Advertisement

Disease phenotype rather than treatment strategy impacts the long-term quality of life in patients with diverticular disease

  • Maximilian SohnEmail author
  • A. Agha
  • D. Roussos
  • F. Bloss
  • A. Hochrein
  • F. Gundling
  • I. Iesalnieks
Original Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To identify the impact of the severity of diverticular disease on long-term quality of life.

Methods

Consecutive patients, hospitalized between October 2009 and November 2015 due to uncomplicated (UD) and complicated diverticulitis (CD) of the left colon, were analyzed. Patients undergoing emergent surgery for perforated disease were excluded. Primary endpoint was health-related quality of life (HrQol), measured by the Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36). Physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) compository scores were calculated from SF-36 subscales. To overcome bias, one-to-one propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed.

Results

Two hundred eighty of the overall 392 patients (Male 138, Female 142; mean age 60.5 years, range 27–91) answered the SF-36 questionnaire. The median follow-up period was 37.8 months (range 15–85). After propensity score matching, each group consisted of 51 patients. Results of the SF-36 questionnaires showed a statistically significant difference, favoring patients with CD in 5 of 8 domains. Also, PCS (56.3 vs. 52.9, p = 0.13) and MCS (53.3 vs. 46.7, p = 0.005) were higher in patients treated for CD. By a multivariate analysis, complicated disease was independently associated with a better scoring on 6 out of 8 SF-36 subscales and on MCS. Treatment strategy (surgery or conservative) did not have any impact on SF-36 subscales, MCS, or PCS on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

In contrast to complicated disease, the uncomplicated diverticular disease is associated with an impaired long-term quality of life especially in domains composing mental health scores independently of chosen treatment strategy.

Study registration

The study is registered with the Research Registry at June 19, 2019.

Research registry UIN: researchregistry4959.

Keywords

Quality of life Diverticular disease Conservative treatment Elective surgery 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the medical ethics board of the Bavarian medical council.

References

  1. 1.
    Bharucha AE, Parthasarathy G, Ditah I, Fletcher JG, Ewelukwa O, Pendlimari R, Yawn BP, Melton JL, Schleck C, Zinsmeister AR (2015) Temporal trends in the incidence and natural history of diverticulitis: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 110(11):1589–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strate LL, Modi R, Cohen E, Spiegel BMR (2012) Diverticular disease as a chronic illness: evolving epidemiologic and clinical insights. Am J Gastroenterol 107(10):1486–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Friel CM (2012) To operate or not to operate? Should functional outcomes after sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis influence our decision making? Dis Colon Rectum 55(1):1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fozard JBJ, Armitage NC, Schofield JB, Jones OM (2011) Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. ACPGBI position statement on elective resection for diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel. 13(Suppl 3):1–11Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kruis W, Germer C-T, Leifeld L (2014) German Society for Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery. Diverticular disease: guidelines of the German Society for Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery. Digestion. 90(3):190–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andeweg CS, Mulder IM, Felt-Bersma RJF, Verbon A, van der Wilt GJ, van Goor H, Lange JF, Stoker J, Boermeester MA, Bleichrodt RP (2013) Guidelines of diagnostics and treatment of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dig Surg 30(4–6):278–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feingold D, Steele SR, Lee S, Kaiser A, Boushey R, Buie WD, Rafferty JF (2014) Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 57(3):284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leifeld L, Germer CT, Böhm S, Dumoulin FL, Häuser W, Kreis M et al (2014) S2k guidelines diverticular disease/diverticulitis. Z Gastroenterol 52(7):663–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andersen JC, Bundgaard L, Elbrønd H, Laurberg S, Walker LR, Støvring J et al (2012) Danish national guidelines for treatment of diverticular disease. Dan Med J 59(5):C4453Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sallinen V, Mali J, Leppäniemi A, Mentula P (2015) Assessment of risk for recurrent diverticulitis: a proposal of risk score for complicated recurrence. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(8):e557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lamb MN, Kaiser AM (2014) Elective resection versus observation after nonoperative management of complicated diverticulitis with abscess: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 57(12):1430–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall JF, Roberts PL, Ricciardi R, Read T, Scheirey C, Wald C, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ (2011) Long-term follow-up after an initial episode of diverticulitis: what are the predictors of recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum 54(3):283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Livingston EH, Fomby TB, Woodward WA, Haley RW (2011) Epidemiological similarities between appendicitis and diverticulitis suggesting a common underlying pathogenesis. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960 146(3):308–314Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 1982 41(10):1359–1366Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolff BG, Boostrom SY (2012) Prophylactic resection, uncomplicated diverticulitis, and recurrent diverticulitis. Dig Dis Basel Switz 30(1):108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clemens CHM, Samsom M, Roelofs J, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Smout AJPM (2004) Colorectal visceral perception in diverticular disease. Gut. 53(5):717–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spiller R (2012) Is it diverticular disease or is it irritable bowel syndrome? Dig Dis Basel Switz. 30(1):64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bolster LT, Papagrigoriadis S (2003) Diverticular disease has an impact on quality of life -- results of a preliminary study. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 5(4):320–323Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levack MM, Savitt LR, Berger DL, Shellito PC, Hodin RA, Rattner DW, Goldberg SM, Bordeianou L (2012) Sigmoidectomy syndrome? Patients’ perspectives on the functional outcomes following surgery for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 55(1):10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Endokrine- und Minimal-invasive Chirurgie, München Klinik BogenhausenMunichGermany
  2. 2.OCM Klinik – MünchenMunichGermany
  3. 3.Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und gastroenterologische Onkologie, München Klinik BogenhausenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations