Degradation in parallel-disk rheometry

  • Alan Jeffrey GiacominEmail author
  • Rossana Pasquino
  • Chaimongkol Saengow
  • Peter Hunter Gilbert
Original Contribution


We analyze quantitatively the oxidative degradation of a sample in a parallel-disk rheometer, as oxygen diffuses inward, radially, from the free boundary. We examine rheometer error mitigation by means of nitrogen blanketing, and also, of parallel-disk partitioning. We arrive at exact analytical expressions for the oxygen concentration and, thus, for the degradation rate. We then integrate this rate over time to get the amount of oxygen reacted as a function of radial position and time in the degrading sample. To illustrate the usefulness of our analytical expressions, we provide two worked examples investigating the effect of nitrogen blanketing and parallel-disk partitioning. We find that, though nitrogen blanketing always produces less degradation, its benefits are limited for short times. Additionally, parallel-disk partitioning provides a simpler solution and allows samples to be run for longer times without degradation compromising measurement, even in samples initially saturated with oxygen. We also consider the effect of antioxidants. We also consider an important special case, without chemical reaction, where the sample dries by evaporation from its free surface. We close by comparing the roles played by polymer degradation in parallel-disk flow versus cone-plate flow.


Degradation Rheometer Polymer melt 



Principal’s Development Fund Visiting Scholar, R. Pasquino, thanks the Office of the Principal and the Chemical Engineering Department for supporting her stay at Queen’s University. This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to the support from the Canada Research Chairs program of the Government of Canada for the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Rheology. This research was also undertaken, in part, thanks to the support from the Discovery Grant program of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (A.J. Giacomin) and the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship (P.H. Gilbert).

Funding information

A.J. Giacomin is indebted to the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering of Queen’s University at Kingston, for its support through a Research Initiation Grant (RIG). P.H. Gilbert is grateful for an International Tuition Award from the School of Graduate Studies of Queen’s University at Kingston.


  1. Auriemma M, Piscitelli A, Pasquino R, Cerruti P, Malinconico M, Grizzuti N (2015) Blending poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) with tannic acid: influence of a polyphenolic natural additive on the rheological and thermal behavior. Eur Polym J 63:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billingham NC (2007) Degradation. In: Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology. Concise, 3rd edn. Wiley, pp 315–321Google Scholar
  3. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of polymeric liquids, Vol. 1, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (2007) Transport phenomena. Revised, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Damköhler G (1936) Einflüsse der Strömung, diffusion und des Wärmeüberganges auf die Leistung von reaktionsöfen.: I. allgemeine Gesichtspunkte für die übertragung eines chemischen Prozesses aus dem kleinen ins grosse. Z Elektrochem Angew Phys Chem 42:846–862Google Scholar
  7. Dealy JM, Wissbrun KF (1990) Melt rheology and its role in plastics processing: theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fowler RH (1914) Some results on the form near infinity of real continuous solutions of a certain type of second order differential equation. Proc Lond Math Soc 13:341–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fowler RH (1931) Further studies of Emden's and similar differential equations. Q J Math 2:259–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giacomin AJ, Gilbert PH, Merger D, Wilhelm M (2015) Large-amplitude oscillatory shear: comparing parallel-disk with cone-plate flow. Rheol Acta 54:263–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giacomin AJ, Gilbert PH (2018) Degradation in cone-plate rheometry. Rev Sci Instrum 89:124101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hellström LHO, Samaha MA, Wang KM, Smits AJ, Hultmark M (2015) Errors in parallel-plate and cone-plate rheometer measurements due to sample underfill. Meas Sci Technol 26:015301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nijenhuis K (2007) Part c specific experimental environments and techniques. In: Tropea C, Yarin AL, Foss JF (eds) Springer handbook of experimental fluid mechanics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Schweizer T (2002) Measurement of the first and second normal stress differences in a polystyrene melt with a cone and partitioned plate tool. Rheol Acta 41:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schweizer T (2003) Comparing cone-partitioned plate and cone-standard plate shear rheometry of a polystyrene melt. J Rheol 47:1071–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schweizer T (2004) A quick guide to better viscosity measurements of highly viscous fluids. Appl Rheol 14:197–201Google Scholar
  17. Schweizer T, van Meerveld J, Öttinger HC (2004) Nonlinear shear rheology of polystyrene melt with narrow molecular weight distribution-experiment and theory. J Rheol 48:1345–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Snijkers F, Vlassopoulos D (2011) Cone-partitioned-plate geometry for the ARES rheometer with temperature control. J Rheol 55:1167–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Uhniat M, Kudła S (2001) Stabilisation of LDPE cross-linked in the presence of peroxides: I Kinetic study of the oxidation. Polym Degrad Stab 71:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Jeffrey Giacomin
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Rossana Pasquino
    • 3
  • Chaimongkol Saengow
    • 1
  • Peter Hunter Gilbert
    • 1
  1. 1.Polymers Research Group, Chemical Engineering DepartmentQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Mechanical and Materials Engineering DepartmentQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production EngineeringUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations