Advertisement

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the TrueFusion™ fusion-imaging technology

  • Dominik Nelles
  • Jan Wilko Schrickel
  • Georg Nickenig
  • Alexander SedaghatEmail author
Letter to the Editors
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To describe percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAc) in a patient with recurrent gastric ulcer bleeding with the help of the TrueFusion™ fusion-imaging system.

Method and results

In a patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, the need for an effective oral anticoagulation and recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, left atrial appendage closure (LAAc) was performed under guidance of the TrueFusion™ fusion-imaging technology (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) to enhance procedural precision, save radiation time and contrast dye. Left atrial appendage closure was performed with the use of a 20 mm Amplatzer Amulet™ (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA) using the TrueFusion™ system under mild sedation with minimal use of contrast. Intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography revealed complete LAA occlusion without residual flow. The patient was uneventfully discharged on the second postoperative day.

Conclusion

LAAc using an integrated approach combining ultrasound and live fluoroscopy, as provided by the TrueFusion™, is safe and feasible. Target-oriented device navigation and synchronized image orientation as provided by fusion imaging may potentially be beneficial regarding radiation time, contrast dye and periprocedural risk of suboptimal device positioning.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Left atrial appendage closure Stroke Anticoagulation LAA 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Blackshear JL, Odell JA (1996) Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 61:755–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klein AL, Grimm RA, Murray RD, -Hansen C, Asinger RW, Black IW, Davidoff R, Erbel R, Halperin JL, Orsinelli DA, Porter TR, Stoddard MF (2001) Use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 344:1411–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Onalan O, Crystal E (2007) Left atrial appendage exclusion for stroke prevention in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Stroke 38:624–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sedaghat A, Vij V, Streit SR, Schrickel JW, Al-Kassou B, Nelles D, Kleinecke C, Windecker S, Meier B, Valglimigli M, Nietlispach F, Nickenig G, Gloekler S (2019) Incidence, predictors, and relevance of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer occluders: a multicentre observational study. Clin Res Cardiol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01524-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fink T, Schluter M, Tilz RR, Heeger CH, Lemes C, Maurer T, Reissmann B, Rottner L, Santoro F, Mathew S, Rillig A, Ouyang F, Kuck KH, Metzner A (2018) Acute and long-term outcomes of epicardial left atrial appendage ligation with the second-generation LARIAT device: a high-volume electrophysiology center experience. Clin Res Cardiol 107:1139–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hell MM, Achenbach S, Yoo IS, Franke J, Blachutzik F, Roether J, Graf V, Raaz-Schrauder D, Marwan M, Schlundt C (2017) 3D printing for sizing left atrial appendage closure device: head-to-head comparison with computed tomography and transoesophageal echocardiography. EuroIntervention 13:1234–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rajwani A, Nelson AJ, Shirazi MG, Disney PJS, Teo KSL, Wong DTL, Young GD, Worthley SG (2017) CT sizing for left atrial appendage closure is associated with favourable outcomes for procedural safety. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:1361–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ternacle J, Lellouche N, Deux JF, Rande JL, Teiger E, Lim P (2014) Left atrial appendage closure monitoring without sedation: a pilot study using intracardiac echocardiography through the oesophageal route. EuroIntervention 11:936–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yazdani KO, Mitomo S, Ruparelia N, Candilio L, Giannini F, Jabbour RJ, Regazzoli D, Mazzone P, Stella S, Sora N, Montorfano M, Colombo A, Latib A (2019) Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion with the Amulet device: the impact of device disc position upon periprocedural and long-term outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aminian A, Lempereur M, Yedder MB, Dubois P (2018) Real-time fusion of echocardiography and fluoroscopy allowing successful implantation of a WATCHMAN device without contrast injection. EuroIntervention. 14:174–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik IIUniversitätsklinikum BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations