Advertisement

Colloid and Polymer Science

, Volume 296, Issue 9, pp 1609–1613 | Cite as

Enhanced magnetorheological performance of carbonyl iron/natural rubber composite elastomer with gamma-ferrite additive

  • Chul Joo Lee
  • Seung Hyuk Kwon
  • Hyoung Jin Choi
  • Kyung Ho Chung
  • Jae Heum Jung
Short Communication

Abstract

Magnetorheological (MR) elastomers have attracted considerable attention for their potential applications but their MR efficiency requires significant improvement before they can be used commercially. In this study, rod-shaped hard magnetic gamma-ferrite (γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles were added to a carbonyl iron (CI)@natural rubber (NR) composite elastomer to enhance the MR effect of CI-based MR elastomers. The surface morphological state of the dispersed magnetic particles was tested using scanning electron microscopy, and the fracture profiles of the MR elastomers made of magnetic particles were observed to be anisotropically aligned by mapping using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. MR properties of the MR elastomers based on pure CI and CI@ γ-Fe2O3 were examined using a rotational rheometer under different magnetic field strengths with an enhanced MR efficiency of about 25%.

Graphical Abstract

The CI@ γ-Fe2O3-based MR elastomer was anisotropically fabricated by adding γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and its improved magnetorheological properties were investigated using a rotational rheometer under different magnetic field strengths

Keywords

Ferrite Additive Carbonyl iron Natural rubber Magnetorheological elastomer 

Notes

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Korea (#10047791).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mrlik M, Ilcikova M, Sedlacik M, Mosnacek J, Peer P, Filip P (2014) Cholesteryl-coated carbonyl iron particles with improved anti-corrosion stability and their viscoelastic behaviour under magnetic field. Colloid Polym Sci 292:2137–2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang G, Ma Y, Tong Y, Dong X (2016) Synthesis, characterization and magnetorheological study of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Smart Mater Struct 25:035028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siegfried P, Koo JH, Pechan M (2014) Torque characterization of functional magnetic polymers using torque magnetometry. Polym Test 37:6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wen Q, Wang Y, Gong X (2017) The magnetic field dependent dynamic properties of magnetorheological elastomers based on hard magnetic particles. Smart Mater Struct 26:075012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellucci FS, de Almeida FCL, Nobre MAL, Rodriguez-perez MA, Paschoalini AT, Job AE (2016) Magnetic properties of vulcanized natural rubber nanocomposites as a function of the concentration, size and shape of the magnetic fillers. Composites Part B 85:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bunoiu M, Bica I (2016) Magnetorheological elastomer based on silicone rubber, carbonyl iron and Rochelle salt: effects of alternating electric and static magnetic fields intensities. J Ind Eng Chem 37:312–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sasaki S, Tsujiei Y, Kawai M, Mitsumata T (2017) Electric conductivity and dielectric-breakdown behavior for polyurethane magnetic elastomers. J Phys Chem B 121:1740–1747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li WH, Zhou Y, Tian TF (2010) Viscoelastic properties of MR elastomers under harmonic loading. Rheol Acta 49:733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sedlacik M, Mrlik M, Babayan V, Pavlinek V (2016) Magnetorheological elastomers with efficient electromagnetic shielding. Compos Struct 135:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bastola AK, Hoang VT, Li L (2017) A novel hybrid magnetorheological elastomer developed by 3D printing. Mater Des 114:391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lian CL, Lee KH, Lee CH (2017) Application study of magnetorheological elastomer to rolling friction control. J Tribol 139(5):051101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malini KA, Mohammed EM, Sindhu S, Joy PA, Date SK, Kulkarni SD, Kurian P, Anantharaman MR (2001) Magnetic and processability studies on rubber ferrite composites based on natural rubber and mixed ferrite. J Mater Sci 36:5551–5557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Landa RA, Antonel PS, Ruiz MM, Perez OE, Butera A, Jorge G, Oliveira CLP, Negri RM (2013) Magnetic and elastic anisotropy in magnetorheological elastomers using nickel-based nanoparticles and nanochains. J Appl Phys 114:213912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim SY, Kwon SH, Liu YD, Lee JS, You CY, Choi HJ (2014) Core–shell-structured cross-linked poly(glycidyl methacrylate) coated carbonyl iron microspheres and their magnetorheology. J Mater Sci 49:1345–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fang FF, Jang IB, Choi HJ (2007) Single-walled carbon nanotube added carbonyl iron suspension and its magnetorheology. Diam Relat Mater 16:1167–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hajailou A, Mazlan SA, Shila ST (2016) Magnetic carbonyl iron suspension with Ni-Zn ferrite additive and its magnetorheological properties. Mater Lett 181:196–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sedlacik M, Pavlinek B, Saha P, Svrcinova P, Filip P, Stejskal J (2010) Rheological properties of magnetorheological suspensions based on core–shell structured polyaniline-coated carbonyl iron particles. Smart Mater Struct 19:115008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jang DS, Liu YD, Kim JH, Choi HJ (2015) Enhanced magnetorheology of soft magnetic carbonyl iron suspension with hard magnetic γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticle additive. Colloid Polym Sci 293:641–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moucka R, Sedlacik M, Cvek M (2018) Dielectric properties of magnetorheological elastomers with different microstructure. Appl Phys Lett 112:122901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rudykh S, Bertoldi K (2013) Stability of anisotropic magnetorheological elastomers in finite deformations: a micromechanical approach. J Mech Phys Solids 61:949–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poojary UR, Hegde S, Gangadharan KV (2018) Experimental investigation on the effect of carbon nanotube additive on the field-induced viscoelastic properties of magnetorheological elastomer. J Mater Sci 53:4229–4241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yunus NA, Mazlan SA, Ubaidillah ASAA, Khairi MHA, Wahab NAA, Shilan SY (2016) Investigation on magnetic field dependent modulus of epoxidized natural rubber based magnetorheological elastomer. J Phy Conf Ser 776:012024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jung HS, Kwon SH, Choi HJ, Jung JH, Kim YG (2016) Magnetic carbonyl iron/natural rubber composite elastomer and its magnetorheology. Compos Struct 136:106–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cvek M, Mrlik M, Ilcikova M, Mosnacek J, Munster L, Pavlinek V (2016) Synthesis of silicone elastomers containing silyl-based polymer-grafted carbonyl iron particles: an efficient way to improve magnetorheological, damping, and sensing performances. Macromolecules 50:2189–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang Y, Zhang X, Chung K, Liu C, Choi SB, Choi HJ (2016) Formation of core–shell structured complex microparticles during fabrication of magnetorheological elastomers and their magnetorheological behavior. Smart Mater Struct 25:115028CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chul Joo Lee
    • 1
  • Seung Hyuk Kwon
    • 1
  • Hyoung Jin Choi
    • 1
  • Kyung Ho Chung
    • 2
  • Jae Heum Jung
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Polymer Science and EngineeringInha UniversityIncheonSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Polymer EngineeringUniversity of SuwonHwaseongSouth Korea
  3. 3.Materials Development TeamDaeheung Rubber & Technology Co.KimhaeSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations