Advertisement

Hibiscus sabdariffa L. extract prolongs lifespan and protects against amyloid-β toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans: involvement of the FoxO and Nrf2 orthologues DAF-16 and SKN-1

  • Karoline Koch
  • Nora Weldle
  • Sabrina Baier
  • Christian Büchter
  • Wim WätjenEmail author
Original Contribution
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Hibiscus sabdariffa L. is commonly used as an ingredient for herbal teas and food supplements. Several studies demonstrated the beneficial effects of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. extracts (HSE); however, the bioactive components and their mode of action still remain unclear. Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) was used to study health-related effects and the underlying molecular mechanisms of HSE in this model organism as well as effects of hydroxycitric acid (HCA), a main compound of HSE, and its structural analogue isocitric acid (ICA).

Methods

Survival and locomotion were detected by touch-provoked movement. Thermotolerance was analysed using the nucleic acid stain SYTOX green, and intracellular ROS accumulation was measured via oxidation of H2DCF. Localisation of the transcription factors DAF-16 and SKN-1 was analysed in transgenic strains (DAF-16::GFP, SKN-1::GFP). The involvement of DAF-16 and SKN-1 was further investigated using loss-of-function strains as well as gene silencing by feeding RNAi-inducing bacteria. Protection against amyloid-β toxicity was analysed using a transgenic strain with an inducible expression of human amyloid-β peptides in body wall muscle cells (paralysis assay).

Results

HSE treatment resulted in a prominent extension of lifespan (up to 24%) and a reduction of the age-dependent decline in locomotion. HCA, a main compound of HSE increased lifespan too, but to a lesser extent (6%) while ICA was not effective. HSE and HCA did not modulate resistance against thermal stress conditions and did not exert antioxidative effects: HSE rather increased intracellular ROS levels, suggesting a pro-oxidative effect of the extract in vivo. HSE and HCA increased the nuclear localisation of the pivotal transcription factors DAF-16 and SKN-1 indicating an activation of these factors. Consistent with this result, lifespan prolongation by HSE was dependent on both transcription factors. In addition to the positive effect on lifespan, HSE treatment also elicited a (strong) protection against amyloid-ß induced toxicity in C. elegans in a DAF-16- and SKN-1-dependent manner.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that HSE increases lifespan and protects against amyloid-β toxicity in the model organism C. elegans. These effects were mediated, at least in parts via modulation of pathways leading to activation/nuclear localisation of DAF-16 and SKN-1. Since HCA, a main component of HSE causes only minor effects, additional bioactive compounds like flavonoids or anthocyanins as well as synergistic effects of these compounds should be investigated.

Keywords

Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Caenorhabditis elegans Amyloid-β Plant extract Alzheimer’s disease Hydroxycitric acid 

Abbreviations

daf-16

Abnormal dauer formation-16 (FoxO orthologue)

DCF

2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescein

FoxO

Forkhead box O

GFP

Green fluorescent protein

HCA

Hydroxycitric acid

HSE

Hibiscus sabdariffa L. extract

ICA

Isocitric acid

lof

Loss of function

NGM

Nematode growth medium

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

skn-1

Skinhead-1 (Nrf2-orthologue)

Notes

Acknowledgements

The nematode strains used in this work were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Centre, which is funded by the NIH National Centre for Research Resources (NCRR). This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. We thank Dr. Sebastian Honnen for helpful discussions.

Author contributions

NW, KK: performed experiments, KK, CB: supervision of experiments, WW: coordination of experiments, WW, KK: preparation of manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

394_2019_1894_MOESM1_ESM.tif (899 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIF 898 KB)
394_2019_1894_MOESM2_ESM.tif (1003 kb)
Supplemental Fig. 1 a HSE does not influence pharyngeal pumping of C. elegans (left). 10 nematodes per group were incubated with HSE, HCA, ICA or the respective control for 24 h and pharyngeal pumping of every animal was counted for 15 s and repeated three times, n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, *p ≤ 0,05 vs. control; HSE does not influence bacterial growth of E. coli OP50-1 (right). The OD600 of a growing OP50-1 E. coli culture was photometrically measured at different time points. A freshly prepared OP50-1 E. coli solution with an OD600 of 0.2 was mixed with the HSE stock solution to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml HSE or the equivalent amount H2O and 50 µg/ml streptomycin. Bacteria were allowed to grow for 6 h at 37°C while shaking and an aliquot of the mixture was measured every hour (Synergy MX, BioTek Instruments, Inc.). Simultaneously, a mixture with heat-inactivated OP50-1 E. coli (37°C for 60 min) was measured, since we observed a colour change of the HSE after 1 h of incubation. n = 4 for OP50-1 E. coli, n = 1 for inactivated OP50-1 E. coli. b HSE does not influence growth of C. elegans. In order to investigate if HSE affects larvae growth or c adult body size, body area (left) and length (right) of wild-type nematodes (N2) was measured starting from b L1 or c L4 stage on. Synchronisation was performed according to Stiernagle [19] to obtain L4 larvae or arrested L1 larvae. Animals were incubated in liquid media with different HSE concentrations at 20°C. Images of 10 nematodes were taken daily with a camera (Motic Images Plus 2.0) connected to a stereo microscope (Stemi 2000, Zeiss) and the area and length of the body were measured with ImageJ. Adult nematodes were transferred daily to new incubation media to prevent overcrowding. n = 3 (20 individuals per group), one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (TIF 1003 KB)
394_2019_1894_MOESM3_ESM.tif (2.2 mb)
Supplemental Fig. 2 Efficiency of daf-16 and skn-1 knock-down in C. elegans via feeding HT115 E. coli expressing dsRNA for the corresponding gene. a Representative images of TJ356 nematodes (left) expressing DAF-16::GFP and LD001 nematodes (right) expressing SKN-1::GFP. b Efficiency of daf-16 knock-down. TJ356 nematodes were fed with HT115 E. coli expressing daf-16 dsRNA or empty vector for 40 h at 16 °C. Images of single nematodes were taken with a camera connected to a fluorescence microscope equipped with a GFP filter. Fluorescence intensities of the single nematodes were measured with ImageJ. n = 1 (30 individuals), Student’s t-test, *** p ≤ 0.001 vs. empty vector control. c Efficiency of skn-1 knock-down. CL4176 nematodes were fed with HT115 E. coli expressing skn-1 dsRNA or empty vector for 40 h at 16 °C. Subsequently nematodes were transferred to RNAi plates and hatched larvae (left) and non-hatched eggs (right) were counted until the end of the reproductive period. n = 2 (10 individuals per group), Student’s t-test, ** p ≤ 0.01 vs. empty vector control (TIF 2254 KB)
394_2019_1894_MOESM4_ESM.tif (1 mb)
Supplemental Fig. 3 A: HSE (1 mg/ml) increases oxidative stress resistance of C. elegans. L4 larvae (N2) were incubated with 1 mg/ml HSE or the respective control at 20°C for 3 days. Afterwards 30 nematodes of every treatment group were transferred to S-media containing 50 mM paraquat, 50 µg/ml streptomycin and 109 OP50-1 E. coli. The survival of the animals was measured daily by touch-provoked movement. Lost or ruptured animals were censored. n = 5 (30 individuals per group), Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox)-test, * p ≤ 0.05 vs. control. B: Treatment with HSE increases oxidative stress resistance of Δmev-1 C. elegans (TK22): L4 nematodes of the strain TK22 lacking mev-1 were incubated with 1 mg/ml HSE or the respective control at 20°C for 3 days. Afterwards 40 nematodes of every treatment group were transferred to S-media containing 50 mM paraquat, 50 µg/ml streptomycin and 109 OP50-1 E. coli. The survival of the animals was measured daily by touch-provoked movement. Lost or ruptured animals were censored. n = 3 (40 individuals per group), Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox)-test, *** p < 0,001 vs. control. D: HSE treatment decreases lipofuscin accumulation in the upper intestine of C. elegans. L4/young adult nematodes (N2) were treated with 1 mg/ml HSE or the respective control for 3 days at 20°C. Fluorescence intensities of the upper intestine were measured by densitometric analysis, n = 3 (10 individuals/trial), **p ≤ 0.01 one-way ANOVA with Dunnett‘s multiple comparisons test. D: Antioxidant NAC prevents HSE-induced nuclear accumulation of DAF-16 and SKN-1. L4 nematodes of the strain TJ356 (left) or LD001 (right) were incubated with 1 mg/ml HSE, 10 mM NAC, 1 mg/ml HSE and 10 mM NAC or the respective control at 20°C for 1 h and subsequently analysed by means of fluorescence microscopy. Nematodes with nuclear localisation of DAF-16 or SKN-1 in the intestinal cells were counted, n = 3 (30 individuals per group), (TIF 1053 KB)
394_2019_1894_MOESM5_ESM.tif (674 kb)
Supplemental Fig. 4 HSE at a high concentration (1 mg/ml) is not able to protect against Aβ-induced toxicity in C. elegans fed with HT115 E. coli. Eggs of CL4176 nematodes fed with HT115 E. coli expressing daf-16 dsRNA (left), skn-1 dsRNA (right) or empty vector were treated with 1 mg/ml HSE or the solvent control NGMk for 40 h at 16°C before temperature was shifted to 25°C. Paralysis curve of pretreated C. elegans strain CL4176 was measured 26 h after temperature up-shift every other hour. n = 3 (40 individuals per group), Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox)-test, *** p ≤ 0.001 vs. empty vector control (TIF 673 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Da-Costa-Rocha I, Bonnlaender B, Sievers H, Pischel I, Heinrich M (2014) Hibiscus sabdariffa L.—a phytochemical and pharmacological review. Food Chem 165:424–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hopkins AL, Lamm MG, Funk JL, Ritenbaugh C (2013) Hibiscus sabdariffa L. in the treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia: A comprehensive review of animal and human studies. Fitoterapia 85:84–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Serban C, Sahebkar A, Ursoniu S, Andrica F, Banach M (2015) Effect of sour tea (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) on arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hypertens 33(6):1119–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riaz G, Chopra R (2018) A review on phytochemistry and therapeutic uses of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Biomed Pharmacother 102:575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Addor FAS, Cotta Vieira J, Abreu Melo CS (2018) Improvement of dermal parameters in aged skin after oral use of a nutrient supplement. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 11:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nade V, Kanhere S, Kawale L, Yadav A (2011) Cognitive enhancing and antioxidant activity of ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the methanol extract of Hibiscus rosa sinensis in scopolamine-induced amnesia. Indian J Pharmacol 43(2):137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seung TW, Park SK, Kang JY, Kim JM, Park SH, Kwon BS, Lee CJ, Kang JE, Kim DO, Lee U, Heo HJ (2018) Ethyl acetate fraction from Hibiscus sabdariffa L. attenuates diabetes-associated cognitive impairment in mice. Food Res Int 105:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Begum Z, Younus I (2018) Hibiscus rosa sinensis mediate anxiolytic effect via modulation of ionotropic GABA—a receptors: possible mechanism of action. Metab Brain Dis 33:823–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hritcu L, Foyet HS, Stefan M, Mihasan M, Asongalem AE, Kamtchouing P (2011) Neuroprotective effect of the methanolic extract of Hibiscus asper leaves in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J Ethnopharmacol 137:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strathearn KE, Yousef GG, Grace MH, Roy SL, Tambe MA, Ferruzzi MG, Wu Q-L, Simon JE, Lila MA, Rochet J-C (2014) Neuroprotective effects of anthocyanin- and proanthocyanidin-rich extracts in cellular models of Parkinson׳s disease. Brain Res 1555:60–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams RJ, Spencer JPE (2012) Flavonoids, cognition, and dementia: Actions, mechanisms, and potential therapeutic utility for Alzheimer disease. Free Radic Biol Med 52:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herranz-López M, Olivares-Vicente M, Encinar JA, Barrajón-Catalán E, Segura-Carretero A, Joven J, Micol V (2017) Multi-targeted molecular effects of Hibiscus sabdariffa polyphenols: an opportunity for a global approach to obesity. Nutrients 9:E907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    The C. elegans Sequencing consortium (1998) Genome sequence of the Nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 282:2012–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hulme SE, Whitesides GM (2011) Chemistry and the worm: Caenorhabditis elegans as a platform for integrating chemical and biological research. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50:4774–4807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Griffin EF, Caldwell KA, Caldwell GA (2017) Genetic and pharmacological discovery for Alzheimer’s disease using Caenorhabditis elegans. ACS Chem Neurosci 8:2596–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Büchter C, Ackermann D, Havermann S, Honnen S, Chovolou Y, Fritz G, Kampkötter A, Wätjen W (2013) Myricetin-mediated lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans is modulated by DAF-16. Int J Mol Sci 14:11895–11914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fischer N, Büchter C, Koch K, Albert S, Csuk R, Wätjen W (2017) The resveratrol derivatives trans-3,5-dimethoxy-4-fluoro-4′-hydroxystilbene and trans-2,4′,5-trihydroxystilbene decrease oxidative stress and prolong lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Pharm Pharmacol 69:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fitzenberger E, Deusing DJ, Wittkop A, Kler A, Kriesl E, Bonnländer B, Wenzel U (2014) Effects of plant extracts on the reversal of glucose-induced impairment of stress-resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 69:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stiernagle T (2006) Maintenance of C. elegans. In: WormBook (ed) The C. elegans research community. WormBook.  https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.7.1. http://www.wormbook.org
  20. 20.
    Havermann S, Rohrig R, Chovolou Y, Humpf HU, Wätjen W (2013) Molecular effects of baicalein in Hct116 cells and Caenorhabditis elegans: activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway and prolongation of lifespan. J Agric Food Chem 61:2158–2164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Havermann S, Chovolou Y, Humpf HU, Wätjen W (2016) Modulation of the Nrf2 signalling pathway in Hct116 colon carcinoma cells by baicalein and its methylated derivative negletein. Pharm Biol 54:1491–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Herndon LA, Schmeissner PJ, Dudaronek JM, Brown PA, Listner KM, Sakano Y, Paupard MC, Hall DH, Driscoll M (2002) Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans. Nature 419:808–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Newell Stamper BL, Cypser JR, Kechris K, Kitzenberg DA, Tedesco PM, Johnson TE (2018) Movement decline across lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans mutants in the insulin/insulin-like signaling pathway. Aging cell 17:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ademiluyi AO, Oboh G, Agbebi OJ, Akinyemi AJ (2013) Anthocyanin—rich red dye of hibiscus sabdariffa calyx modulates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and oxidative stress in rats. Int J biomed Sci IJBS 9:243–248Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ajiboye TO, Raji HO, Adeleye AO, Adigun NS, Giwa OB, Ojewuyi OB, Oladiji AT (2016) Hibiscus sabdariffa calyx palliates insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and oxidative rout in fructose-induced metabolic syndrome rats. J Sci Food Agric 96:1522–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nurkhasanah Nurani LH, Hakim ZR (2017) Effect of rosella (Hibiscus sabdariffa L) extract on glutathione-S-transferase activity in rats. Trop J Pharm Res 16:2411–2416Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Owoeye O, Gabriel MO (2017) Evaluation of neuroprotective effect of Hibiscus sabdariffa Linn. Aqueous extract against ischaemic-reperfusion insult by bilateral common carotid artery occlusion in adult male rats. Niger J Physiol Sci 32:97–104Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barbieri M, Bonafè M, Franceschi C, Paolisso G (2003) Insulin/IGF-I-signaling pathway: an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of longevity from yeast to humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metabol 285:E1064–E1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Blackwell TK, Steinbaugh MJ, Hourihan JM, Ewald CY, Isik M (2015) SKN-1/Nrf, stress responses, and aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Free Radic Biol Med 88(Pt B):290–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pillai SS, Mini S (2018) Attenuation of high glucose induced apoptotic and inflammatory signaling pathways in RIN-m5F pancreatic β cell lines by Hibiscus rosa sinensis L. petals and its phytoconstituents. J Ethnopharmacol 227:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kampkötter A, Timpel C, Zurawski R, Ruhl S, Chovolou Y, Proksch P, Wätjen W (2008) Increase of stress resistance and lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans by quercetin. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B 149:314–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen W, Müller D, Richling E, Wink M (2013) Anthocyanin-rich purple wheat prolongs the life span of Caenorhabditis elegans probably by activating the DAF-16/FOXO transcription factor. J Agric Food Chem 61:3047–3053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peixoto H, Roxo M, Krstin S, Röhrig T, Richling E, Wink M (2016) An Anthocyanin-rich extract of acai (Euterpe precatoria Mart.) increases stress resistance and retards aging-related markers in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Agric Food Chem 64(6):1283–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yan F, Chen Y, Azat R, Zheng X (2017) Mulberry anthocyanin extract ameliorates oxidative damage in HepG2 cells and prolongs the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans through MAPK and Nrf2 pathways. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017:7956158Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Carvajal-Zarrabal O, Waliszewski SM, Barradas-Dermitz DM, Orta-Flores Z, Hayward-Jones PM, Nolasco-Hipólito C, Angulo-Guerrero O, Sánchez-Ricaño R, Infanzón RM, Trujillo PRL (2005) The consumption of Hibiscus sabdariffa dried calyx ethanolic extract reduced lipid profile in rats. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 60:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Morales-Luna E, Pérez-Ramírez Iza F, Salgado LM, Castaño-Tostado E, Gómez-Aldapa Carlos A, Reynoso-Camacho R (2018) The main beneficial effect of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) on obesity is not only related to its anthocyanins content. J Sci Food Agric.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9220 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Edwards CB, Copes N, Brito AG, Canfield J, Bradshaw PC (2013) Malate and fumarate extend lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. PloS one 8:e58345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Williams DS, Cash A, Hamadani L, Diemer T (2009) Oxaloacetate supplementation increases lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans through an AMPK/FOXO-dependent pathway. Aging Cell 8:765–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kumar K, Kumar A, Keegan RM, Deshmukh R (2018) Recent advances in the neurobiology and neuropharmacology of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Pharmacother 98:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walsh DM, Klyubin I, Fadeeva JV, Cullen WK, Anwyl R, Wolfe MS, Rowan MJ, Selkoe DJ (2002) Naturally secreted oligomers of amyloid beta protein potently inhibit hippocampal long-term potentiation in vivo. Nature 416:535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Townsend M, Shankar GM, Mehta T, Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ (2006) Effects of secreted oligomers of amyloid β-protein on hippocampal synaptic plasticity: a potent role for trimers. J Physiol 572(Pt 2):477–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    McColl G, Roberts BR, Gunn AP, Perez KA, Tew DJ, Masters CL, Barnham KJ, Cherny RA, Bush AI (2009) The Caenorhabditis elegans Aβ 1–42 model of Alzheimer disease predominantly expresses Aβ. J Biol Chem 284:3–42 22697–22702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brooks KK, Liang B, Watts JL (2009) The influence of bacterial diet on fat storage in C. elegans. PLoS One 4:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dostal V, Roberts CM, Link CD (2010) Genetic mechanisms of coffee extract protection in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of β-amyloid peptide toxicity. Genetics 186:857–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Alavez S, Vantipalli MC, Zucker DJS, Klang IM, Lithgow GJ (2011) Amyloid-binding compounds maintain protein homeostasis during ageing and extend lifespan. Nature 472:226–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Biofunctionality of Secondary Plant CompoundsMartin-Luther-University Halle-WittenbergHalle/SaaleGermany

Personalised recommendations