Advertisement

Clinical characteristics of appendiceal diverticular disease

  • Ekrem Çakar
  • Savaş Bayrak
  • Şükrü Çolak
  • Fatih DalEmail author
  • Bünyamin Gürbulak
  • Hasan Bektaş
  • Enver Yarıkkaya
  • Ayşe Gül Ferlengez
Original Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Appendiceal diverticular disease (ADD) is a rare pathology which is associated with an increased mortality risk due to rapid perforation and high rates of neoplasm. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and histopathological characteristics of ADD with differences from acute appendicitis (AA) diagnosis and to determine the association with neoformative processes.

Methods

The 4279 patients who underwent appendectomy were evaluated retrospectively. ADD patients histopathologically classified into four groups. Patients’ demographic characteristics, imaging and preoperative laboratory findings, additionally postoperative histopathology results were compared between groups.

Results

The prevalence of ADD was 2.29% (n = 98). In addition, the male/female ratio was 2.37 in ADD patients who were found to be significantly older than those with AA patients. Type III was the most frequently (62.2%) identified sub-group of ADD. The incidence of neoplasms, plastrone, and Littre’s hernia was found statistically higher in ADD group than AA group. Mucinous adenomas (10.2%) was the most common neoplasm while the carcinoid tumor (1%) and precancerous serrated adenomas (4.1%) were also reported.

Conclusions

As a result, high neoplasm in ADD patients can be shown with incidence of perforation and plastron, and in order to avoid possible neoplasm or major complications, it is necessary to carry out new studies for the right diagnosis of ADD whether the diagnosis is done preoperatively or ıntraoperatively. We recommend surgical resection of the ADD, which may even be incidentally detected during any surgical procedure, due to its high risk of neoplasm and rapid perforation.

Keywords

: Appendiceal diverticular disease Acute appendicitis Neoplasm Appendiceal neoplasm Appendectomy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Martínez JT, Deniz JR, Blanc IL, Olivares EC, Alsina XR, Veloso EV et al (2016) Appendiceal diverticulosis in acute appendicitis: our experience and literature review. J Gen Pract (Los Angel) 4(279):2.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.1000279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ng JL, Wong SL, Mathew R (2018) Appendiceal diverticulosis: a harbinger of underlying primary appendiceal adenocarcinoma? J Gastrointest Oncol 9(2):E1–E5.  https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2017.08.18 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altieri ML, Piozzi GN, Salvatori P, Mirra M, Piccolo G, Olivari N (2017) Appendiceal diverticulitis, a rare relevant pathology: presentation of a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 33:31–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.02.027 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al-Brahim N, Al-Kandari I, Munahai M, Sharma P (2013) Clinicopathological study of 25 cases of diverticular disease of the appendix: experience from Farwaniya Hospital. Pathol Res Int 2013:404308.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/404308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sohn TJ, Chang YS, Kang JH, Kim DH, Lee TS, Han JK, Kim SH, Hong YO (2013) Clinical characteristics of acute appendiceal diverticulitis. J Krean Surg Soc 84(1):33–37.  https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.1.33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lobo-Machín I, Delgado-Plasencia L, Hernández-González I, Brito-García A, Burillo-Putze G, Bravo-Gutiérrez A (2014) et al Appendiceal diverticulitis and acute appendicitis: differences and similarities. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 106:452–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dupre MP, Jadavji I, Matshes E, Urbanski SJ (2008) Diverticular disease of the vermiform appendix: a diagnostic clue to underlying appendiceal neoplasm. Hum Pathol 39(12):1823–1826.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2008.06.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marcacuzco AA, Manrique A, Calvo J, Loinaz C, Justo L, Caso O (2016) Clinical implications of diverticular disease of the appendix. Experience over the past 10 years. Cir Esp 94(1):44–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.05.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lipton S, Estrin J, Glasser I (1989) Diverticular disease of the appendix. Surg Gynecol Obstet 168(1):13–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Terada T (2017) Diverticulosis of vermiform appendix: incidence and report of 6 cases. Case Rep Clin Pathol 4(1):18.  https://doi.org/10.5430/crcp.v4n1p18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamana I, Kawamoto S, Inada K, Nagao S, Yoshida T, Yamashita Y et al (2012) Clinical characteristics of 12 cases of appendiceal diverticulitis: a comparison with 378 cases of acute appendicitis. Surg Today 42(4):363–367.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0152-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barc RM, Rousset J, Maignien B, Lu M, Prime-Guiton CH, Garcia JF (2005) Diverticula of the appendix and their complications: value of sonography (review of 21 cases). J Radiol 86:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan DL, Lim C, Bakhtiar A, Khoury M, Smigelski M, Yeh D et al (2018) Clinical significance of appendiceal diverticulum: a significant marker for appendiceal neoplasia in Australian patients. Int J Color Dis 33(11):1569–1574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3086-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deng YW, Yang HB, Feng KC, Lei TH, Lee CP (2013) Appendiceal diverticular disease. Formosan Journal of Surgery 46(1):4–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjs.2012.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kallenbach K, Hjorth SV, Engel V, Engel U, Schlesinger NH, Holck S (2012) Significance of acquired diverticular disease of the vermiform appendix: a marker of regional neoplasm? J Clin Pathol 65:638–642.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200647 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uchida T, Hirano Y, Yoshida S, Kato H, Aya K, Watanabe T (2012) A case of primary early appendiceal carcinoma detected by perforation of appendiceal diverticulum. J Jpn Surg Assoc 73(5):1144–1148.  https://doi.org/10.3919/jjsa.73.1144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Imamura H, Kawashita Y, Koga N, Azuma T, Hayashi T, Eguchi S (2014) Primary Adenocarcinoma concomitant with perforated diverticulum of the appendix - report of a case. J Jpn Surg Assoc 75(2):484–488.  https://doi.org/10.3919/jjsa.75.484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lamps LW, Gray GF, Dilday BR, Washington MK (2000) The coexistence of low-grade mucinous neoplasms of the appendix and appendiceal diverticula: a possible role in the pathogenesis of pseudomyxoma peritonei. Mod Pathol 13:495–501.  https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880086 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Majeski J (2003 Aug) Diverticulum of the vermiform appendix is associated with chronic abdominal pain. Am J Surg 186(2):129–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00187-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee KH, Lee HS, Park SH, Bajpai V, Choi YS, Kang SB, Kim KJ, Kim YH (2007) Appendiceal diverticulitis: diagnosis and differentiation from usual acute appendicitis using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31(5):763–769.  https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e3180340991 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Osada H, Ohno H, Saiga K, Watanabe W, Okada T, Honda N (2012) Appendiceal diverticulitis: multidetector CT features. Jpn J Radiol 30(3):242–248.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-011-0039-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ito D, Miki K, Seiichiro S, Hata S, Kobayashi K, Teruya M, Kaminishi M (2015) Clinical and computed tomography findings of appendiceal diverticulitis vs acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 21(13):3921–3927.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3921 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hsieh CS, Chen YL, Lee MH, Chang HC, Chen ST, Kuo SJ (2010) A lower costly laparoscopic appendectomy:our experience of more than 2000 cases. Int J Surg 8(2):140–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.11.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Domene CE, Volpe P, Heitor FA (2014) Three port laparoscopic appendectomy technique with low cost and aesthetic advantage. Arq Bras Cir Dig 27(Suppl 1):73–76.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6720201400s100018 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryHealth Sciences University Turkish Ministry of Health İstanbul Research and Training HospitalİstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.IstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of PathologyHealth Sciences University Turkish Ministry of Health İstanbul Research and Training HospitalİstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Department of AnaesthesiologyHealth Sciences University Turkish Ministry of Health İstanbul Research and Training HospitalİstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations