Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 34, Issue 7, pp 1303–1315 | Cite as

Prognostic impact of the combination of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and Glasgow prognostic score in colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

  • Susumu Inamoto
  • Kenji KawadaEmail author
  • Ryosuke Okamura
  • Koya Hida
  • Yoshiharu Sakai
Original Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Although neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte count, and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) are well-known prognostic markers in cancer, their prognostic importance is still controversial. We evaluated the prognostic value of NLR, PLR, monocyte count, and GPS in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Method

We retrospectively evaluated 448 CRC patients undergoing curative resection. We compared overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) between dichotomized groups by the optimal cutoff point. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify prognostic factors.

Result

High NLR, high monocyte count, and high GPS exhibited significantly worse prognosis in OS, CSS, and DFS compared with low NLR, low monocyte count, and low GPS, respectively. In contrast, PLR was not significantly associated with OS, CSS, and DFS. The univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that poor OS was significantly associated with age ≥ 69 and high NLR; that poor CSS was significantly associated with age ≥ 69, M factor, high CA19-9, adjuvant chemotherapy, and high GPS; and that poor DFS was significantly associated with venous invasion, high NLR, and high GPS. When 448 patients were classified into three groups based on NLR and GPS, there was a significant difference in OS, CSS, and DFS between all the three groups. Patients with NLR ≥ 2.05 and GPS = 1/2 exhibited remarkably poorer prognosis, whereas those with both NLR < 2.05 and GPS = 0 exhibited remarkably better prognosis.

Conclusion

Combination of NLR and GPS can be a novel scoring system to effectively stratify outcome in CRC.

Keywords

Systemic inflammatory response Colorectal cancer Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio Glasgow prognostic score 

Notes

Grant supports

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (to KK and SI).

Authors’ contribution

KK, SI and YS planned the study concept and design. Acquisition of data was done by SI. Analysis and interpretation of data was done by SI, KK, RO, and HK. KK and SI wrote the manuscript, and edited by all the authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

384_2019_3316_Fig7_ESM.png (123 kb)
Supplementary Figure 1

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of NLR, monocyte count, and PLR for the prediction of overall survival (OS). a, NLR. b, monocyte count. c, PLR. (PNG 122 kb)

384_2019_3316_MOESM1_ESM.eps (177 kb)
High Resolution Image (EPS 176 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP (2014) Colorectal cancer. Lancet 383(9927):1490–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balkwill F, Mantovani A (2001) Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet 357(9255):539–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS (2003) Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 90(2):215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M (2010) Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 140(6):883–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ (2014) Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol 15(11):e493–e503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malietzis G, Giacometti M, Askari A, Nachiappan S, Kennedy RH, Faiz OD, Aziz O, Jenkins JT (2014) A preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio of 3 predicts disease-free survival after curative elective colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 260(2):287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galizia G, Lieto E, Zamboli A, De Vita F, Castellano P, Romano C, Auricchio A, Cardella F, De Stefano L, Orditura M (2015) Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a strong predictor of tumor recurrence in early colon cancers: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surgery 158(1):112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patel M, McSorley ST, Park JH, Roxburgh CSD, Edwards J, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2018) The relationship between right-sided tumour location, tumour microenvironment, systemic inflammation, adjuvant therapy and survival in patients undergoing surgery for colon and rectal cancer. Br J Cancer 118(5):705–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Šeruga B, Vera-Badillo FE, Aneja P, Ocaña A, Leibowitz-Amit R, Sonpavde G, Knox JJ, Tran B, Tannock IF, Amir E (2014) Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(6):dju124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guthrie GJ, Charles KA, Roxburgh CS, Horgan PG, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ (2013) The systemic inflammation-based neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: experience in patients with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 88(1):218–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li MX, Liu XM, Zhang XF, Zhang JF, Wang WL, Zhu Y, Dong J, Cheng JW, Liu ZW, Ma L, Lv Y (2014) Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 134(10):2403–2413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    You J, Zhu GQ, Xie L, Liu WY, Shi L, Wang OC, Huang ZH, Braddock M, Guo GL, Zheng MH (2016) Preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio is a valuable prognostic biomarker in patients with colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 7(18):25516–25527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ozawa T, Ishihara S, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, Tanaka J, Kiyomatsu T, Hata K, Kawai K, Nozawa H, Kazama S, Yamaguchi H, Sunami E, Kitayama J, Watanabe T (2015) The preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic marker in patients with stage II colorectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 30(9):1165–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park JH, Watt DG, Roxburgh CS, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2016) Colorectal cancer, systemic inflammation, and outcome: staging the tumor and staging the host. Ann Surg 263(2):326–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suzuki Y, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, Tsuruta M, Shigeta K, Kondo T, Kitagawa Y (2018) Comparison of preoperative inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 267(3):527–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Horie T, Kubota K (2007) Inflammation-based prognostic score is a novel predictor of postoperative outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 246(6):1047–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roxburgh CSD, Salmond JM, Horgan PG, Oien KA, McMillan DC (2009) Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation-based pathologic and biochemical criteria in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 249(5):788–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haruki K, Shiba H, Fujiwara Y, Furukawa K, Wakiyama S, Ogawa M, Ishida Y, Misawa T, Yanaga K (2012) Perioperative change in peripheral blood monocyte count may predict prognosis in patients with colorectal liver metastasis after hepatic resection. J Surg Oncol 106(1):31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang L-N, Xiao W, OuYang P-Y, You K, Zeng Z-F, Ding P-R, Pan Z-Z, Xu R-H, Gao Y-H (2015) The prognostic impact of preoperative blood monocyte count in pathological T3N0M0 rectal cancer without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Tumor Biol 36(10):8213–8219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Angerson WJ, Dunlop DJ (2003) Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 89(6):1028–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F (2008) Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 454(7203):436–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, Bartlett BR, Kemberling H, Eyring AD, Skora AD, Luber BS, Azad NS, Laheru D, Biedrzycki B, Donehower RC, Zaheer A, Fisher GA, Crocenzi TS, Lee JJ, Duffy SM, Goldberg RM, de la Chapelle A, Koshiji M, Bhaijee F, Huebner T, Hruban RH, Wood LD, Cuka N, Pardoll DM, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Zhou S, Cornish TC, Taube JM, Anders RA, Eshleman JR, Vogelstein B, Diaz LA Jr (2015) PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med 372(26):2509–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mizuno R, Kawada K, Itatani Y, Ogawa R, Kiyasu Y, Sakai Y (2019) The role of tumor-associated neutrophils in colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci 20(3)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Itatani Y, Kawada K, Fujishita T, Kakizaki F, Hirai H, Matsumoto T, Iwamoto M, Inamoto S, Hatano E, Hasegawa S, Maekawa T, Uemoto S, Sakai Y, Taketo MM (2013) Loss of SMAD4 from colorectal cancer cells promotes CCL15 expression to recruit CCR1+ myeloid cells and facilitate liver metastasis. Gastroenterology 145(5):1064–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Inamoto S, Itatani Y, Yamamoto T, Minamiguchi S, Hirai H, Iwamoto M, Hasegawa S, Taketo MM, Sakai Y, Kawada K (2015) Loss of SMAD4 promotes colorectal cancer progression by accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells through CCL15-CCR1 chemokine axis. Clin Cancer Res 22(2):492–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yamamoto T, Kawada K, Itatani Y, Inamoto S, Okamura R, Iwamoto M, Miyamoto E, Chen-Yoshikawa TF, Hirai H, Hasegawa S, Date H, Taketo MM, Sakai Y (2017) Loss of SMAD4 promotes lung metastasis of colorectal cancer by accumulation of CCR1+ tumor-associated neutrophils through CCL15-CCR1 axis. Clin Cancer Res 23(3):833–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ogawa R, Yamamoto T, Hirai H, Hanada K, Kiyasu Y, Nishikawa G, Mizuno R, Inamoto S, Itatani Y, Sakai Y, Kawada K (2019) Loss of SMAD4 promotes colorectal cancer progression by recruiting tumor-associated neutrophils via CXCL1/8-CXCR2 axis. Clin Cancer Res:2887–2899.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3684
  28. 28.
    Pagès F, Mlecnik B, Marliot F, Bindea G, Ou FS, Bifulco C, Lugli A, Zlobec I, Rau TT, Berger MD, Nagtegaal ID, Vink-Börger E, Hartmann A, Geppert C, Kolwelter J, Merkel S, Grützmann R, Van den Eynde M, Jouret-Mourin A, Kartheuser A, Léonard D, Remue C, Wang JY, Bavi P, Roehrl MHA, Ohashi PS, Nguyen LT, Han S, MacGregor HL, Hafezi-Bakhtiari S, Wouters BG, Masucci GV, Andersson EK, Zavadova E, Vocka M, Spacek J, Petruzelka L, Konopasek B, Dundr P, Skalova H, Nemejcova K, Botti G, Tatangelo F, Delrio P, Ciliberto G, Maio M, Laghi L, Grizzi F, Fredriksen T, Buttard B, Angelova M, Vasaturo A, Maby P, Church SE, Angell HK, Lafontaine L, Bruni D, El Sissy C, Haicheur N, Kirilovsky A, Berger A, Lagorce C, Meyers JP, Paustian C, Feng Z, Ballesteros-Merino C, Dijkstra J, van de Water C, van Lent-van Vliet S, Knijn N, Mușină AM, Scripcariu DV, Popivanova B, Xu M, Fujita T, Hazama S, Suzuki N, Nagano H, Okuno K, Torigoe T, Sato N, Furuhata T, Takemasa I, Itoh K, Patel PS, Vora HH, Shah B, Patel JB, Rajvik KN, Pandya SJ, Shukla SN, Wang Y, Zhang G, Kawakami Y, Marincola FM, Ascierto PA, Sargent DJ, Fox BA, Galon J (2018) International validation of the consensus immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: a prognostic and accuracy study. Lancet 391(10135):2128–2139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ogino S, Nosho K, Irahara N, Meyerhardt JA, Baba Y, Shima K, Glickman JN, Ferrone CR, Mino-Kenudson M, Tanaka N, Dranoff G, Giovannucci EL, Fuchs CS (2009) Lymphocytic reaction to colorectal cancer is associated with longer survival, independent of lymph node count, microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 15(20):6412–6420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guthrie GJ, Roxburgh CS, Farhan-Alanie OM, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2013) Comparison of the prognostic value of longitudinal measurements of systemic inflammation in patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 109(1):24–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Proctor MJ, Morrison DS, Talwar D, Balmer SM, Fletcher CD, O'Reilly DS, Foulis AK, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2011) A comparison of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with cancer. A Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study. Eur J Cancer 47(17):2633–2641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    He W, Yin C, Guo G, Jiang C, Wang F, Qiu H, Chen X, Rong R, Zhang B, Xia L (2013) Initial neutrophil lymphocyte ratio is superior to platelet lymphocyte ratio as an adverse prognostic and predictive factor in metastatic colorectal cancer. Med Oncol 30(1):439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ishibashi Y, Tsujimoto H, Hiraki S, Kumano I, Yaguchi Y, Horiguchi H, Nomura S, Ito N, Shinto E, Aosasa S, Yamamoto J, Ueno H (2018) Prognostic value of preoperative systemic immunoinflammatory measures in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25(11):3288–3299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim EY, Lee JW, Yoo HM, Park CH, Song KY (2015) The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio versus neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: which is better as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 22(13):4363–4270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mano Y, Shirabe K, Yamashita Y, Harimoto N, Tsujita E, Takeishi K, Aishima S, Ikegami T, Yoshizumi T, Yamanaka T, Maehara Y (2013) Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a predictor of survival after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Ann Surg 258(2):301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations