5199–5216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mao J, Wang D, Yang X, Zhang Z, Yang B, Zhang C, Zhao J (2018a) Experimental study on high temperature resistance aluminum-crosslinked non-aqueous fracturing fluids. J Mol Liq 258:202–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.032
  17. Mao J, Zhang H, Zhang W, Fan J, Zhang C, Zhao J (2018b) Dissymmetric beauty: a novel design of heterogemini viscoelastic surfactant for the clean fracturing fluid. J Ind Eng Chem 60:133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.10.048
  18. Mccleary BB (1978) Enzymic hydrolysis, fine structure, and gelling interaction of legume-seed D -galacto- D -mannans. Carbohydr Res 71:205–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mccleary BV, Clark AH, Dea ICM, Rees DA (1985) The fine structures of carob and guar galactomannans. Carbohydr Res 139:237–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Melbouci M, Nguyen TT, Young TS (2010) Oxidized guar for oilfield servicing fluids. U.S. Patent No. 7,851,416. 14 DecGoogle Scholar
  21. Moorhouse R, Harry D, Matthews L, Merchant U (1998) Inter-relationships between Polymer/Crosslinker Chemistry and performance in [C]//SPE India Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum.Engineers.  https://doi.org/10.2118/39531-MS
  22. Nixon SL, Walker L, Mdt S, Eden B, Boothman C, Taylor KG, Lloyd JR (2017) Guar gum stimulates biogenic sulfide production at elevated pressures: implications for shale gas extraction. Front Microbiol 8:679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Putzig DE (2010) Process to prepare borozirconate solution and use as a cross-linker in hydraulic fracturing fluids. U.S. Patent No. 7795190. 14 SepGoogle Scholar
  24. Tang H, Li S, Zhang D (2018) The effect of heterogeneity on hydraulic fracturing in shale. J Pet Sci Eng 162:292–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Venkataiah S, Mahadevan EG (1982) Rheological properties of hydroxypropyl- and sodium carboxymethyl-substituted guar gums in aqueous solution. J Appl Polym Sci 27:1533–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang S, Tang H, Guo J, Wang K (2016a) Effect of pH on the rheological properties of borate crosslinked hydroxypropyl guar gum hydrogel and hydroxypropyl guar gum. Carbohydr Polym 147:455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang L, Wang D, Shen Y, Lai X, Guo X (2016b) Study on properties of hydrophobic associating polymer as drag reduction agent for fracturing fluid. J Polym Res 23:235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang Z, Li X (2016) The shear mechanisms of natural fractures during the hydraulic stimulation of shale gas reservoirs. Materials 9(9):713.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090713
  29. Zhang Z, Mao J, Yang X, Zhao J, Smith GS (2016) Advances in waterless fracturing technologies for unconventional reservoirs. Energy Sources, Part A 1–15Google Scholar
  30. Zhao Y, He J, Han X, Tian X, Deng M, Chen W, Jiang B (2012) Modification of hydroxypropyl guar gum with ethanolamine. Carbohydr Polym 90:988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zou S, Wang K, Yin Q, Jiang B (2003) Recent progress in modification of guar gum. Chem Res Appl 15(3):317–320. Article number:1004-1656(2003)03-0317-04Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations