Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 34, Issue 12, pp 2121–2127 | Cite as

Does it matter where you get your surgery for colorectal cancer?

  • Mohammad Hamidi
  • Kamil Hanna
  • Pamela Omesiete
  • Alejandro Cruz
  • Agnes Ewongwo
  • Viraj Pandit
  • Bellal Joseph
  • Valentine NfonsamEmail author
Original Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The influence of hospital-related factors on outcomes following colorectal surgery is not well-established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between hospital factors on outcomes in surgically managed colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

We performed a 2-year (2014–2015) analysis of the NIS database. Adult (> 18 years) patients who underwent open or laparoscopic colorectal resection were identified using ICD-9 codes. Patients were stratified based on hospital: volume (low vs. high), teaching status, and location (urban vs. rural). Outcome measures were complications and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was performed.

Results

A total of 153,453 patients with CRC were identified of which 35.3% underwent surgical management. Mean age was 69 ± 13 years, 51.6% were female, and 67% were white. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were managed at a high-volume center, 48% at intermediate-volume center while 25% at a low-volume center. Complications and mortality rates were lower in patients who were managed at high-volume centers and urban hospitals, while no difference was noticed based on teaching status. On regression analysis, patients managed at high-volume centers (OR 0.76 [0.56–0.89]) and urban hospitals (OR 0.83 [0.64–0.91]) have lower odds of complications; similarly, high-volume centers (OR 0.79 [0.65–0.90]) and urban facility (OR 0.87 [0.70–0.92]) were associated with lower odds of mortality. However, there was no association between teaching status and outcomes.

Conclusion

Hospital factors significantly influence outcomes in patients with CRC managed surgically. High-volume centers and urban facilities have relatively better outcomes. Regionalization of care along with the appropriate availability of resources may improve outcomes in patients with CRC.

Level of evidence

Level III, Retrospective Observational Study

Keywords

Colorectal cancer Hospital volume Urban Rural Teaching hospital 

Notes

Author contributions

Study design and conception: VN, MH, KH, AE, BJ, VP

Data acquisition: AC, VN, KH, MH, PO

Statistical analysis: PO, VN, KH, MH

Manuscript writing: AE, MH, KH, VN, VP

Critical revision: AC, VN, KH, MH, PO, VP, BJ

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Marley AR, Nan H (2016) Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet 7:105–114PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:7–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson RL, Persky V, Turyk M (1999) Determination of factors responsible for the declining incidence of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:741–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2017) Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 66:683–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aziz H, Pandit V, DiGiovanni RM, Ohlson E, Gruessner AC, Jandova J, Nfonsam VN (2015) Increased incidence of early onset colorectal cancer in Arizona: a comprehensive 15-year analysis of the Arizona Cancer Registry. J Gastrointest Dig Syst 5:345PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolligs FT (2016) Diagnostics and epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Visc Med 32:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, Hsieh L, Bach PB, Guillem JG, Begg CB (2003) Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection. J Surg Oncol 83:68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van der Geest LGM, van Rijssen LB, Molenaar IQ, de Hingh IH, Groot Koerkamp B, Busch ORC, Lemmens VEPP, Besselink MGH, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer G (2016) Volume-outcome relationships in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. HPB (Oxford) 18:317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pandit V, Jehan F, Zeeshan M, Koblinski JE, Martinez C, Khan M, Mogor OP, Nfonsam V (2019) Failure to rescue in postoperative patients with colon cancer: time to rethink where you get surgery. J Surg Res 234:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shafi S, Nathens AB, Parks J, Cryer HM, Fildes JJ, Gentilello LM (2008) Trauma quality improvement using risk-adjusted outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 64:599–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2009) Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann Surg 250:1029–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morche J, Mathes T, Pieper D (2016) Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Systematic Rev 5:204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Finlayson EVA, Birkmeyer JD (2003) Effects of hospital volume on life expectancy after selected cancer operations in older adults: a decision analysis. J Am Coll Surg 196:410–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB (2001) The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 345:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Billingsley KG, Morris AM, Dominitz JA, Matthews B, Dobie S, Barlow W, Wright GE, Baldwin L-M (2007) Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship. Arch Surg 142:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB (2000) Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 284:3028–3035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hartz AJ, Krakauer H, Kuhn EM, Young M, Jacobsen SJ, Gay G, Muenz L, Katzoff M, Bailey RC, Rimm AA (1989) Hospital characteristics and mortality rates. N Engl J Med 321:1720–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL (1995) The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg 221:43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bergin RJ, Emery J, Bollard RC, Falborg AZ, Jensen H, Weller D, Menon U, Vedsted P, Thomas RJ, Whitfield K (2018) Rural–urban disparities in time to diagnosis and treatment for colorectal and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers 27:1036–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCullough LE, Flowers CR (2018) Identifying and addressing disparities in survival outcomes for rural patients with cancer disparities in survival outcomes for rural patients with cancerinvited commentary. JAMA Netw Open 1:e181243-eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McNulty JA, Nail L (2015) Cancer survivorship in rural and urban adults: a descriptive and mixed methods study. J Rural Health 31:282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Unger JM, Moseley A, Symington B, Chavez-MacGregor M, Ramsey SD, Hershman DL (2018) Geographic distribution and survival outcomes for rural patients with cancer treated in clinical trials. JAMA Netw Open 1:e181235-eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Livingston EH (2010) Teaching hospital status and operative mortality in the United States. Arch Surg 145:1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Groningen JT, Eddes EH, Fabry HFJ, van Tilburg MWA, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, Snel Y, van de Mheen PJM, de Noo ME (2018) Dutch Surgical Colorectal Cancer Audit G. Hospital teaching status and patients’ outcomes after colon cancer surgery. World J Surg:1–9Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pandit V, Memeh K, Omesiete P, Ewongwo AN, Mogor OP, Chen D, Nfonsam VN. Resident involvement and outcomes after surgery for colorectal cancer. In: Editor ed.^eds. Book resident involvement and outcomes after surgery for colorectal cancer. 5 ed. City: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA …:E130-E1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Arizona Medical CenterTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations