Advertisement

Colloid and Polymer Science

, Volume 297, Issue 2, pp 213–224 | Cite as

Study on dispersion of reduced graphene oxide on physical performance of Polyvinylidene fluoride composites by Hansen solubility parameters

  • Weihui Zhu
  • Jing MaEmail author
  • Xi Nan
  • Patrick Osei Lartey
  • Yongzhen Yang
Original Contribution
  • 205 Downloads

Abstract

Poor dispersion of graphene in solvents and polymers remains a critical obstacle in practical application of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) composite which loading graphene as filler. In order to inhibit the aggregation of reduced graphene oxide (RGO), two dispersants, polyimide (PI) and polyaniline (PANI), were used to modify RGO via in situ polymerization. The functionalization of reduced graphene oxide was characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Hansen solubility parameters (HSPs) theory was an effective way to investigate the compatibility of reduced graphene oxide in various solvents and polymers. Light optical microscope was employed to evaluate actual dispersion of functionalized RGO within the PVDF matrix. From the practical consideration, the dielectric and dynamic mechanical properties of PVDF and the composites were tested by dielectric impedance spectrometer and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), which illustrated the dispersion of reduced graphene oxide in poly(vinylidene fluoride) was closely related to physical performance of composites.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Reduced graphene oxide Functionalization Dispersion Hansen solubility parameters Dielectric properties 

Notes

Funding information

This work was financially supported by a grant from “Research Project Supported by Shanxi Scholarship Council of China” (Grant No. 2015-035) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1607120, U1710117, U1610255).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ataur Rahman GC (2013) Synthesis of PVDF-graphene nanocomposites and their properties. J Alloys Compd 581:724–730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mano JF, Sencadas V, Costa AM, Lanceros-Méndez S (2004) Dynamic mechanical analysis and creep behaviour of β-PVDF films. Mater Sci Eng A 370(1–2):336–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2002.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Layek RK, Samanta S, Chatterjee DP, Nandi AK (2010) Physical and mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) -functionalized graphene/poly(vinylidine fluoride) nanocomposites: piezoelectric β polymorph formation. Polymer 51(24):5846–5856.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.09.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang H, Ehlert GJ, Lin Y, Sodano HA (2011) Highly efficient synthesis of graphene nanocomposites. Nano Lett 12(1):84–90.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl203023k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiong R, Hu K, Grant AM, Ma R, Xu W, Lu C, Zhang X, Tsukruk VV (2016) Ultrarobust transparent cellulose nanocrystal-graphene membranes with high electrical conductivity. Adv Mater 28(7):1501–1509.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201504438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cataldi P, Bonaccorso F, Antonio EDRC, Pellegrini V, Jiang Z, Liu L, Boccardo N, Canepa M, Cingolani R, Athanassiou A (2016) Cellulosic graphene biocomposites for versatile high-performance flexible electronic applications. Adv Electron Mater 2(11):1600245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Belmonte M, Nistal A, Cruz-Silva R, Morelos-Gómez A, Terrones M, Miranzo P, Osendi MI (2015) Directional electrical transport in tough multifunctional layered ceramic/graphene composites. Adv Electron Mater 1(9):1500132.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201500132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sengupta R, Bhattacharya M, Bandyopadhyay S, Bhowmick AK (2011) A review on the mechanical and electrical properties of graphite and modified graphite reinforced polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 36(5):638–670.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yesil S, Winkelmann C, Bayrama G, Saponara VL (2010) Surfactant-modified multiscale composites for improved tensile fatigue and impact damage sensing. Mater Sci Eng A 527(27–28):7340–7352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma J, Nan X, Liu JQ (2017) Investigation of the dielectric, mechanical, and thermal properties of noncovalent functionalized MWCNTs/polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) composites. Polym Adv Technol 28(2):166–173.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3871 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma J, Larsen RM (2013) Comparative study on dispersion and interfacial properties of single walled carbon nanotube/polymer composites using Hansen solubility parameters. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(4):1287–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am302407z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nan X, Ma J, Liu JQ, Zhao J, Zhu WH (2016) Effect of surfactant functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on mechanical, electrical and thermal properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Fiber Polym 0:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-016-0000-0 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pan Y, Bao H, Li L (2011) Noncovalently functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes by chitosan-grafted reduced graphene oxide and their synergistic reinforcing effects in chitosan films. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3(12):4819–4830.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am2013135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deng H, Bilotti E, Zhang R, Wang K, Zhang Q, Peijs T, Fu Q (2011) Improving tensile strength and toughness of melt processed polyamide 6/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites by in situ polymerization and filler surface functionalization. J Appl Polym Sci 120(1):133–140.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.33140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noh YJ, Joh HI, Yu J, Hwang SH, Lee S, Lee CH, Kim SY, Youn JR (2015) Ultra-high dispersion of graphene in polymer composite via solvent freefabrication and functionalization. Sci Rep-UK 5(1).  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09141
  16. 16.
    Hansen CM (2004) Polymer additives and solubility parameters. Prog Org Coat 51(2):109–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hummers WSO (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxid. J Am Chem 80:1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen N, Ren Y, Kong P, Tan L, Feng H, Luo Y (2017) In situ one-pot preparation of reduced graphene oxide/polyaniline composite for high-performance electrochemical capacitors. Appl Surf Sci 392:71–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li Y, Pei X, Shen B, Zhai W, Zhang L, Zheng W (2015) Polyimide/graphene composite foam sheets with ultrahigh thermostability for electromagnetic interference shielding. RSC Adv 5(31):24342–24351.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra16421k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tang X, Hou M, Ge L, Zou J, Truss R, Yang W, Yang M, Zhu Z, Bao R (2012) The preparation, structures, and properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/multiwall carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 125(S1):E592–E600.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.36671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin Z, YY ZL, Liu Y, Wong C (2010) Solvent-assisted thermal reduction of graphite oxide. J Phys Chem C 114:14819–14825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu Q, Chen M, Wang S, Zhang X, Huan L, Diao G (2016) Preparation of sandwich-like ternary hierarchical nanosheets manganese dioxide/polyaniline/reduced graphene oxide as electrode material for supercapacitor. Chem Eng J 304:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang HL, Huawei WZ, Li Z, Liu PB (2016) Preparation of porous polyimide/in-situ reduced graphene oxide composite films for electromagnetic interference shielding. Polym Adv Technol 28:233–242.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu LQ, Liu YL, Neoh KG, Kang ET, Fu GD (2011) Reduction of graphene oxide by aniline with its concomitant oxidative polymerization. Macromol Rapid Commun 32(8):684–688.  https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201000765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chatterjee S, Layek RK, Nandi AK (2013) Changing the morphology of polyaniline from a nanotube to a flat rectangular nanopipe by polymerizing in the presence of amino-functionalized reduced graphene oxide and its resulting increase in photocurrent. Carbon 52:509–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shao D, Hou G, Li J, Wen T, Ren X, Wang X (2014) PANI/GO as a super adsorbent for the selective adsorption of uranium(VI). Chem Eng J 255:604–612.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang Y, Yin D, Zhong C, Xiong R, Shi J, Liu Z, Wang X, Lei Q (2013) Surface morphology and raman analysis of the polyimide film aged under bipolar pulse voltage. Polym Eng Sci 53(7):1536–1541.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.23384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maity N, Mandal A, Nandi AK (2016) Hierarchical nanostructured polyaniline functionalized graphene/poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites for improved dielectric performances. Polymer 103:83–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.09.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang X, Shen Y, Xie A, Li S, Cai Y, Wang Y, Shu H (2011) Assembly of dandelion-like Au/PANI nanocomposites and their application as SERS nanosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 26(6):3063–3067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V, Casiraghi C, Lazzeri M, Mauri F, Piscanec S, Jiang D, Novoselov KS, Roth S, Geim AK (2006) Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 97(18):187401.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang L, Lu C, Wang F, Wang L (2014) Preparation of PVDF/graphene ferroelectric composite films by in situ reduction with hydrobromic acids and their properties. RSC Adv 4(85):45220–45229.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra07379g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Priya L, Jog JP (2002) Poly(vinylidene fluoride)/clay nanocomposites prepared by melt intercalation: crystallization and dynamic mechanical behavior studies. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 40(15):1682–1689.  https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.10223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    He F, Lau S, Chan HL, Fan J (2009) High dielectric permittivity and low percolation threshold in nanocomposites based on poly(vinylidene fluoride) and exfoliated graphite Nanoplates. Adv Mater 21(6):710–715.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200801758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang X, Wang GS, Cao WQ, Wei YZ, Cao MS, Guo L (2014) Fabrication of multi-functional PVDF/RGO composites via a simple thermal reduction process and their enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption and dielectric properties. RSC Adv 4:19549–19601.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra02040e Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dang ZM, Yuan JK, Zha JW, Zhou T, Li ST, Hu GH (2012) Fundamentals, processes and applications of high-permittivity polymer–matrix composites. Prog Mater Sci 57(4):660–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weihui Zhu
    • 1
  • Jing Ma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xi Nan
    • 1
  • Patrick Osei Lartey
    • 1
  • Yongzhen Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Material Science and EngineeringTaiyuan University of TechnologyTaiyuanChina

Personalised recommendations