To what extent is the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) associated with quality of life as measured using the EORTC C30 and CR38 quality of life questionnaires?
- 24 Downloads
Treatment of rectal cancer often results in disturbed anorectal function, which can be quantified by the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score. This study investigates the association of impaired anorectal function as measured with the LARS score with quality of life (QoL) as measured with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and CR38 questionnaires.
All stoma-free patients who had undergone sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer from 2000 to 2014 in our institution were retrieved from a prospective database. They were contacted by mail and asked to return the questionnaires. QoL was evaluated in relation to LARS and further patient- and treatment factors using univariate and multivariate analysis.
Of the eligible patients (n = 331), 261 (78.8%) responded with a complete LARS score. Mean score for global QoL according to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire was 63 ± 21 for all patients. If major LARS was present, mean score decreased to 56 ± 19 in contrast to 67 ± 20 in patients with no/minor LARS (p < 0.001). In regression analysis, major LARS was furthermore associated with reduced physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning as well as impaired body image, more micturition problems and poorer future perspective. It was not related to sexual function. The variance explained by major LARS in the differences of QoL was approximately 10%.
The presence of major LARS after rectal resection for cancer is negatively associated with global health as well as many other aspects of QoL. Preserving anorectal function and treatment of LARS are potential measures to improve QoL in this patient group.
KeywordsRectal cancer Sphincter-preserving surgery Quality of life Low anterior resection syndrome score
The authors are indebted to Lisa Domichowski, Medical Data Manager, for her support in data acquisition. The maintenance of the database at the Coloproctologic Unit of Dresden-Friedrichstadt General Hospital is supported by a grant from the Tumour Centre Dresden.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical approval was granted by the responsible institution (Saxon Physicians Chamber, No. EK-BR-92/15-1/134619).
- 5.Battersby NJ, Juul T, Christensen P, Janjua AZ, Branagan G, Emmertsen KJ, Norton C, Hughes R, Laurberg S, Moran BJ, United Kingdom Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Study Group (2016) Predicting the risk of bowel-related quality-of-life impairment after restorative resection for rectal cancer: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Dis Colon Rectum 59:270–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomly A, on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group (2001) The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, 3rd edn. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 15.Young T, de Haes H, Curran D, Fayers P, Brandberg Y, Vanvoorden V, Bottomley A, on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group (2002) Guidelines for assessing quality of life in EORTC clinical trials. EORTC Quality of Life Group Publication, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 16.Curran D, Aaronson N, Standaert B, Molenberghs G, Therasse P, Ramirez A, Koopmanschap M, Erder H, Piccart M (2000) Summary measures and statistics in the analysis of quality of life data: an example from an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK locally advanced breast cancer study. Eur J Cancer 36:834–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bottomley A, de Graeff A, Groenvold M, Gundy C, Koller M, Petersen MA, Sprangers MAG (2008) EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 19.Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, Espin E, Jimenez LM, Matzel KE, Palmer GJ, Sauermann A, Trenti L, Zhang W, Laurberg S, Christensen P (2014) Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life: an international multicenter study. Dis Colon rectum 94:1278–1284Google Scholar
- 22.Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181:335–346Google Scholar
- 37.Contin P, Kulu Y, Bruckner T, Sturm M, Welsch T, Müller-Stich BP, Huber J, Büchler MW, Ulrich A (2014) Comparative analysis of late functional outcome following preoperative radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery or surgery alone in rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 29:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Wiltink LM, Chen TYT, Nout RA, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Fiocco M, Laurberg S, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM (2014) Health-related quality of life 14 years after preoperative short-term radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 50:2390–2398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Stephens RJ, Thompson LC, Quirke P, Steele R, Grieve R, Couture J, Griffiths GO, Sebag-Montefiore D (2010) Impact of short-course preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer on patients’ quality of life: data from the Medical Research Council CR07/National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group C016 randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 28:4233–4239CrossRefGoogle Scholar